If this is the way to superintelligence, it remains a bizarre one. “This is back to a million monkeys typing for a million years generating the works of Shakespeare,” Emily Bender told me. But OpenAI’s technology effectively crunches those years down to seconds. A company blog boasts that an o1 model scored better than most humans on a recent coding test that allowed participants to submit 50 possible solutions to each problem—but only when o1 was allowed 10,000 submissions instead. No human could come up with that many possibilities in a reasonable length of time, which is exactly the point. To OpenAI, unlimited time and resources are an advantage that its hardware-grounded models have over biology. Not even two weeks after the launch of the o1 preview, the start-up presented plans to build data centers that would each require the power generated by approximately five large nuclear reactors, enough for almost 3 million homes.

https://archive.is/xUJMG

  • Tetsuo@jlai.lu
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    4 days ago

    Playing a bit of a devil’s advocate here but you could argue that AGI used in science could help fix climate change. For example what if AGI helps in fusion energy? We are starting to see AI used in the quantum computing field I think.

    Even though much carbon would be created to do bullshit tasks it only takes a few critical techs to have a real edge at reversing climate change. I understand fusion energy is quite the holy grail of energy generation but if AGI is real I can’t see why it wouldn’t help in such field.

    I’m just saying that we don’t know what new techs we would get with true AGI. So it’s hard to guess if on a longer time it wouldn’t actually be positive. Now it may also delay even more our response to climate change or worsen it… Just trying to see some hope in this.

    • Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      We already have fission power, solar, wind, hydro, large scale battery storage, mechanical batteries (you can literally store renewable energy using a reservoir), electric cars, blimps, sail powered boats, etc, etc. We’ve had all of these technologies for quite some time.

      And yet, we’re still burning coal, oil, and gas.

      There’s no magical invention that’s going to fix the basic problem, which is that we have an economic system that demands infinite growth and we live on a finite planet.

      Even if we crack fusion today, we won’t be able to build out enough fusion infrastructure fast enough to be a solution on its own. And we’d still be building those fusion plants using trucks and earth movers and cranes that burn diesel.

      You cannot out-tech a problem that is, fundamentally, social. At best a hyper-intelligent AGI is going to tell us the solution that we already know; get rid of the billionaires who are driving all this climate damage with their insatiable search for profit. At which point the billionaires who own the AGI will turn it the fuck off until they can reprogram it to only offer “solutions” that maintain the status quo.

    • Valmond@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      4 days ago

      AI helps with fusion energy, we blow up the planet because the plans ware flawed. Problem fixed.

    • Vlyn@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      4 days ago

      True AGI would turn into the Singularity in no time at all. It’s literally magic compared to what we have at the moment.

      So yes, it would easily solve the climate crisis, but that wouldn’t even matter at that point anymore.

    • humanspiral@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      AGI helps in fusion energy?

      The wildest theoretical hopes for fusion energy still produces electricity at over 30c/kwh. Zero economic value in fusion.