Engineer: 2, but 3 to be safe.
The budget is for 1.5, make it work.
Oh, hi Boeing Manager.
Was going to say: 2ish
1+1=3 in cases of large 1’s
You can’t put an expression on the left-hand-side of the assignment operator.
You need more expressive languages.
You forgot accountant
“What do you need it to be?”
We need to report negative earnings so we don’t have to pay taxes obviously
I’m surprised the 6 year old knows factorials.
Not only that, it is mathematically correct, at least given the usual definitions of 1, 2, +, and !
Terrence Howard : 2 !! Also 1x1=2 !!
Computer Scientist: 0 and a carry bit
Mathematician: S(1)
How would a two year old know factorials?
What’s great is the kid is correct even with the factorial
Appliance salesperson: oven + pan = hamburger
I appreciate the latex-style quotes around the mathematician’s 1
Math isn’t induction. Its deductive logic.
How old this be inductive reasoning?
Surely the philosopher is the one looking for definitions…
