Thinking about this because of a greentext I saw earlier complaining about OF models.

It feels like a lot of the stigma surrounding sex work in the modern day (that doesn’t just boil down to misogyny/gender norms/religion) is based on the fact that selling intimate aspects of one’s self places a set value on something that many see as sacred; something that shouldn’t have monetary value.

Not to say anything about the economic validity of a society without currency, but I think that, hypothetically, if that were to exist, sex work would be less stigmatized since this would no longer be a factor. Those engaged in sex work would be more likely to be seen as doing it because it’s something they are good at/enjoy, and less because it’s an “easy” way to make money, as some think. It would also eliminate the fear of placing set value on social, non sex-work related intimacy (not that those fears were well-founded to begin with).

  • DharkStare@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    3 days ago

    I don’t think you’d have prostitution in a currencyless society. They wouldn’t be prostitutes at that point.

    • Plopp@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      3 days ago

      You don’t need currency for it to be prostitution. Prostitution is exchanging sex for goods, services or currency.

    • Ibaudia@lemmy.world
      cake
      OP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      There are more forms of sex work than just prostitution, though. Porn, sex surrogacy, etc. People can find those rewarding outside monetary incentive.