• gregorum@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    72
    ·
    2 months ago

    Even the judge hates that Google keeps shutting down projects unexpectedly

    • deweydecibel@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      64
      ·
      2 months ago

      It is shocking because they did it after the investigation had started, which is monumentally stupid.

      You can destroy any records you want at any time, unless there’s an investigation underway or you have good reason to believe one will be starting. At that point, you’re destroying evidence.

    • firadin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      2 months ago

      No, it’s shocking that the destroyed evidence after being explicitly instructed not to.

  • foggy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    2 months ago

    $10 says they’re backed up somewhere.

    A company like Google has redundant backups in their veins.

    Just sayin.

  • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 months ago

    You shouldn’t use deleted chats as evidence. That is a precedent that should not be a allowed to stand. Its up there with Tor users automatically being criminals.

    I’m am sure they can find some evidence even if they have to fall back to interviews of employees.

      • unreasonabro@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Pfft. Then you’ll be complaining about all the dummies that didn’t even understand your progressively more simple prose as you try to explain semi-complex concepts to people with no shared educational background