Like seriously, time is money right? I’m sure most people can relate to wasting time on numerous applications before ever landing a job. If they set that into law, employers will probably be much less likely to reject applicants, and even when they do, you still get paid for your wasted time.
Edit: I’m not particularly referring to the application part alone, I’m referring to application + interview = rejection. People should get paid for someone calling you in, only to end up wasting your time. Hell, I could have spent that time better at the sperm bank.
You’re volunteering to apply though…
Right, because “if you don’t get a job, you get to live in a cardboard box under a bridge” isn’t duress at all.
I’m not saying I’m for OP’s plan. I’m still thinking it through. But there’s nothing “voluntary” about working for a paycheck, or about applying to do so.
That’s what unemployment is for. :) It’s not on the business to pay applicants.
The last time I had unemployment, it was a lousy $64 per week, and only for 3 months no less. Unemployment is a joke.
Depends on your income before you were unemployed… My wife is drawing it right now and it’s something like $450 a week for her.
I was working for 6 days a week, 6 hours a day, for $10 per hour, for over 2 years. Yes, $10 an hour sounds like chump change these days, but this was back in like 2007.
Still…
Ah yes, only 17% what I make in a week at a job. Surely that’ll keep my household running efficiently
Yes, true that. I was more specifically refering to the interview part, being a pure waste of time if you’re rejected. And if it was an in-person interview, you’ve not only wasted time, but very likely have burned gas going there and back.
You know the saying “When you don’t have a job, your only job is to get a job”? Yeah, I think that saying is about a load of horse shit. If looking for a job is considered a job itself, then I feel people should get paid for their wasted time.
Or, ya know, don’t have a system where someone files 73 job applications only to get basically nowhere.
In Germany, they all pay for travel expenses, at least.
I don’t know if that’s the law, but it certainly isn’t what I’d consider a Crazy Idea.This doesn’t encourage application processes to be simplified. If anything it will dramatically increase the difficulty in applying for jobs and provide more economic incentives for nepotism.
There are laws against nepotism, at least in the USA.
https://www.mspb.gov/studies/studies/Preventing_Nepotism_in_the_Federal_Civil_Service_1315054.pdf
Granted those laws apparently apply only at the federal level (plus I’m no expert in the subject), nepotism should outright be illegal across the board.
Everyone should have a fair and equal chance to gain employment, without all the bullshit many suffer while seeking an honest job.
Meıbı ė pṙſent v it ƿᵫd bı moṙ vuıėbėl. Ðiſ ƿᵫd krıeıt ė precṙ f kėmpenız t dju̇ſt limit ð nu̇mbṙ v æplikeıcėnz Ðı’l teık.
spoiler
Maybe a percent of it would be more viable. This would create a pressure for companies to just limit the number of applications they’ll take.
Ok…but now what if I just start applying at really really high paying jobs, thus getting 1 hour at 4000 dollars an hour for a CEO position, while I have no experience in that field, and a GED.
And then I just apply for 40 jobs I’ll never get simply by mass applying. On indeed you just need to upload your resume once, and then click a button. 20 resumes in an hour wojldn’t be hard, but now you have 20 hours of billable time. So I work one day every 2 weeks, and never have a job.
Google and Indeed apparently files my job application responses as spam. Fuck online applications, I wanna talk to a human, in person.
