• catloaf@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        25 days ago

        I mean, I can count how many times I’ve thought “damn I wish I still had wired headphones” on zero hands.

        • OnfireNFS@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          24 days ago

          I’ve never really understood the argument against headphone jacks. I can still use Bluetooth headphones with my phone. I can also use wired headphones and aux cables on my phone. Why would you want less features

          • Raiderkev@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            24 days ago

            I’d be fine if they gave us another USB C port, but inability to listen and charge the phone at the same time without using Bluetooth (which also needs to be charged) grinds my gears.

          • catloaf@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            24 days ago

            I’m not arguing against it, just not particularly arguing for it. Out of all the removed features, I’d want the IR blaster back. I can’t do that with Bluetooth.

        • southsamurai@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          24 days ago

          I dunno, how about the horrible privacy practices of most cars nowadays? Bluetooth allows connection, sure. It also allows data to go between the device and the car. An aux jack can’t do that.

          • Anivia@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            24 days ago

            FYI “to each their own” was a phrase used on the entrance of a nazi concentration camp, same as “work sets you free”. Might wanna avoid that phrase in the future

            • RogueBanana@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              24 days ago

              Makes no sense. Using a commonly used phrase has nothing to do with Nazis in almost any context despite the origin. No need to start making a list of things to change because of an old connection to something bad.

        • theonlytruescotsman@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          25 days ago

          Must be nice to either accept the objectively worse sound quality of wireless headphones, or be wealthy enough to afford a product that sounds almost as good as the wired version does for ten times the price and just not care about it getting stolen.

          • wander1236@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            25 days ago

            I care a moderate amount about audio quality, but my bigger gripes with Bluetooth generally involve the latency and inconvenience of switching devices (even with multipoint).

          • catloaf@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            25 days ago

            If I cared that much about audio quality, I wouldn’t be listening to music on my phone anyway.

            I’m not sure which product you’re referring to that’s ten times the price. You can get quality monitors for around $200. I don’t know of any Bluetooth headphones that are going to match that quality at any price, but you can get close enough for the majority of purposes in the same price range. The biggest issue will be the Bluetooth audio codec and the wireless link itself (signal strength and latency), not the sound reproduction quality.

          • bjorney@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            24 days ago

            be wealthy enough to afford a product that sounds almost as good as the wired version does for ten times the price

            Or maybe just go buy a $5 adapter so you can use your wired headphones

    • zod000@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      24 days ago

      It’s not crazy to want to keep using your excellent wired headphones and not rely on battery powered bullshit

      • Hanrahan@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        24 days ago

        I have a pair of Etymotics that i have had for 20 years, ficks no 3.5mm jack. Have a Nokia phone I use that has uSD and earphone jack.

      • gamermanh@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        24 days ago

        It is when you act like adapters don’t exist

        This is written by someone who’s using IEMs on a pixel, this weird obsession with jacks on the phones should have died years ago

        • Hanrahan@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          24 days ago

          They turn a robust connector into a fragile piece of shit, 1/2 ass’d compromise is the best description.

        • zod000@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          24 days ago

          I’m using IEMs on a pixel too, with a jack as intended not some bullshit dongle.

    • kratoz29@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      25 days ago

      My daily driver is a Poco F2 Pro which has the jack port.

      My car is old and I still wire it to the speakers for using Spotify and such, my gf has to use the adapter thingy for her iPhone and she can’t charge and play music at the same time, I can do that without an issue.

      Too bad companies keep getting rid of ports.

      • viking@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        24 days ago

        There are adapters with charger throughput. Or else a car phone holder with wireless charging capability that’s connected to the cigarette lighter port will do the trick.

    • viking@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      24 days ago

      I just got a USB-C to 3.5" adapter and done. The phones listed here are either overpriced or shit.

      • Retrograde@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        24 days ago

        Extremely hard disagree. Have you used a modern Sony phone before? What makes the Sony over priced compared to it’s Apple, Samsung or Google counterparts?

        • viking@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          24 days ago

          I’ve used older Xperia phones, not new ones. But a list price of 1400 bucks is by default overpriced. Samsungs are so full of bloat and proprietary shit, I wouldn’t touch them, ever. Plus their bootloader can’t be unlocked, which is heavily restricting my use cases.

          Wouldn’t ever touch Apple devices either, and while Pixel phones are great, the price points of the new 9 Pro at around 900 bucks is high, but barely in acceptable range for me. Don’t have one (still happy with my OnePlus 10 Pro, that was about 650 bucks I think), but that’s the only high end brand you mentioned that I would consider if I were to upgrade at this point.