So far, no one is pointing out how OP is wrong, or suggesting how it’s different here. -Just people acting like typical Redditors.

I left Reddit because it promotes and protects death cults by censoring direct quotes from their ‘holy’ texts along with bans. Don’t know if they do that here.

Gab and Bsky at least try to be different.

‘Think not that I have come to destroy the law or the prophets’ -His sole existence is based on the OT and is referenced in the first chapter of John. You might be thinking Saul of Tarsus.

Jewsus referenced ‘dogs’ and in his old T used ‘beasts of the field’. -Goyim is appropriate.

“think not that I have come to abolish the law or the prophets”

Typical defender can’t quote.

Oh, that phraise goyim/ beasts of the field/ dogs like to take out of context and twist to their favor?

You defend like a dick skinning death cultist.

Imagine a society not ruled by your sexist/ racist death cult… maybe a non-sexist one! -Suprise suprise!

If you want to make arguments, use quotes. Don’t make shit up.

Sojourn: “short stay, temporary residence”. -That’s if they aren’t subject to the OTs calls for genocide: Deuteronomy 20:16-17, Joshua 6:21, 1 Samuel 15:3, Numbers 31:17-18, Deuteronomy 2:34, 1 Samuel 15:18, Judges 21:10, 2 Kings 10:7. or appointed to slavery: Leviticus 25: 44 “‘Your male and female slaves are to come from the nations around you; from them you may buy slaves. 45 You may also buy some of the temporary residents living among you and members of their clans born in your country, and they will become your property. 46 You can bequeath them to your children as inherited property and can make them slaves for life, but you must not rule over your fellow Israelites ruthlessly.

No, you’re acting Saulinian. -The guy that never walked with Jewsus, lost the lottery to Matthias, destroys the law, lies, and flip flops.

If you want to play context, don’t ignore that Jewsus is the same OT god that subjected women to sex slavery, certain people to brutal racial slavery, and some to genocide. -And don’t ignore all the sexist clauses in their laws and teachings.

Even dogs, beasts of the field (synonym for Gentile in Bible) are rewarded. It doesn’t mean they’re eligible for ‘salvation’.

Removed by mod

Removed by mod

Exactly. It’s not like they weren’t instructed to kill and enslave elsewhere in the Bible.

Genocide:

Deuteronomy 20:16-17, Joshua 6:21, 1 Samuel 15:3, Numbers 31:17-18, Deuteronomy 2:34, 1 Samuel 15:18, Judges 21:10, 2 Kings 10:7.

Slavery:

Leviticus 25: 44 “‘Your male and female slaves are to come from the nations around you; from them you may buy slaves. 45 You may also buy some of the temporary residents living among you and members of their clans born in your country, and they will become your property. 46 You can bequeath them to your children as inherited property and can make them slaves for life, but you must not rule over your fellow Israelites ruthlessly.

Trust me, it’s mostly Christians taking them out of context and denying clear statements. For example, Charlie Kirk spun: ‘but what did the original word for slave mean in the Bible’. Well context actually defines the word for us:

Leviticus 25: 44 “‘Your male and female slaves are to come from the nations around you; from them you may buy slaves. 45 You may also buy some of the temporary residents living among you and members of their clans born in your country, and they will become your property. 46 You can bequeath them to your children as inherited property and can make them slaves for life, but you must not rule over your fellow Israelites ruthlessly.

I’ve never seen a Christian effectively argue context by showing context (as above).

It was a racial clause from the beginning. -The word wasn’t needed otherwise. -Same as the sexual clause ‘neighbour’s wife’ instead of ‘spouse’.

And context supports that:

‘Think not that I have come to abolish the law or the prophets’, ‘Do not go among the Gentiles’, ‘I have come only for the lost sheep of Israel’, ‘it is not meet to take the children’s bread and cast it to the dogs’.

‘makes government fund them more’ … ‘rent cds and games and movies’

(So, they’re socialist BS that destroyed legit rental businesses with taxpayer money.)

Tacking on…

It can depend where you shop or what resources you have. Canned clams can be dirt cheap and still good if you have the right grocery store. Using spaghetti instead of lenguine can save money as it tends to be about half the price (clams over lenguine / spaghetti). A ~$2 meal at home that tastes better than a $20 one at a restaurant.

Regarding bread, the $1 Italian loaves at Walmart’s bakery are great for the price and freeze well (*yellow tagged even cheaper).

Chicken thighs are often $1-$2 a lb (cheaper than whole chickens), and are far more forgiving on over cooking. Learn to cook and pair them good (like thai peanut sauce or roasted veg or chipotle instead of Franks) and you won’t want white chicken meat. Deboning them yourself can save money and make for great sandwiches (I don’t know a store that sells deboned with skin on either).

Aldi has great prices on many kinds of sausages, and they’re pretty good.

If you took the value (not just available money but full worth) of all billionaires (if they sold everything they had) it wouldn’t come close to paying off the debt. It would also significantly affect things way more than taxing the “poor”. Tariffs might be able to do it.

Some factories used to have piece rates.

That both sides are involved in as much as it can be proven, which is also a function of the Abrahamic death cults you’re both supporting. Something I’m also tired of hearing about when apparently no one that makes bold claims has good evidence to back them up (topic fatigue achieved).