• Dariusmiles2123@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 day ago

    As long as a computer has 4 usb-c ports, I think you’re covered for everything.

    Yes we had more different ports back in the days, but most were never used.

    Usb-c is way more practical. Still that implies that you have more than 2 Usb-c ports.

    • Omgboom@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      Yeah guys it’s way more practical to carry 11 usb c dongles everywhere you go

      • fallingcats@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        18 hours ago

        That’s the most straw in a straw man I’ve seen in the whole thread.

        Most new laptops have USB-C, A, and SD/micro SD, and HDMI. That’s 95% of all uses.

        If you really need more then you just bought the wrong laptop. Get a Thinkpad or framework 16. If you need to interface with old hardware, get a contemporary machine.

    • GetOffMyLan@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 day ago

      At work both my monitors and networking go through the same port. The monitor also acts as a usb hub.

      You can buy an adapter and plug everything in one port.

      I love it personally.

      • potustheplant@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        You can only do that because your monitors are not high resolution and high refresh rate. The data cap for usb-c is not that high.

        • ccunning@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 day ago

          USB-C is just a connector, but Thunderbolt 5 uses it and for asymmetric uses (e.g. a monitor) it can hit 120Gbps.

          Isn’t that going to support most monitors?

          • potustheplant@feddit.nl
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            1 day ago

            Please, list the devices that you know have tb5.

            Also, that’s the total bandwidth in a best case scenario. You’re not factoring in that you’ll need to share that with all of the devices in a hub. That’s without mentioning that you need the hub (which also has a cost).

            • rmuk@feddit.uk
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 day ago

              The USB4 protocol can handle 160Gb/s split asymettrically (so, say, 120Gb/s out, 40Gb/s in), wheras the upper limit for DisplayPort’s highest bandwidth mode, Quad UHBR 20, is 80Gb/s in one direction. So you can saturate your DisplayPort 2.0 quad-channel with more than enough bandwidth to power three 10K 60Hz 30-bit (i.e. very high-end) monitors in DSC mode, and still only be using half the bandwidth of USB4, all using a single cable which I can also use to charge my earphones.

              • fallingcats@discuss.tchncs.de
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 day ago

                Most devices only have 40gbps USB4. Which is still enough for almost all sane use cases. Frankly, if you need multiple 4K monitors get a desktop.

                • potustheplant@feddit.nl
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  1 day ago

                  Uhm no? There are more than a few use cases that require a mobile set up for demos for example but that you’d also want to use in a desk setting. For example, architects or sw dev.

                  Which is still enough for almost all sane use cases.

                  Like 2 4k60 monitors and literally nothing else? You have a very conservative opinion of what a “sane” use case is. Not to mention that lots of USB-C cable certification is a mess so not even getting the cable is simple (or cheap).

                  • fallingcats@discuss.tchncs.de
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    0
                    ·
                    18 hours ago

                    Show me one architect that is actually dragging along two external 4k displays with their laptop.

                    If you are a professional with specific needs buy a specific laptop. Frankly there are more than enough laptops that have more ports if that’s what you need. Except even in your example you don’t even need more ports because you can just use the second USB4 port.