I think the … here is meant to represent repeating digits.
I think the … here is meant to represent repeating digits.
This is what people don’t seem to get. Human nature is when things are bad we band together, when things are good, we compete against each other. Capitalism leverages the latter while communism just tries to ignore that it exists.
Capitalism certainly has its flaws, but it’s a far better starting point.
Because you were like the fourth person to tell me to get takeout after I explained it in the comments multiple times.
My bad. I did search for “drive” and “pick” and saw nothing. But apparently I didn’t scroll down so all of the comments weren’t loaded.
I didn’t?
No, you didn’t. That was your explanation as to why you couldn’t cook. I presumed one reason you got pizza was because it was a smell you could tolerate. Expecting people to understand that your reasoning for not cooking was the same reason for not driving is ridiculous.
I respect that and it makes sense. Why you had to be such a prick about it is beyond me.
You didn’t head off the question as to why you didn’t just pick it up. It looks your delivery costs were a whopping 28% of the total. If you ain’t cooking, you’ve probably got the time to drive. Or better yet walk or bike (obviously only if it’s close enough).
But that being said, I recommend always considering getting a large pie. Remember, the area grows with r2
So for 6 extra dollars (to get the 16 inch) you get the equivalent of 2.5 10" pizzas. And you have some leftovers. Granted this doesn’t make sense if no one else is going to eat it but her, but even going to a medium, you get almost an extra half pizza for 2 dollars. That probably would buy at least a second meal out of it for her.
During the period when inflation was real hot, my wife got a 35% pay raise and I got around a 28% pay raise. We beat inflation by a long shot.
Should I recognize that my situation was the representative of the general economy? Or should I say something like “my personal situation reflects the general state of people in the economy” and then argue that wage growth was outpacing inflation?
Wage growth has been outpacing inflation for well over a year now in the us. The issue is that there was a huge spike of inflation during the pandemic and many people have fallen far behind so there is a lot of catching up to do.
I didn’t say they were the same thing; my whole point is that they are different. We’re talking about people thinking they’re talking to a human, compared to people attributing a single human attribute to a spoon. But probably not even really for the latter because if you ask someone if the spoon is actually sad, most everyone will say no.
You ask someone if the ugly spoon is human, they know it’s not.
We asked people if they were talking to a human, and it said yes.
These are not the same.
I see it as the opposite, and now that it’s getting uncomfortably close to seeming human, that makes people uncomfortable and so we are rejecting the turing test in favor of… what? It seems like nothing. It’s convenient that what makes us human is intangible.
You’re confusing the belief that their faith trumps education with reject education altogether.
Your answer is right in the pictures: if they think any education is bad, they also would think any religion is bad, because the first picture says the same thing about religion that the second does about religion. So this would mean Christianity is bad.
It’s clear they are saying that these are tools the devil uses. But just because the devil uses a hammer, doesn’t mean the hammer itself is bad.
Im way too sexy to be a robot.
For anyone who didn’t read it.
The article is about him claiming that the judge is a tyrant for threatening to exclude testimony, not actually doing so. There are some vague references to the judge being “unfair” about what evidence it allowed from the prosecution vs the defense, but no concrete examples given. Then some whining about “fake news.” That’s it. That’s the whole thing. He was shocked by nothing actually happening, and then some vague
I swear it’s actually the opposite where they are like “it’s only one pixel, it doesn’t count.” And does the guy on the bike count? It seems like no matter what I do - unless I get through on the first try - it’s wrong, and I’m clicking for what seems like an hour.
I’m not sure if they changed, or my taste changed, but the fries are almost inedible to me now. They smell fantastic still, but they just taste so fake.
Itt, people being downvoted for answering the question.
Gotta love Lemmy. Lol
Many items in cocktails also have long shelf lives after opening or are cheap/move quickly.
This is why I think we see variations on actual cocktails so much…you have it, it’s open, so move it.
Is this coming from experience or are you just kind of guessing? There are plenty of cocktails that use non-shelf stable stuff that you can get anywhere. On top of that, the new movement towards providing non-alcoholic drinks on the menu just reuses these same ingredients in different ways.
I feel like this joke would have landed better 5, or maybe even 3 years ago. Every even remotely fancy restaurant I go into has jumped on the mocktail bandwagon and offers plenty of options for people avoiding alcohol.
Can I get a citation on this? Because it doesn’t pass the sniff test for me. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Approximation