Over the past few decades, the number of Americans who identify as religiously unaffiliated—often referred to as “nones”—has grown rapidly. In the 1970s, only about 5% of Americans fell into this category. Today, that number exceeds 25%. Scholars have debated whether this change simply reflects a general decline in belief, or whether it signals something more complex. The research team wanted to explore the deeper forces at play: Why are people leaving institutional religion? What are they replacing it with? And how are their personal values shaping that process?

  • samus12345@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    7 days ago

    My guess is that the extreme hatred flowing out of outspoken “Christians” in the US is a huge turn-off, as it should be.

  • Zomg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    7 days ago

    Because I don’t need God to be a good person, or know what good morals are.

    • P1k1e@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      7 days ago

      Not to mention you’ll do a better job at it if you think for yourself on the subject rather than delegating it to a spiritual leader with potentially dubious agendas

    • Bytemeister@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 days ago

      I think it was Penn Jillette who put it best…

      I murder all I want to, and the amount I want is zero

    • Itdidnttrickledown@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 days ago

      Most of us get our sense of decency from the inside. Some can only find it in a book. Which is more dangerous the person who sense of right and wrong are with them or the ones who are just one crisis of faith from not having any?

  • Doomsider@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    6 days ago

    No no no, this ancient religion from the Middle East based off of several other cultures mythology is the TRUTH!

  • Zenith@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    Everyone, myself included always come back to the same reason - there is no proof.

    If I was given actual proof of a god or pantheon or any other ridiculous nonsense I’d absolutely change my mind but actual proof magic exists can’t exist because magic isn’t real

    I fully accept that I don’t and can’t truly understand the universe but where the fuck does that somehow morph into “god did it” it’s ok not to know everything I don’t need made up bullshit to fill the gaps so I can feel better about not having every answer. Live with not knowing, that’s what being human is meant to be, acceptance

    • gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 days ago

      god definitely exists, as it’s just a philosophical concept to say the “cause of all causes”. by definition, such a thing exists, i would say.

      the issue is more with organized religion. there’s a lot of rules and bureaucracy in it, and most of that is outdated.

      • zalgotext@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 days ago

        god definitely exists, as it’s just a philosophical concept to say the “cause of all causes”.

        I hope you stretched before making that leap.

        Snark aside, this is just a dressed-up version of the “god of the gaps” argument, and is by no means proof of the existence of god. Changing the definition of “god” to be the “cause of all causes” is uselessly broad at best, and misattribution at worst - the “cause of all causes” may very well be a natural phenomenon, at which point attributing it to “god” is just straight up incorrect.

        by definition, such a thing exists, i would say.

        Actually, maybe not. There’s some new theories and evidence suggesting that it’s possible that the universe is eternal, as in it has always existed, making the existence of a “cause of all causes” impossible (unless of course you also water down the definition of that phrase to the point where it’s meaningless).

      • richieadler 🇦🇷@lemmy.myserv.one
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 days ago

        god definitely exists, as it’s just a philosophical concept to say the “cause of all causes”.

        Most believers will assert that their god exists in a different, more concrete way. The number of persons able or willing to discuss the topic on your terms is an insignificant minority.

  • Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    Here’s my theory why:

    • People nowadays have higher average education and can much more easilly spot the logical inconsistences in Religion.
    • People are so overexposed and overwhelmed by swindles in the modern era that they are more naturally spotting the swindle nature of ancient swindles such as Religion.
  • fireweed@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    7 days ago

    For their study, Schnabel and his colleagues used data from the National Study of Youth and Religion. This included four waves of longitudinal survey data and 183 in-depth interviews conducted from 2003 to 2013. The sample included over 1,300 individuals, each tracked from adolescence into young adulthood. […] The number of respondents attending religious services dropped dramatically between 2003 and 2013.

    The study used data that’s 12 years old! Millennials are not young adults anymore. At this point it’s well known that Americans, especially the younger cohorts, are moving away from religion, so why even bother reanalyzing ancient data?

    • stoly@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      7 days ago

      It is very useful to reanalyze old data. Recently, a study came out that concluded that we have misunderstood the role of nutrition and calories in fitness, and it examined studies over a period of decades to come to the conclusions. You don’t always need new data to make new conclusions.

      • fireweed@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        The role nutrition in fitness isn’t likely to change in twelve years; the role of, say, politics in affecting one’s religious affiliation absolutely will.

    • Zenith@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      Gen Z is more religious and conservative, than millennials, a lot more

        • Captain Aggravated@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 days ago

          I’m not sure they got to play the tutorial levels that we did.

          A lot of us millennials had hotmail accounts that got the actual stereotypical Nigerian Prince emails. They were obvious as shit, so we learned to put our guard up. Gen Z came of age into a world full of pig butchering scams and other such sophisticated shit.

  • Soapbox@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    6 days ago

    I was a skeptical little kid, and I have been an atheist since I first learned of the term around 1st grade. I was also very interested in archeology and mythology, so exposure to all those other religions didn’t help the Christianity case. As a child, I assumed that the whole god/jesus thing was just like Santa and the Easter Bunny. That it was a made up story to instill morals in kids, and that eventually when I was older the adults would admit it to me. Of course, they never did. But I had a lot of friends at church and generally enjoyed my time there, so I didn’t openly talk about being an atheist until college.

    I actually do kind of miss the community aspect of a church. I have always assumed that is the biggest draw that keeps people interested. Both for the support network, and sense of belonging.

  • lemonaz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    7 days ago

    They have tech now. And conspiracy theories. Lots of stuff to cult about. They can build their own religion if they want.

      • Ushmel@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        Not if you actually tithe 10% like they want you to and have insurance and/or community support. Which of course not everyone has. But my point is that more insurance covers it now than 30 years ago.