• splinterA
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    9 months ago

    Isn’t it crazy? You can open any generic porn site and immediately find a vast sea of women who are objectively more attractive, and you don’t have to pay anything to see them naked.

    • SJ0
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      I think we actually need to be a bit careful even with the claims. Look at the media – They kept pretending they were all brilliant and rich, then the VC money runs out. Same with a lot of the tech firms, and even some platforms like tiktok which were creating jobs being vacuous nitwits for a generation before the money ran out. Same with YouTube to an extent so a lot of people are leaving now.

      So at that point it’s like "who is actually paying these people? Is it money from actual simps, or is it largely themselves paying women out of their ad budget to attract talent and make it look like a valid career path?

      • splinterA
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        Interesting thought, it’s entirely possible that the platform itself throws the thots some coins to ensure they have enough variety.

        Though you shouldn’t underestimate the amount of simps out there. Porn is one of the few things that makes money. Though it’s still a mystery to me who the audience for this specimen is.

        • SJ0
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          9 months ago

          I have to admit I don’t know who all these guys who pay for porn are.

          Who are these people?

          • splinterA
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            9 months ago

            There are many lonely depressed dudes out there