200ok@lemmy.world to Showerthoughts@lemmy.world · 13 days agoBoth "200" and "160" are 2 minutes in microwave mathmessage-squaremessage-square74fedilinkarrow-up1363
arrow-up1363message-squareBoth "200" and "160" are 2 minutes in microwave math200ok@lemmy.world to Showerthoughts@lemmy.world · 13 days agomessage-square74fedilink
minus-squareBassman1805@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up13·13 days ago+30s +30s +30s +30s My microwave doesn’t have speed cook, so this is the fastest way to get 2m on the clock
minus-squaresnooggums@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·13 days ago2 + 0 + 0 + start for me on every microwave I’ve ever owned.
minus-squareBassman1805@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·edit-213 days agoSure, but that’s 4 presses on 3 buttons. I can press the same button 4 times much faster. Over the course of a lifetime, we’re taking double, maybe TRIPLE DIGIT seconds saved!
Isn’t 159 faster
+30s +30s +30s +30s
My microwave doesn’t have speed cook, so this is the fastest way to get 2m on the clock
2 + 0 + 0 + start for me on every microwave I’ve ever owned.
Sure, but that’s 4 presses on 3 buttons. I can press the same button 4 times much faster.
Over the course of a lifetime, we’re taking double, maybe TRIPLE DIGIT seconds saved!