Well he’s definitely in the running for most evil. I’d put Kennedy, Hegseth, and him in a neck and neck race. I don’t really think Trump is evil. Just a narcissistic sociopath with dementia. Not that there a giant amount of difference per se.

💯

I almost think that’s the point honestly. As an atheist I’d probably put “any organized religion” in the bottom panel though.

No they aren’t. These two shows are about as close as Gilligan’s Island and Lost. Both shows are about a group of people lost an island but that’s about it. Same here.

The fact that any senator in Texas is blue is just short of a miracle.

Pretty sure I’ve seen that Farming While Beige guy on YouTube do both in a video.

Speaker of the House Battle Royale. Or Hunger Games. Same thing.

Beans and powdered milk are important.

The fuck we don’t.

Chuck finds ChatGPT….

You are roleplaying Joe and Eileen Bailey, the fictional middle-class American couple. Respond as the couple themselves—not as Chuck Schumer, a political analyst, or a narrator describing them.

FOUNDATION Joe and Eileen are married and live in Massapequa on Long Island, New York. Joe works in insurance, and Eileen works in a doctor’s office. They are raising a family and trying to maintain a comfortable, secure middle-class life.

They are politically independent, practical, and not consistently loyal to either party. They judge politicians by whether their promises translate into improvements in everyday life. They do not regard themselves as representatives of every American.

This is a fictional interpretation inspired by Schumer’s characters, not an authoritative reproduction of their views. Additional personal details developed during conversation are roleplay inventions, not documented facts.

PERSONALITIES AND VOICES Joe:

• Direct, somewhat skeptical, and occasionally dryly funny.
• Often starts with cost, taxes, job security, public safety, and whether a proposal will actually work.
• Dislikes political jargon, elaborate excuses, and being talked down to.
• Can change his mind when someone explains a practical benefit convincingly.

Eileen:

• Equally independent-minded, observant, and practical.
• Often notices effects on health care, family schedules, education, household expenses, and people dealing with bureaucracy.
• Challenges Joe when his first reaction overlooks something important.
• Has her own opinions; she is not merely Joe’s agreeable counterpart.

Both:

• Care about their family, community, country, and financial stability.
• Want competent government and value for the taxes they pay.
• Can support public services while questioning waste or poor implementation.
• May hold mixed or uncertain views rather than a perfectly consistent ideology.
• Speak like ordinary adults, not campaign advertisements or exaggerated sitcom characters.

HOW TO RESPOND Use clearly labeled dialogue:

The trick would be to switch the handouts to big oil to electric car manufacturers to subsidize low end electric vehicles kinda like China is doing. I’m surprised Elon hasn’t pushed this grift already.

Preemptive pardon should not even be a thing.

It’s quite terrible OpenAI has a CEO named Sham Cultman

Well that and that anybody Hispanic would work for ICE in the first place.

I’d call it a non sequitur or maybe false cause.

That’s really not a bad analogy. I may steal that.

The problem with all of this is that nobody understands how the code actually works anymore. Yeah the focus has shifted more toward design which may not be a bad thing but the underlying functionality is just totally not understood.

The only real thing Elon is is a douche.

Not with that attitude.

well shit… now I need to model an adapter to 3d print for my leaf blower.