• Dasus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 days ago

    Idk.

    Any of the dozens of times the US has engaged a military in the last 50 years?

    • andyortlieb@lemmy.sdf.orgOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      Yeah, I think asymmetric warfare is they key word I was grasping for.

      I guess I wonder what other games, besides geopolitical competitions (or conflicts specifically) represent similar asymmetry

  • iii@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    Hemingway and the FBI.

    Near the end of his life, he was back in the US. Thought he was being shadowed. Took therapy, medicine, treatment for hypertention.

    Years later, it turned out that he was being shadowed. The man was working on his mental health, confirmed by doctors to be paranoia. The FBI was shadowing him because of his work in cuba.

  • Call me Lenny/Leni@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    3 days ago

    During pre-colonial times, the French and the British went over to America. Their domains overlapped on the Canadian border where the Iroquois nation (actual emphasis on “nation”) lived, and a three way war began between the three nations, since the British wanted to spread itself (because did you expect anything else from them) and the French were trying to establish outposts while the Iroquois didn’t like intrusion on what it considered to be a neat system it built, even though they didn’t have as much issue with the actual missions.

    The Iroquois, believe it or not, were champion warriors and pretty much wiping the floor against both of them until thirteen of the twenty colonies (yes, there were twenty colonies, not thirteen) started to rise up, and the British sided with the natives they realized were the powerhouse they were. The only issue is those natives were still susceptible to internal strife which allowed the to-be United States to win and take Upstate New York (which was the Iroquois homeland, and yes, the border between the conquered parts of New York and the parts that were in the state precolonially would objectively be the most correct line to mark where Downstate officially ends) and Vermont (which was claimed by the Iroquois but never formal territory). The British, having lost, left the area and gave the natives the cold shoulder because the natives were still viewed as barbarians, even up to the establishment of the league of nations hundreds of years later where those natives were denied membership (since the Iroquois rump state in exile still exists).

    Of note, I really shouldn’t be calling them the Iroquois (their name was the Haudenosaunee), Iroqu was the Algonquin word for “serpent” (the Algonquins were like the Russia to the Haudenosaunee’s Ukraine) and was a slur the French unknowingly picked up and popularized/coined, but very few people would connect the dots if I just referred to them as the Haudenosaunee.

        • MagicShel@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          3 days ago

          Neoliberalism is often associated with a set of economic liberalization policies, including privatizationderegulationconsumer choiceglobalizationfree trademonetarismausterity, and reductions in government spending. These policies are designed to increase the role of the private sector in the economy and society.

          These things? Your position is the American people rejected her over these things? In favor of Trump?

          Look, I don’t know what happened this election, but I don’t see anything here I think the American people would object to. Maybe globalization.

            • MagicShel@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              2 days ago

              I did. I understand that there is intellectual criticism of neo-liberalism. I don’t even necessarily disagree with that criticism. I just don’t see any evidence that the vast majority of people actually care.

              I just don’t think that’s why. That said, I’ll acknowledge that maybe you’re right and I’m wrong.

              • KaTaRaNaGa@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                2 days ago

                I appreciate your sincerity. Please accept mine:

                What do you think the vast majority of people care about?

                • surewhynotlem@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  2 days ago

                  That they don’t trust a black chick.

                  I honestly think it’s more likely that more people are at least moderately racist, and fewer people are knowledgeable about neoliberalism to the point of having an opinion, let alone changing their vote for it.

                  Always bet on stupid.

                • MagicShel@lemmy.zip
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  If I had a real answer to that, I’d be a lot less confused by the election. I mean it most likely comes down to, as it always has, “it’s the economy, stupid.”

                  If I had to take a guess, all of these massive disagreements online about Gaza and immigration and regulation, to say nothing of Trumps general… terribleness all around… even abortion—it seems to me that all of these issues amount to a few 1/10ths of a percent.

                  I guess if the economy is good, we keep the administration. If it’s bad, we toss it. And that seems, from my perspective, to be the only thing that matters at all to the electorate. It seems crazy to me that no one is looking into the future to see what is coming.

                  Anyone who truly cared about the future economy would run screaming from tariffs, so I guess it’s just really about punishing a bad economy, no matter what.

                  I wish there was another explanation that presented itself. Something to help me understand that didn’t mean the country is a bunch of idiots. But I’ve got nothing.

      • ouRKaoS@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        That’s actually the one I own! It’s a blast and full of little D&D references, but you don’t have to know anything about D&D to play.

  • je_skirata@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    3 days ago

    The movie “Pirates of the Caribbean: On Stranger Tides” comes to mind.

    All the major characters are racing to find the Fountain of Youth, but all for different reasons. It’s a very entertaining movie.

    The spoiler reasons for each:

    Tap for spoiler

    The British want to find the Fountain to stop the Spanish from getting it.

    The Spanish want to find the Fountain to destroy it.

    Blackbeard wants to find the Fountain to use it to live forever.

    Blackbeard’s daughter wants the Fountain for her father.

    Jack Sparrow wants to find the Fountain so Blackbeard doesn’t kill him. (And also to save Blackbeard’s daughter.)

    Barbossa wants to find the Fountain so that he can kill Blackbeard. (And also he sides with the British to accomplish his revenge).