So I look in the modlog from time to time. There’s been some actions I’ve seen that I don’t agree with, but there is no way to see the context, so I’ve never spoke up. But today I saw something that concerned me. I’m just going to copy/paste the modlog so you see what I see.

Banned AwkwardLookMonkeyPuppet from the community >Technology@midwest.social reason: Lib expires: in 1 year mod

Banned AwkwardLookMonkeyPuppet from the community >Indiana@midwest.social reason: Lib expires: in 1 year mod Banned

AwkwardLookMonkeyPuppet from the community >Chat@midwest.social reason: Lib expires: in 1 year mod

Banned AwkwardLookMonkeyPuppet from the community Socialist Rifle >Association@midwest.social reason: Lib expires: in 1 year mod

Banned AwkwardLookMonkeyPuppet from the community >Antifascism@midwest.social reason: Lib expires: in 1 year mod

Banned AwkwardLookMonkeyPuppet from the community >Michigan@midwest.social reason: Lib expires: in 1 year mod

Banned AwkwardLookMonkeyPuppet from the community Lord of the >memes@midwest.social reason: Lib expires: in 1 year mod

Banned AwkwardLookMonkeyPuppet from the community Ohio@midwest.social reason: Lib expires: in 1 year mod

Banned AwkwardLookMonkeyPuppet from the community United States | >News & Politics@midwest.social reason: Lib expires: in 1 year mod

Banned AwkwardLookMonkeyPuppet from the community The >Onion@midwest.social reason: Lib expires: in 1 year mod

Banned AwkwardLookMonkeyPuppet from the community Religious >Cringe@midwest.social reason: Lib expires: in 1 year mod

Banned AwkwardLookMonkeyPuppet from the community >Iowa@midwest.social reason: Lib expires: in 1 year mod

Banned AwkwardLookMonkeyPuppet from the community >Memes@midwest.social reason: Lib expires: in 1 year mod

Banned AwkwardLookMonkeyPuppet from the community >Minnesota@midwest.social reason: Lib expires: in 1 year mod

Banned >AwkwardLookMonkeyPuppet from the community Food Crimes - >Offenses against >nutrition@midwest.social reason: Lib expires: in 1 year

I don’t know who this guy is, or who the mod is, but essentially this guy is getting banned for being liberal.

Or am I misreading the situation???

  • AnarchoSnowPlow@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    4 months ago

    Each instance gets to be its own fiefdom to an extent. If you’re shitty enough to a wide enough audience or you tolerate shitty users you might be defederated, but for the most part as a mod you get to decide the rules for your server.

    In this particular instance the mod decided to ban someone for whatever reason, maybe it was being a lib, maybe they were annoying a mod, it doesn’t really matter.

    The cool thing is that you can avoid the instance if you want, or block it so you don’t have to see anything from it, or start your own instance with blackjack… And hookers. The options are unlimited.

    • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 months ago

      So you’re saying there’s no holding mods accountable for their actions. We can only leave.

      Seems like thats counter intuitive to growing Lemmy.

      • ZagamTheVile@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        4 months ago

        Just leave the instance, not the fed. It can be seen to help grow it. You’re free to start your own instance and allow/disallow anyone for any reason. Remember that there isn’t 1 Lemmy. It’s not like reddit where there’s one site. It’s more like a whole shitton of very similar sites that overlap. So one rogue mod is messing up a News, just ban that instance and find another one.

      • AnarchoSnowPlow@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        4 months ago

        It’s counterintuitive to growing an instance maybe.

        The whole idea is that there is no centralization.

        It (the fediverse) is de-centralized.

        The point is that there’s no one entity in charge.

        You don’t have to leave the fediverse because you don’t like an instance. You’re free to start your own communities and/or instances anywhere else, no one is obligated to tolerate anyone and everyone in their space.

  • seahorse [Ohio]@midwest.socialM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    4 months ago

    I banned them for reporting a post about killing nazis for being against site rules (it’s not) and for the offending post “glorifying violence”. I don’t need that neolib shit on this instance. I did not know it was going to list every community on this instance they’re now banned from in the modlog.

    • Alice
      shield
      A
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      So you are inciting violence ? Yea nazis (real ones not ppl you just disagree with politically)

      Are evil people.

      But you are no different from them as you are calling for violence. There’s other ways to deal with shitty people that doesn’t involve murder.

      You are in the wrong here.

    • Zagorath@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 months ago

      Had the user reported stuff like that before and been told specifically that it wasn’t rule-breaking? Jumping straight to banning someone who may have genuinely thought they were being helpful seems like an unfair extreme response.

      • Alice
        shield
        A
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        Centralization. Or NOSTR. Think about it, federation is just millions of tyrant admins and mods and reddit is just one.

        You can join our Instance we’re pretty chill. You can look at our modlog too. We rarely ban and remove stuff. I understand you might not be interested and that’s ok.