• jawa21@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    63
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Never underestimate the bandwidth of a station wagon full of tapes hurtling down the hiway.

    • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Ages ago, there was a time where my dad would mail back up tapes for offsite storage because their databases were large enough that it was faster to put it through snail mail.

      It should also be noted his databases were huge, (they’d be bundled into 70 pound packages and shipped certified.)

      • Valmond@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 month ago

        Just a couple of years ago I was sent a dataset by mail, around 1TB on a hard drive.

        Later I worked on visualization of large datasets, we didn’t have the space to store them locally because they were up to a PB.

        • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 month ago

          We’re storing data in peanut butter? Please tell me there’s jam involved.

          /j it’s amazing we’re talking about petabytes. My first computer had like 600 meg. (Pentium 486 cobbled out of spare- old- parts from my dad’s junk”Parts” rack.)

          • Valmond@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 month ago

            😁 ya my first “computer” was a ZX-81 with 1kB of ram, type too much and it was full! A card with a whopping 16kB later came to the rescue.

            It’s been a wild time in history.

        • uis@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          Mail dataset in standard-compliant way. Like RFC1149. Don’t forget that carrier should be avian carrier.

          we didn’t have the space to store them locally because they were up to a PB.

          Local is very vague word. It can be argued, that anything, that doesn’t fit into L1 cache is not local.

          • Valmond@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 month ago

            Local as not in the building in that case :-)

            RFC1149 lol yeah wasn’t that a norwegian experiment at some sub-bits per second? Thanks for making me remember!

            • uis@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 month ago

              Some african with megabits per second. Which was much faster than any local ISP.