• Technotica@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    2 months ago

    One reason why that is probably not true is because there are less positrons but if it were true they should number the same as electrons, right?

    But if electrons are moving along the same “time direction” as we are and positrons are moving in the opposite “direction” then wouldn’t we expect there to be less protons? As we can’t measure the protons that already “passed” us? And we would measure more electrons as a some/many/all of the existing electrons are traveling alongside us?

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      2 months ago

      I think you may have put more thought into this than Feynman. But then he probably had someone waiting for him in bed…

      • Technotica@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        2 months ago

        I know! Horrible isn’t it? I just can’t help it, thinking about stuff is actually fun for me… so embarrassing!

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          2 months ago

          It was more a joke about how Feynman had two great loves: physics and fucking. And probably fucking more than physics.

      • TempermentalAnomaly@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Positrons are different from protons. Both have a positive charge, but a positron is an elementary particle of a similar mass as an electron. They are rather rare in nature which OP was noting. Protons are made of three elementary particles, much heavier than positrons, and are, I imagine, present in nature in about the same order of magnitude as electrons.