Rule 1

You don’t seem familiar with the term. Linux Community Toxicity Ties Directly into Inferiority Complex Psychology

I think they’re 3-4 years behind Linux for hardware support. Both are way behind Windows.

Trail Out was unbeatable because a time trial mid-game. It wasn’t obvious, took me hours of trying. After watching a video demonstrating, I realized I was doing the run far better (damn near perfect) and still failing. It wasn’t until I played it on Windows. -A lot of Linux gaming problems aren’t apparent. Valve plays off this and LiGNUt’s self-blame, ignorance and dishonesty.

Are you suggesting the issues were NEVER brought up before they were fixed because they were fixed the day they found them? Valve didn’t even fix the frame pacing issue - WINE did!

A display of the lack of integrity and desire to control of information.

Variant I worked on:

Manjaro had choices for kernels. When I ran arch, I compiled one.

And a refund wouldn’t compensate my time wasted trying to beat the level (personal experience), or the time wasted figuring out why it was unbeatable when I was doing the level better than what was shown in video tutorials. It also wouldn’t compensate for the hassle of having to switch back to Windows (for false promises from LiGNUts), or transferring a save.

Even using Valve’s hardware (steam deck), users cited spending more time just getting games to work than actual playing. Gamers didn’t ask for an alternate hobby.

Yeah, but another thing in common with them. - thinking their anecdotes matter.

The vocal minority mainly. The Linux advocates that are historically “new tech-phobic” until Linux, Linus, or RMS does it. The anti-AI fervor has quelled since Linus’s announcement about it for example.

KDE serves a purpose that many LiGNUts aren’t even aware of. They prioritize features an innovation over a polished product. It’s funny to watch them suggest Plasma after ridiculing something for being buggy.

Even Linus Torvalds would tell you that it’s a bad thing, and there are many problems that arise from creating derivative distros.

They’re not that different. That’s an excuse to divert from its technical failures. The project to fix that ‘problem’ has died last I knew for a reason (it wasn’t a real problem).

The same types suggesting that crap are the ones that would point to Krita which is wildly different.

One man’s trash is another’s treasure.

Linux is used primarily due to the propaganda and available admins. Large networks like Netflix depend on BSD. You’re the first in years that has contested what BSD is generally regarded as better for. You’re literally disagreeing with what even your fellow Linux advocates would agree on about BSD. -Not that there isn’t misinformation about Linux so there could be about BSD, but you’re also not showing any evidence either.

You mean destroying careers of peers because of Stallman vendetta.

You go happily run a grocery store with a ‘free food’ stand/bank across the street that survives due to government grants, legal interference and exploitation of unpaid / low paid workers.

Richard Stallman started GPL to exact revenge on his peers in an attempt to destroy their careers.

No, if it didn’t exist, we’d have better competition for Windows. It’s too self-limiting with its unstable ABI/API, and commie GPL. BSD is freer and has better load handling, efficiency, networking stack, security, cohesiveness, documentation, etc. And then there’s all the OSes that were promising that Linux squashed by idiots saying ‘we can do that in Linux’ when Linux is flawed at its foundation. -Haiku for example is made for less robust hardware and is much better than Linux for it, but LiGNUts only see Linux.

Linux is destroying the industry. If you hate Microsoft: hate Linux because Linux is the best possible competition scenario it could have. Google is far worse than Microsoft though, and they were enabled by Linux.

yeah, the one that can actually make points and not have to resort to anecdotes, personal attacks, brigading, and debunked propaganda.