We haven’t even made it to January 20 (Trump inauguration). We already have major fires in our second largest city, terrorist attacks, talk of invading Greenland/Panama/Canada. almost no one talking about what we really need to do to cut carbon. Hospitals are full in my area and people talk about washing hands, but not about masking. I am already so weary. I don’t know what is going to happen after January 21.

  • neidu3@sh.itjust.worksM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    71
    ·
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    I found it a lot more peaceful once I started filtering out certain word combinations that indicate a ragebait bullshit headline. I considered just filtering out “trump”, but I want actual news to come through, so here’s the list:

    Trump wants
    Trump says
    Trump will
    Trump hints
    Trump demands
    Trump indicates
    Trump claims
    Trump considering
    Trump tells

    …and repeat the list for Musk and Vance. Those verbs target the nothingburger headlines only meant to attract clicks. Basically, we learned 9 years ago that he says loads of stupid shit that doesn’t deserve a headline. I might be interested if he signs something.

      • gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        “Goes to war with” might not be a great idea to filter on, because that fuckin imbecile will very probably start an actual war with a country that can hit back, now that he’s emptying out all of the career + nonpolitical people in the state department, DoD, and alphabet agencies who stopped him from doing that last time.

        • RedstoneValley@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          4 days ago

          Probably, but the headline will start with "US invades“ or "US demands“ or something along the line. Filtering out anything that starts with “Trump” is safe

        • Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 days ago

          Paragraph? This is Trump we’re talking about. He can’t hold a thought for longer than two sentences, max.

          • Zonetrooper@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 days ago

            I wasn’t talking about him, but more other people who - if you see a headline of “XY succinctly summarizes [issue]”, all it will be is distilling a messy, nuanced topic down to “You should feel A,” often with ragebait to convince you.

    • idunnololz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 days ago

      I just filter trump and Elon entirely and read the news once a day. If the news is that big it should hit my local paper.

    • SwingingTheLamp@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      We need an AI agent that filters out all news articles that are just people flapping their pie-holes, whether that be the President-elect, or Twitter randos.

    • Devorlon@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      I couldn’t be bothered anymore, and a revolution isn’t getting organised in a Lemmy comment section under a Trump article