data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ec025/ec025be9085d2cb83128083ed4d8bf8da5cd94af" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ec025/ec025be9085d2cb83128083ed4d8bf8da5cd94af" alt=""
I think it’s supposed to spell it “CAsH”.
I think it’s supposed to spell it “CAsH”.
It looks British.
So what you’re saying is he’s on the List.
There’s more than one variety of class traitor?
It’s almost like they’re begging for it.
Who’s the greedy snitch? That’s what I want to know.
We are past the soap and ballot box stages.
Didn’t trump claim he could shoot someone in the streets of New York and get away with it? Maybe it was him.
Would the CEO have lived if he had had a gun?
A really really bad joke.
In the teenage boy caught in the hyper masculine world of American highschool? Yes.
In the actualized adult trying to understand myself and the world? Also yes.
I think you’re close to the root of it. The need for a biological legacy is strong no matter any affiliations. Having “non-conforming” children threatens that legacy.
For the groups that inflate this drive, that’s all there is. That’s the only purpose. No “we as a species”.
For the rest of us it might be a little disappointing at the prospect of no grandchildren. But we know that it’s ultimately not our decision. And the same outcome could happen regardless of any “conformity”.
Why don’t you try? I’m sure you’d do a bang-up job explaining.
Why not Canexico? Or Mexida?