• DarkFuture@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 hour ago

    Next president, assuming there is one, will just change it back to repair relations with our allies.

    Even if it never gets changed back, it’ll be a generation before people actually start calling it that. No one alive now is going to give a fuck about the Gulf of America or call it that.

    Hey conservatives, not that you’re intelligent enough to figure out how to get on Lemmy, but if by some miracle one of you reads this, why is Trump doing this and floating invading our allies and annexing their territories instead of lowering the price of groceries as promised on day 1?

  • GnuLinuxDude@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    4 hours ago

    This whole thing is extremely cringe. There isn’t any other way to put it. Trump. His executive order. The compliance. It’s all cringe.

  • cmhe@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    edit-2
    4 hours ago

    Interesting discussion about this on the OpenStreetMap forums.

    The resolution is introducing “official_name” tags, referencing “en_us”, because “en” is not just the U.S.:

    https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/gulf-of-america-gulf-of-mexico/124571/11

    So when OsmAnd or OrganicMaps start to support them, maybe your locale settings will change the displayed name there as well.

    Current description of that node: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/305639190/history/80

    So maybe that could be a reason for everyone around the world to stop using en_US locale settings. XD

    • Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      12 minutes ago

      Just tried: the ‘report an issue’/‘suggest an edit’ button doesn’t appear when The Gulf of Mexico is selected.

      It does for other locations, but not for the Gulf.

  • RxBrad@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Genuinely curious… How does Google handle other oceanic naming that isn’t agreed upon Worldwide?

    Google Maps view of the Southern Ocean around Antarctica

  • VodkaSolution @feddit.it
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    edit-2
    8 hours ago

    Also, report an error to google maps:

    It reads: I read “Gulf of America”. That must be a mistake.

    • tias@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Obviously that’s not going to make one iota of difference. They’re an American company and they have been ordered by the president of the country to do this. They already do similar things in other authoritarian countries like China and Turkey, because anything else would risk the safety of Google employees.

      If you don’t like it, change to a non-American product and/or vote for a different president.

      • VodkaSolution @feddit.it
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 hours ago

        I somehow have a feeling that being president of the USA does not mean you can do whatever you want and people have to follow… Google Map, for one, is a product of a private company, not a Federal Service of the USA - so if they want to call it “Gulf of Google”, they could!
        Then you’re right, they already protect/black out places and some places’ names, however the Gulf of America, like the Channel of Washington are just bs that in the worst case scenario will live 4 years. So it’s a joke and I like joking too

      • sem@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 hours ago

        The American president can only order so much. As of yesterday, the BGN has changed the name, but this affects Federal Government usage. Google as a private company could continue to use the common name if they wanted to.

        This is why Open Street Maps has a “name” field and “official name” field, for where these two aren’t the same. This is already the case for the English names “Saigon” and “Ho Chi Minh City” which refer to the same place in Vietnam.

        • tias@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 hours ago

          Well, that’s apparently for the courts to decide. In the meantime they have an executive order to contend with. Google has reclassified the U.S. as a “sensitive country” along with other authoritarian regimes and I’m convinced that this is partly out of concern for the safety of Google employees. Who knows what maga cultists might do if they don’t comply.

          • sem@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            2 hours ago

            Personally I think that obeying in advance only makes it a riskier place for the employees, but it is not my decision to make.

            Regardless, I don’t see what issue the courts would have with a private company using the common name of a geographical feature instead of the official government name. That would be a violation of the 1st amendment protection of free speech from government intervention.

  • mrmule@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    edit-2
    9 hours ago

    I’m currently in France, this is what I see on Google maps Gulf of Mexico (Gulf of America)

    What a f*cking joke 😂

    Maps.me shows the real name

    As does mappy.cz

    • kent_eh@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 hours ago

      I’m in Canada, and Google maps shows me the same as what you are seeing.

  • VodkaSolution @feddit.it
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    8 hours ago

    UNITED STATES OF NORTH MEXICO
    I’m gonna start creating new pubs, bars and so on, everywhere I go, and call them Trump’s Mexican Deli, Donnie & Elon’s vacancy hotel, and so on. Please contribute (use an alternative google account)

  • afronaut@lemmy.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    9 hours ago

    I’m in the process of migrating my saved locations and addresses to Organic Maps. Bye Google.

  • jaemo@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Cool.

    In not at all related news disabling Google maps on your Android device can often be a source of delight! I never knew how capable organic maps was and it has a very nice auto integration.

    • DarkFuture@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 hour ago

      Bingo.

      Imagine getting every “alpha male” 2A nutjob violent conservative to realize who their actual enemy is.

      We’d get some actual positive change in an extremely short period of time.

      • superkret@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        18 minutes ago

        Organic Maps has fewer features and settings, a more stripped-down user interface, and concentrates on what most people use the most (find an address, navigate to it).
        It is also much, much faster than OsmAnd.
        Personally, I find OsmAnd too slow and clunky, and Organic Maps a bit too basic.
        But I prefer Organic Maps 95% of the time.

      • gedaliyah@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        8 hours ago

        Also a great choice. I prefer organic maps for a variety of reasons (like ability to contribute to the maps), but a lot of people prefer OsmAnd. They are both very good.