• db2@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    2 months ago

    Our society has affirmed that antisocial shit is antithetic to the concept of society.

    Now if we could only get the sociopathic politicians/finance bros to understand that we’d be in pretty good shape.

  • VulKendov@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    2 months ago

    I mean you can’t really go throwing soup around and expect everyone to be ok with it. Anyway protesters get arrested all the time, it’s kinda the point.

  • MeatPilot@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    I do agree something needs done about climate change. But as someone who deeply appreciates art and understands how important it is to preserve it, I think protesters have a lot more avenue’s to gain attention AND actually target something related to climate change.

    Why not go throw soup on a representative or maybe throw soup on the door of a famous municipal building. Target government, they ultimately make the decisions.

    • WIZARD POPE💫@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 months ago

      The issue is that does not get as much attention and publicity.

      The problem with their approach however is that it makes everyone hate them.

    • masquenox@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      I think protesters have a lot more avenue’s to gain attention AND actually target something related to climate change.

      You mean… apart from targeting the stuff capitalists put a lot of monetary value on? You know… the same capitalist parasites that caused climate change?

      But as someone who deeply appreciates art

      Fuck art.

  • intensely_human@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    They threw soup on Sunflowers?? But it had glass over it right?

    edit: just looked it up. the painting had glass over it and wasn’t damaged. The frame got damaged a little. The frame was added in 1999, but was made in the 17th century.

    • Ifera@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 months ago

      Honestly, I agree with you and with them. They chose said painting because it is incredibly expensive, so it represents how much people are willing to pay for a painting, while not doing an effort to care for the world we live in.

      According to my sources, another reason was that the painting was encased in glass, so they saw it as a great target for the stunt, to get attention, while not causing any damage to the actual work of art.

      So, the message being “Look at how much you people’s care about us “destroying” a work of art, but nobody gives a shit about the people who are destroying the world”.

      • intensely_human@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        And lo and behold, we’re also willing to spend money as a society to keep these scum locked up.

        Happy to pay my part of that bill.

        • ddh@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          The scum trying to save our world at great personal cost, not the scum destroying it for profit?