This is especially true with luxury brands like Louis Vuitton, Gucci, and Prada. People are either trying to impress others with fakes, or they’ve actually paid full price to become walking billboards.

Similar thing with iPhone cases that have a cutout for the Apple logo. That’s just hilarious.

  • ContrarianTrail@lemm.eeOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    25 days ago

    my wife does know about brands and will point out when someone is wearing over £20000 in their outfit

    Here’s the difference: that 20k outfit doesn’t have logos all over it. Your average SUPREME enjoyer isn’t going to recognize an outfit like that - only those truly informed on the matter, or other wealthy individuals, would. It’s like wearing an entry-level Rolex; it hardly impresses anyone. A true baller wears an unassuming Patek Philippe. There are those pretending to be wealthy who can only fool poor people, and then there are those who may not seem wealthy at a glance, but those in the know can tell.

    • vinnymac@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      25 days ago

      African American culture is the antithesis to your argument. Even the most wealthy individuals sporting logos of all kinds, literally as status symbols.

      I agree that people have become walking billboards, but I don’t think it’s always black and white in fashion, it’s much more complex than “rich people don’t wear logos”

      • marx2k@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        25 days ago

        “African American culture is the antithesis to your argument. Even the most wealthy individuals sporting logos of all kinds, literally as status symbols.”

        Really you’re describing the difference between striking it rich and generational wealth.

        • vinnymac@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          25 days ago

          Sure am, but we are discussing wealthy people and what they wear in this thread.

          We can be nuanced about the 1% all day and start talking about a different group in that 1% but it doesn’t change the fact that they are all rich and some of them wear logos does it?