Normally, it really bothers me, but in this case I can understand that the explanation wouldn’t fit in the headline. “Rookie QB is the first to suck so bad he threw for more than 25 receptions for less than 100 yards and no TDs and his team still won” has a bit of a Knopian quality to it.
I normally do post the meat of the article in the body of the text, even when I post from my phone, but I was juggling some other tasks and half-assed it today, lol. Apologies + thanks to the Meat Bridge.
Thanks meat bridge! Fuck the click bait.
Normally, it really bothers me, but in this case I can understand that the explanation wouldn’t fit in the headline. “Rookie QB is the first to suck so bad he threw for more than 25 receptions for less than 100 yards and no TDs and his team still won” has a bit of a Knopian quality to it.
I normally do post the meat of the article in the body of the text, even when I post from my phone, but I was juggling some other tasks and half-assed it today, lol. Apologies + thanks to the Meat Bridge.
Didn’t mean to accuse you of generating the click bait. And to be fair to the source it made me want to click.
Thank you!