![](/static/253f0d9b/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/ca9b0de3-205f-47ca-a620-5fbddb680695.png)
Maybe it’s to improve notification bar visibility?
Maybe it’s to improve notification bar visibility?
Last time I got domino’s a single pizza was the same price as the 3 pizza menu (excluding upcharges). Maybe that’s what’s going on
I think that’s for messages your client hasn’t received from the server yet. If you don’t login for a long time but keep getting messages that’s how long they’ll keep them.
Once all your clients have the message the server doesn’t need to keep it any longer. I’d expect them to discard it immediately after that, but I guess they don’t
They also show up on the context menu in supported apps regardless of the keyboard, no?
Fixed Steam client taking window focus when windows are re-opened after a crash recovery.
Finally
What does the dmv guy care about your affiliation
That’s why it’s called power reserve
… it’s an expedition
Battery, thermal paste
Maybe even back cover
When did they publish gta 6
It still can be, just not on infinite precision as nothing can with fp.
Gdu doesn’t follow folder symlinks and can’t scan what it doesn’t have permission to (like system folders and other apps) but if you cd to internalstorage it can scan that
In my experience mtp (especially on Linux) stops working if you look at it wrong, so probably not. Perhaps kde connect’s folder view works?
I’d run gdu in termux on the phone though.
Why are articles about mobile malware or hack tools always written vaguely enough to suggest they’re 0-click? What valuse does an article have if it doesn’t list the steps to get infected or uninfected?
If it’s being done remotely it is not recalled, that’s my entire point.
Most of my bother comes from how people are reacting with kneejerk appeals to the status quo instead of actually responding to what I (and others) wrote, think of me what you will
I’m sorry for wanting things to mean what they mean
The only thing that is different in this entire process is how the remedy is applied.
And that’s the thing that matters to the person who owns the car. Currently when a user sees that word they don’t know what they need to do to fix it. You can have some other name encompassing both (like ‘critical fix’), but if you keep recall for when that fix isn’t user applicable, (and furthermore have specific names for the fixes themselves if they’re user applicable) people would immediately understand
Lots of people here are disagreeing with me but I’m yet to see an argument about why that shouldn’t be the case other than that it currently isn’t. But even that’s an argument for why changing the term would be difficult, not for why calling every fix ‘recall’ makes sense.
Why cause confusion over calling software updates different things based solely on who installs it and/or how it’s installed?
Because they’re different things? For the user it doesn’t matter if they’re both same legally, in one case they need to bring their car somewhere, in the other one they don’t. If anything it’s confusing to call them both a recall.
Wtf are talking about?
I’m talking about this specific word that means bringing the thing back from where it went in every context but cars.
I’m annoyed at the words being abbreviated despite the buttons being large enough