• Libra00@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    4 hours ago

    I have a handy reply ready for those times: ‘No.’ The key, though, is really in the delivery. You gotta start typing, and just type ., backspace, ., backsapce, etc for a good 30 seconds, give them time to sweat a little, then you drop it on them. No preamble, no fucking about, just straight to the point with minimum effort. Proper capitalization and punctuation help deliver the point that this is a considered reply and not a half-assed ‘fuck off.’ Now they have to imagine that you spent 30 seconds typing and deleting numerous rants about their stupidity for even contacting you. And then you have to sell the delivery: no replies whatsoever until your next shift starts. It makes it clear that you weren’t fucking around, weren’t playing hard to get, weren’t just whining before you go do the thing, but that you are not and in fact never were going to do on your off-time whatever bullshit they were about to ask you to do, and it will reinforce the earlier point that they should feel bad for even asking.

    Context can really freight a lot of meaning into two letters and a punctuation mark.

  • lightnsfw@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    16 hours ago

    Unless it’s my boss or someone I actually need to talk to I ignore them until they state their business. I have no time for rude mfers.

  • Evil_Shrubbery@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    47
    ·
    edit-2
    16 hours ago

    Omfg, why don’t people use multiple lines to formulate their statement?

    I have to hear 10 pings before they are even midway through what they are saying.

    Edit: to clarify - it’s not the pings (or any anger or annoyance toward those generally, it’s the purposeless emptiness of them, looking at then individually), it’s the short messages that I read and then have to wait for the next several to even get the picture (and in between returning to whatever I was working on before, several times).

    • emergencybird@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      21 hours ago

      I thought I was the only one being driven mad by this! It’s even better when the messages are all short so you hear multiple pings in rapid succession

      • Evil_Shrubbery@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        16 hours ago

        You know it’s gonna get pingy before any substance can be compiled together when the first message is just ‘hi’, then 10+ seconds later the second line drops and it’s like 3 words, and still no subject in slight.

    • SkyeStarfall@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      20 hours ago

      Muscle memory from when people get annoyed that I’m “taking too long”

      Sometimes it’s appropriate to do many small messages as you’re writing up the full thing, other times it’s better to wall of text. It depends on the person and context imo

      • Evil_Shrubbery@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        17 hours ago

        Yes, ofc, the nuances are part of the digital literacy (and I agree completely - if a convo is two-sided and active, ofc).

        But in the initial message, ‘people don’t know’ how long you are writing it.

      • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        18 hours ago

        Also, just put your phone on vibrate or something, Jesus. Such a petty thing to care about.

        It’s up there with caring about the color of your text bubble.

        • Evil_Shrubbery@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          17 hours ago

          I have it muted, bit still get bubbles on my PC - it’s the fact that I get to read those bubbles & then have time to get back up my work two or three times before they get to their question or whatever.

          How many times you get distracted during your work is important to basically all people, it’s just how our brain work (and how much the chemicals of managing such switches get to you in the long run).

          • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            17 hours ago

            I guess… It’s the same amount of words so I’m reading the same amount of text. So to me it’s the same level of distraction either way.

            • Evil_Shrubbery@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              16 hours ago

              The same amount of text but not the same amount of time - waiting for the person to write it vs reading it all in one go.

              Especially when the subject is complex (and/or you are busy), this is several minutes.

              (The debate, Teams, is work environment.)

      • Evil_Shrubbery@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        16 hours ago

        Lol, I know, I’m not bothered by them as such.

        And I also want to respond to most people promptly.

        But not sending a sensible coherent message as one message is just basic etiquette. One could choose to send emails (or even physical mail) line-by-line too, each line in a separate message.

        Or even here - this reply could have been posted in 6 parts.

  • Obi@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    20 hours ago

    Even outside of work context I bloody hate “hey” texts… I have a friend that always does that (or some other variations with added “how’s it going” etc) and doesn’t start typing what he actually wanted to ask until I reply “hey” back… Then I’m just staring at the “typing…” for 5min…

    • Elvith Ma'for@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      22 hours ago

      You can set a default status message in Teams that gets displayed right when someone tries to message you. That link is in mine. It doesn’t work for everyone, but for most.

        • cactusupyourbutt@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 hours ago

          I dont think this is passive agressive at all. The automatic reply would be, but as a status? No, this just communicates the way you want to be messaged

    • silverlose@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      1 day ago

      I wish my company could require that everyone read that page as training. Though, I do use this to tell who’s smarter/productive than others.

  • SlopppyEngineer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Answer “hi” back, my job here is done, and ignore until next task I’m working on is complete. You’re on my schedule now buddy. Bonus points for answering out of their time zone’s working hours to see if the next day they start with Hey again.

    • SayCyberOnceMore@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Aha! This is the way.

      I tend to reply with “Hi” at the end of my day when they’ve gone offline.

      Tomorrow, I’ll either get the real question, or, it goes another day… they’ll learn… eventually

    • NutinButNet
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      21 hours ago

      I never thought of that last part but I like it lol. I have a lot of international people who do this most and it would be perfect. Though some of them seem to wake up while I’m on, so this might backfire on me one day.

      I currently just ignore these messages. Some never take the hint and keep trying.