A U.S. bankruptcy court trustee is planning to shut down Alex Jones’ Infowars media platform and liquidate its assets to help pay the $1.5 billion in lawsuit judgments Jones owes for repeatedly calling the 2012 Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting a hoax.

In an “emergency” motion filed Sunday in Houston, trustee Christopher Murray indicated publicly for the first time that he intends to “conduct an orderly wind-down” of the operations of Infowars’ parent company and “liquidate its inventory.” Murray, who was appointed by a federal judge to oversee the assets in Jones’ personal bankruptcy case, did not give a timetable for the liquidation.

Jones has been saying on his web and radio shows that he expects Infowars to operate for a few more months before it is shut down because of the bankruptcy. But he has vowed to continue his bombastic broadcasts in some other fashion, possibly on social media. He also had talked about someone else buying the company and allowing him to continue his shows as an employee.

  • airrowM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    zero hard evidence

    Well with Sandy Hook, there were videos like of one of the alleged fathers laughing and then suddenly turning serious for a camera, which led to speculation that these people were acting and not true victims. It was bizarre behavior for someone whose child just died. I get some people saying that everyone handles “trauma” differently.

    like this video: https://inv.tux.pizza/watch?v=s-ZfxxPc0r0 (you could substitute youtube.com/ for inv.tux.pizza if you want, it’s just an adless proxy)

    Other anomalies were detected like this. Certainly you can connect the dots and understand where these people are coming from in having a theory they may not have absolute proof for? Like evidence of a crime without the absolute surveillance tape that shows the crime happening? A person at the wrong place at the wrong time that a jury could convict, that kind of thing? At least do you understand the perspective such adherents of the theory have? They didn’t have “no reason” to ask questions about facts that didn’t add up, right?

    what do you think has substance in contrast?

    • SkyezOpen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      It sounds like you already understand that most of those things are bullshit.

      Other anomalies were detected like this.

      Right. And I could go down the line and debunk every one and it wouldn’t change the mind of anyone who watched Alex Jones.

      understand where these people are coming from in having a theory they may not have absolute proof for?

      That’s where the problem is. Alex Jones baselessly accused numerous people BY NAME leading to them being directly harassed and threatened.

      This is weird, therefore false flag shooting is a HUGE fucking jump that is not grounded in reality, and why he owes those people hundreds of millions of dollars.

      As a person, you are free to come up with whatever crackpot theories you want. You are not free to defame people. That’s the bottom line with respect to Jones and carlson.