• Sanctus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    4 days ago

    This is a pathway to Starship Trooper’s soldiers being guaranteed citizenship. Imagine having a child here and they aren’t a citizen but you are.

    • O_R_I_O_N@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      Imagine if only old people ran the government… What a nightmare that would be… Ah fuck.

    • troed@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 days ago

      The whole MAGA movement can be described as people who did not get the point in Starship Troopers.

    • Im_old@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 days ago

      Jus soli (birthright citizenship based on where you are born) is not that common to be fair. I don’t think it’s the standard in Europe for example. You have to reside (legally) in a country for a certain number of years AND pay taxes for them to be eligible to get citinzenship

      • kava@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        it’s very common in colonial societies like most of the Americas. without this type of law there wouldn’t be any American citizens. even before the 14th amendment we had birth right citizenship by common law precedence

          • kava@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 days ago

            pretty much. we all grew up in the US being taught it’s a country of immigrants and the “bring me your weary your hungry your whatever masses to be free”

            it’s actually kind of fascinating to see that ideology shift so fast it’s giving whiplash. turns out we actually kinda need these people for our economy otherwise we’ll end up like European countries with stagnating economies until we eventually get overrun by China

            • earphone843@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 days ago

              It’s never been our ideology in practice.

              In reality it’s been, “Send us your weary your hungry masses to be worked to death and treated like lesser beings.”

  • andrewta@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    They’ll give it to him.

    I made this prediction back when he started saying he wanted to remove birth right citizenship. It’s just a matter of time

  • gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 days ago

    Birthright citizenship is a law made at a time when the American population was significantly smaller and wanted to grow to be able to provide more workforce to bring about progress, which benefitted everyone. Now, progress is ending/slowing down, and demand for human labor is declining; and a shrinking population is a good thing because it matches that shrinking demand for labor. Immigration is a bad thing because it increases the population size instead of decreasing it. And also, the birthrate should drop lower to reduce the supply of workforce, keep up wages (via supply-demand of labor) and better the living conditions of the people.

  • Mr_Crash_Davis@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 days ago

    Headline is a tad ambitious. This action is procedural in nature and does not / will not address the merits of the case. The Trump admin is asking the Supreme Court to strike down the three national injunctions and limit the scope of the birthright orders to only apply to citizens in the states where it was granted.

    • dhork@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      the Trump administration says

      “Universal injunctions have reached epidemic proportions since the start of the current administration,” the filing says. “Those universal injunctions prohibit a Day 1 Executive Order from being enforced anywhere in the country, as to ‘hundreds of thousands’ of unspecified individuals who are ‘not before the court nor identified by the court.’”

      While totally ignoring the fact that reason why there are so many injunctions is Trump keeps ignoring laws and the Constitution. An immediate injunction is entirely appropriate in that case.

      Besides, it’s not like the lower court judge issues the injunction and that’s the end of the story. There is still litigation, and everything can get appealed. Limiting the scope of those injunctions will only serve to have Trump selectively ignore the Constitution for states what like what he is doing, which is not how it’s supposed to work at all.