I think a little clarification is needed. No. I don’t actually think everyone there is insane. I don’t care about the bans so stop trying to use that. HB enthusiasts coming here and trying to call me out achieves nothing besides proving my point

Edit: Feel free to keep trying to brigade me. It’s not going to scare me to take this down

  • Lvxferre@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    39
    ·
    edit-2
    13 days ago

    Childish? Kinda. Insane? No.

    There are three relevant things to say about hexbear.

    1. It is not a serious instance. Or at least not completely serious; they’re mostly there for memes, funposting, “I know that feel” etc.

    So they’re less like the meeting room of a communist party than like the bar where those communists hang out and drink beer, after the meeting is over.

    I feel like this is often misinterpreted, as HB users say something that is mostly a taunt and others interpret as actual argumentation. And it also tends to attract younger users, who… well, behave like young people?

    2. Even if not a serious instance, they’re serious about their views. Your typical HB user is communist, antifa, vegan, anti-cop, and interprets things in a very specific way. They’re rather transparent about it.

    And, because of #1, they aren’t really willing to spend their time entertaining anyone’s counterpoints. It’ll be interpreted as sealioning or similar.

    3. Hexbear was already its own thing before federation. As such it developed social norms that often conflict with the norms typically found in the rest of the Threadiverse (Lemmy, Mbin, Piefed etc.)

    For example, even if Lemmy as a whole is prone to intrusive political discussions, HB users tend to do it far more. Because they’re used to an environment where this is typically taken as OK.


    When it comes to dealing with HB users here, my advice is the exact same as dealing with other users:

    • if you don’t like what someone is saying (because it’s idiotic, obstrusive, or whatever), block the person for some peace of mind.
    • if you’re consistently uninterested on the content coming from an instance, block the instance.
    • archomrade [he/him]@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      13 days ago

      This is the most reasonable response.

      A lot of people here have long since made up their mind about hexbear based both on repeated meta posting on the topic and possibly a bad experience or two with them on a topic they assumed was uncontested but is a landmine topic for communists of a particular bent

      I’ve personally never had a bad experience with hexbears, possibly because I’m more empathetic to their perspective, but more likely because I know when it’s time to disengage. There are users on lemmy who feel strongly about a certain topic that’s abrasive to hexbear users and dig in their heels when jeered at (or maybe feel a personal responsibility to stand them down) and are usually the users here who have the most complaints, because the standard reaction from hexbear users is irreverence (both the users and the mods).

      Unlike a lot of liberals coming from reddit, communists often don’t have delusions about the neutrality of moderation and so they’ll ban you on a whim if they think you’re there to stir shit. They use the ban hammer judiciously even with users on their own instance. That’s often the biggest complaint both with hexbear and with lemmy.ml.

      • Lvxferre@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        12 days ago

        To be fair I’ve had a few bad experiences with Hexbears, but I think that most of them boil down to “unfunny guy interacting with unserious kids”. But since I’m often lurking there in my political account, I feel like my opinion about them is a bit less ungrounded than this whole “Hexbear bad! EDIT WOW THANKS FOR THE GOLD KIND STRANGER!” echo chamber.

        (I also have a few bones to pick with .ml [the people in charge, not the whole instance], but they don’t apply to LG or HB, it’s a matter of transparency.)

        • archomrade [he/him]@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          11 days ago

          Browsing their coms can be a pretty unique experience, especially if you go in with a preformed idea of what their communities are like. There’s a huge spread of interests and experiences, and sometimes you can be browsing a niche community and forget that these were the people posting BPB on lemmy.world threads a year ago.

          Knowing the academic writings and history they’re referencing helps a lot with understanding where they are coming from, even if you may not agree with all of it.

    • Pandantic [none/username]@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      13 days ago

      Thank you for saying this in a more detailed way than I have been. This is exactly right. They built their own leftist haven and became a whole culture of their own, and then became federated. There is bound to be an initial clash, but honestly I think most of the people who hate on them never gave them a chance. All they saw were the shitposts and the in-jokes and you closed the door.

      When it comes to dealing with HB users here, my advice is the exact same as dealing with other users

      • if you don’t like what someone is saying (because it’s idiotic, obstrusive, or whatever), block the person for some peace of mind.

      • if you’re consistently uninterested on the content coming from an instance, block the instance.

      I see a lot of leftists (and leaning leftists), even on .world, who would be better off interacting with the users there (maybe blocking the shitposting comms). And outside of those most-seen comms (chapotraphouse and dunk_tank), there is genuine conversation and less shit talking and in-jokes. I believe, with more instances coming in that are federated with them (mine, .ml, and lem.ee? are a couple), some of the Hex-natives are understanding how to interact with curious left-leaning people with unintentionally wrong-headed ideas.

      Downvote me all you want, I stand by Hexbear. o7

    • marcos@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      13 days ago

      antifa

      Yeah, the famous antifa-tankers. Every single person I’ve ever seen that identifies as antifa was a tanker. Other people run away from that label.

      • Lvxferre@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        13 days ago

        I really hate that I need to point this out, because I feel like it will derail the discussion from Hexbear to fascism:

        “Antifa” boils down to “people who actively oppose fascism”, instead of either supporting it or sitting on their hands while doing jack shit.

        • marcos@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          13 days ago

          Is there something in the name requiring people to support fascism if it wears the right color?

          • Lvxferre@mander.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            13 days ago

            Is there something in the name requiring people to support fascism if it wears the right color?

            Do some people fighting fascism (aka antifa) go overboard? Yes, certainly; that’s bound to happen with any movement, group, or cohort.

            For example, someone might miss the target due to witch hunting, or adopt an “ends always justify means” mindset, or even conflate “non-suporter = enemy”.

            However. By implying that “antifa is fascism wearing a different colour”, like you are doing, you’re showing to not understand the obvious difference between

            • individuals following an ideology grounded on xenophobia, nationalism, racism, militarism, censorship, suppression of your individuality by force, more often than not sexism, homophobia and transphobia; and
            • individuals who don’t want the shit above to transform their lives into living hells, including some willing to use force to fight back.

            This conflation between both groups is not just immoral. It’s worse - it stinks stupidity and similar filth from a distance. As such I’m not wasting my time further with you, go chew some grass.

        • JustEnoughDucks@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          12 days ago

          Maybe you can clear this up then:

          Why does everyone there unequivocally, wholeheartedly, unquestionably support Russia?

          Russia has barely a trace of communism anymore and it is hard right oligarchy that fits almost every definition of fascism. Not to mention HEAVILY racist and anti-LGBTQ (I have multiple friends who were from Russia and they were the ones who originally told me that before I saw it for myself in Russia)

          Yet the “antifa” hexbear will literally down vote you to hell and ban you if you say anything even slightly bad about Russia.

          Also news@hexbear is 80% articles about the war with everyone citing Russian propaganda as absolute truth and every western media, every human rights group, etc… is completely lying about the war.

          An interesting juxtaposition as they are in the same way pro Palestine and cite those human rights groups as telling the absolute truth in that case

          • Lvxferre@mander.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            11 days ago

            I don’t know for sure. I’ll voice a strong belief in this regard, but take it with a grain of salt.

            I think that Hexbear’s views on Russia is a specific case of a general tendency that you see all across social media (not just HB or Lemmy): to dichotomise complex matters into exactly one good side and exactly one bad side, while assuming that everyone belongs to those two bags. It should go like:

            1. NATO bad.
            2. NATO fights Russia.
            3. Criticism against Russia assumed to be NATO support.
            4. Since NATO bad, NATO supporter bad.
            5. Anyone who would otherwise criticise both NATO and Russia gets screeched at, and eventually shuts up.
            6. “Russia good” becomes part of a local consensus.

            It gets messier when you add Ukraine into the equation, or consider people conflating governments and populations, but it should give you an idea - it starts with somewhat sane premises but quickly devolves into insane lack of logic.

            It explains nicely why they’re supporting Palestine, even with the apparent contradiction: Israel is associated with USA and thus with NATO.

            IMO their dichotomy in this topic is idiotic. However it is not just from their part, and blaming specifically Hexbear for this, like some people would do, would be unjust (and a self-demonstrating example). We, people using the internet in the 20s, are collectively doing it.

            By the way, you see another example of the general phenomenon in this comment chain. Ctrl+F “elephant shit” and look at the comment I was replying to - “you either treat two types of bad as the same, or you’re defending one.”

            [Now I probably drew the ire of all sides at the same time. Frankly? I don’t give a fuck; I’m too old and grumpy to play along.]

      • HelixDab2@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        13 days ago

        Most antifa groups are anarchist collectives. So I’m not sure where you’re seeing this, unless it’s solely from people that are terminally online.