DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works to Ask Lemmy@lemmy.world · 15 天前Does anyone actually take into account "IP Rating"/"Water Resistance" when they buy phones?message-squaremessage-square91linkfedilinkarrow-up1104arrow-down11
arrow-up1103arrow-down1message-squareDoes anyone actually take into account "IP Rating"/"Water Resistance" when they buy phones?DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works to Ask Lemmy@lemmy.world · 15 天前message-square91linkfedilink
minus-squareDeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.worksOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·15 天前Well, it already has IP68 anyways so you got that covered :D
minus-squarePerspectivist@feddit.uklinkfedilinkarrow-up11·15 天前Allegedly so. Looking at that rubber seal behind the flimsy back cover doesn’t inspire much confidence however so I’ll keep treating it as if that rating doesn’t exist.
minus-squarenovibe@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·edit-215 天前What’s the requirement that only this phone covers?.. If it’s not being more “resistant”? Its whole point seems to be to be rugged.
minus-squarePerspectivist@feddit.uklinkfedilinkarrow-up12·15 天前Has removable battery and a headphone jack.
What’s your one option btw?
Carrier pigeons.
They also don’t work underwater.
Carrier salmon.
XCover 6 Pro
Well, it already has IP68 anyways so you got that covered :D
Allegedly so. Looking at that rubber seal behind the flimsy back cover doesn’t inspire much confidence however so I’ll keep treating it as if that rating doesn’t exist.
What’s the requirement that only this phone covers?.. If it’s not being more “resistant”? Its whole point seems to be to be rugged.
Has removable battery and a headphone jack.
xkcd phone