• toiletobserver@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    190
    ·
    13 days ago

    Because those never would falsely identify anything? Because youtube does it so well? Because data isn’t encrypted?

    On what planet does this make sense?

    • Pika@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      81
      ·
      13 days ago

      I’m sorry I can’t hear you over at the sounds of capitalism not caring about people being hit in the crossfire.

      Green line must go up

    • rottingleaf@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      13 days ago

      On the “I dunno how you’ll do it, but you better find a way, bitch” planet.

      Frankly something just went wrong in the first place from the very beginning.

      They shouldn’t have any input on how infrastructure works. Especially “automated blocking”. You want to sue someone, do that. Messing with infrastructure without a court is just nuts, and if someone’s doing it, I hope there is another guy with Italian ancestry living nearby.

      • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        13 days ago

        Doesn’t have to be Itailian. I’m not picky about supporting modern day Robinhood’s, regardless of background.

    • Strykker@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      12 days ago

      Also just ignore that core routers are super specialized to moving packets as fast as possible. Having to inspect every packet would ruin them, and literally nuke service speeds across the country.

  • jubilationtcornpone@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    169
    ·
    13 days ago

    I would like to once again thank the motion picture and recording industry associations for their contributions to both the sophistication of media piracy and the quality of content.

    Without their efforts, we would probably all still be playing Russian Roulette on Limewire for a low quality copy of Zoolander. The first person to record a movie on Betamax would probably shit themselves if they could have seen what could be accomplished with some arrogance, incompetence, and blind greed. There’s no doubt that you guys are the real MVP when it comes to promoting media piracy.

    The anti-piracy industry couldn’t be more Mickey Mouse if it were run by the Marx Brothers.

    • 9point6@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      80
      ·
      edit-2
      13 days ago

      Piracy is a service problem.

      Provide a good enough service and people won’t want to pirate. Anyone that still does in that scenario probably was never going to be a sale anyway.

      Provide a bad service and people who would have happily paid get pushed towards piracy. The more people pirating, the better the tools get as you say.

      People just want all their shit in one place for a reasonable fee.

      It’s not rocket science, they already were there back when Netflix was new, they just let it get shit.

      • IphtashuFitz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        37
        ·
        edit-2
        13 days ago

        AKA greed. Why license your content to Netflix when you can have your own streaming service and lock your viewers into your piddly little hoard of content?

        Just how many streaming providers are there today? That number likely changes almost daily at this point…

      • Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        11 days ago

        The studios should release their own tracker with a premium file and send everyone a quarterly bill who uses it. I would pay it if it were reasonable… it’s only extra money for them.

      • jjjalljs@ttrpg.network
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        12 days ago

        People just want all their shit in one place for a reasonable fee.

        One problem with this is that monopolies are bad.

        I’m not sure what the ideal solution is. It’s not “12 different services each charging $12/month” though.

        I don’t think regular capitalism can really solve this.

        • Fedegenerate@lemmynsfw.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          edit-2
          12 days ago

          Compete on the service. All streamers have access to stream essentially whatever and they compete on price, quality and value added service.

          Music streaming is almost there imo, if they paid the artists more, you want the highest quality? Go to tidal. You want infinite playlists? Deezer flow is where to go. You want podcasts? Spotify… I kid, Spotify’s ease of conectivity is an industry envy. But they all have, essentially, the same music, if you allow essentially to do some work.

          • jjjalljs@ttrpg.network
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            12 days ago

            I’m an outlier in that I buy music on Bandcamp. Renting music feels like a bad deal to me, but for some people it might work out.

            I think I repeat listen to albums a lot more than I repeat watch stuff.

            Still, I’d consider a service that was like “pay $10 for this movie and it’s yours, drm free, forever”. A quick search shows WandaVision on DVD is like $50, and you’d have to like rip and self host yourself to stream it.

            I think the subscription model is often user hostile, but it’s very lucrative

            • Fedegenerate@lemmynsfw.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              12 days ago

              Deezer flow has completely replaced commercial radio for me, except the DJ is at my behest. I listen to the radio at work and while driving, then albums at home.

          • grandma@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            12 days ago

            Exactly, most of my irl friends pirate shows/tv but they all have spotify. Im considered “extra” by them for pirating music

        • kent_eh@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          12 days ago

          It’s not “12 different services each charging $12/month” though.

          Add to that content that is geolocked behind a pay wall that isn’t even made avaliable to access in my country.

          “So you won’t make it possible for me to pay you for your content… Ok, I’ll just figure it out myself”.

    • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      12 days ago

      Jesus Christ on a pogo stick.

      This entire system immediately fails as soon as someone uses a VPN.

      All pirates will use VPN, so this horrorshow of a system literally just only punishes innocent people

      Great going, assholes.

  • MehBlah@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    57
    ·
    edit-2
    12 days ago

    Of course they do. They don’t want to pay for it. They just want it done at no extra cost to them. Just like copyright strikes against internet users.

    I worked for a ISP and we started demanding money to roll a truck to hand those shitty things to our customers. We would tell the customer that they have no idea who they are and if they don’t respond they never will. We stopped getting so many strikes. The absolute shittiest ones I spoke with were the ones with the Grateful Dead’s lead singers family trust.

    None of them ever paid for us to roll a truck. None of them ever served a subpoena.

  • 9tr6gyp3@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    52
    ·
    13 days ago

    Funny thing about the internet is we can just find a different route. Fucking idiots.

      • bobs_monkey@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        61
        ·
        13 days ago

        That’s not exactly how it works. There is no specific core, all web traffic doesn’t go through one centralized location; it gets routed through the most direct route on each if these routers’ routing tables

        • yeehaw@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          12 days ago

          My point is, if you’re blocked traversing the routers across the sea you’re not reaching those other continents. That’s a bit of a simplistic way of looking at it, given satellite internet and stuff but my point is it is not that incredibly hard to block the routes. Especially with BGP. BGP on the internet also has some bodies regulating route ASN reputation, so those could be potentially null routed.

          Anyways, I clearly have no clue what I’m talking about so I’ll stop there.

        • credo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          12 days ago

          You can poison the routes within the BGP core to send traffic into a black hole. Basically, just tell everyone you have the best path, and they will send traffic to you.

          There have been instances of this at the international level with adversary nations “accidentally” routing all traffic through them first. It can be done to a degree that it makes life difficult. They won’t be able to prevent you from finding a VPN that pops you out near a router that refuses the poisoned routes however- not without a global agreement at least.

      • TexMexBazooka@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 days ago

        Internet infrastructure in the US in particular isn’t a monolith like that. A “core router” is a high capacity router in an autonomous system that will usually communicate with other core routers in other systems, owned by different and often competing entities

  • Jesus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    52
    ·
    13 days ago

    “Copyright industry” is such a weird term. Why not use the term everyone already knows, media companies.

    • webghost0101@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      38
      ·
      13 days ago

      Intellect gatekeepers. Killers of progress.

      They somehow believe that ideas and concepts can be owned by one person only, barring everyone else who is doing something similar.

      Freedom of thought and freedom of expression requires freedom from intellectual property.

    • General_Effort@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      13 days ago

      It’s not the same. There’s all those lawyers specialized in copyright. Companies that track down “piracy”. Then there’s rights owners like the Disney corporation or JK Rowling. Rights management firms. Online platforms like Getty or Adobe.

  • bokherif@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    ·
    12 days ago

    Right, like a router can unencrypt and read what’s on the link. This is just IP blocks which will never work lol.

    • Semperverus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      12 days ago

      “Hey there customer, if you want internet access on our network (the only one available in your area), you have to install our intermediary certificate on your machine!”

  • vane@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    11 days ago

    I remember the times when you could rent a videotape or cassette tape and then copy it to yours or even record it straight from tv or radio and everyone was earning decent money. How it happened that we turned culture into bureaucracy ?