• Encrypt-Keeper@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    1 month ago

    I say this as someone who likes fediverse microblogging (Mastodon, MissKey, etc) it will never be Mastodon. Mastodon and its maintainers are staunchly against all the things that would make it a viable replacement to Twitter.

      • Serinus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        1 month ago

        They don’t like algorithms. They want you to select which content you see.

        That’s all I’ve got. Mastodon is a better, more open tech. And it’s pretty easy to get set up, relatively. It’s insane that companies haven’t jumped on it.

        You don’t even have to quit Twitter. You can just post to more than one place and give people the option.

        • kameecoding@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          This is what happens when someone can’t put themselves into their user’s shoes and then wonder why a product isn’t doing as well as it is.

          They proclaim the product is great, it’s everyone else that’s the problem

        • Patch@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 month ago

          Threads (for better or worse) demonstrates that that’s not a fundamental obstacle for fediverse microblogging.

          If someone wanted to launch a Mastodon fork with algorithm-driven content discovery, they could do. Just as with Lemmy/kbin/mbin, the beauty of the fediverse is that different servers can take quite different approaches to use experience design whilst still maintaining compatibility with the rest of the community.