Former U.S. presidents are authorized a security detail from the Secret Service for life. If Trump loses the election and flees the country, does his security detail have to go with him if he requests it?

I imagine this could go down in a variety of ways: He departs the U.S. before he’s sentenced and just never returns, or he attempts to flees or does flees the U.S. after his sentencing. Either way, what happens to his security detail?

If he attempts to flees after he’s sentenced, I would hope the detail would refuse to take part in it (if he can even board a plane/leave the country to begin with), but given all their failings, who knows.

  • TheObviousSolution@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    9 hours ago

    But those lawsuits aren’t at the federal level, they are at the state level, or so I understand. The secret service operates at the federal level. And if they are at the federal level, well, the Supreme Court has been stuffed and they’ve been pretty flagrant at expanding GQP corruption mechanics.

  • Furbag@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    2 days ago

    USSS won’t just let him get on a plane and fly off to Russia. His security is their top priority, so allowing him to secrete himself somewhere without first verifying his itinerary and securing both the mode of transportation and the destination, would be unthinkable. That means they are reporting all of his movements to local law enforcement. Can’t exactly flee the country in secret when every cop in the state will know his exact position and have eyes on him at all times. If the courts think he is a flight risk, someone involved in the process will know what he’s trying to do and prevent him from going anywhere where it will be hard to get him back again.

    • rsuri@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      The former presidents act seems to imply that a former president can decline Secret Service protection and even get $1 million for doing so. So I imagine he could just decline protection and hire his own security. But that would make it pretty obvious that he’s planning on fleeing.

      • Furbag@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 day ago

        I suppose he could dismiss them, but considering he just had two recent attempts on his life, that would probably be unwise to say the least.

  • robolemmy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    136
    ·
    3 days ago

    AFAIK ex-presidents aren’t allowed to leave the country without specific permission, due to all the classified crap in their heads. If one tried to flee the country, it would be their detail’s duty to detain them.

    Heck, they’re not even allowed to drive in public roads… not that Trump has probably ever driven a car.

    • SkybreakerEngineer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      50
      ·
      2 days ago

      You could say the same about running off with boxes of classified docs and keeping them in a bathroom. Reality is they don’t care as long as he’s alive

    • 2pt_perversion@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      2 days ago

      No, most of this is untrue. Ex Presidents can refuse secret service detail. They are allowed to drive on public roads - that is a secret service rule that they can’t but it’s not against the law and Presidents don’t have to follow those rules. And they are allowed to live outside the US if a host country allows them.

    • barsquid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 days ago

      But why bother? He has already sold everything he knows along with the contents of the documents he stole.

  • riodoro1@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    2 days ago

    You are assuming he is going to be sentenced in the US which as we’ve all seen is impossible.

  • eran_morad@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    67
    ·
    2 days ago

    USSS is on this guy like flies on shit and you’d better believe he’s not going anywhere if he loses the election. TF do you think Harris is gonna do, just be like “yeah, that trump guy, fuck him, whatever.” Everyone knows that he’s a tremendous national security risk (which truly blows my mind - assholes are going to actively vote to sabotage their own country).

    • GraniteM@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      I’m just imagining being the poor sap working for a foreign power trying to extract useful information from his cottage cheese brain.

      “Do you have nuclear subs in the South China Sea?”

      “We have to be extremely vigilant and extremely careful when it comes to nuclear. Nuclear changes the whole ballgame. … The biggest problem we have is nuclear — nuclear proliferation and having some maniac, having some madman go out and get a nuclear weapon. That’s in my opinion, that is the single biggest problem that our country faces right now.”

      “Where! Are! The nuclear! Subs! Deployed!”

      “Look, having nuclear — my uncle was a great professor and scientist and engineer, Dr. John Trump at MIT; good genes, very good genes, OK, very smart, the Wharton School of Finance, very good, very smart — you know, if you’re a conservative Republican, if I were a liberal, if, like, OK, if I ran as a liberal Democrat, they would say I’m one of the smartest people anywhere in the world — it’s true! — but when you’re a conservative Republican they try — oh, do they do a number — that’s why I always start off: Went to Wharton, was a good student, went there, went there, did this, built a fortune — you know I have to give my like credentials all the time, because we’re a little disadvantaged — but you look at the nuclear deal, the thing that really bothers me — it would have been so easy, and it’s not as important as these lives are — nuclear is so powerful; my uncle explained that to me many, many years ago, the power and that was 35 years ago; he would explain the power of what’s going to happen and he was right, who would have thought? — but when you look at what’s going on with the four prisoners — now it used to be three, now it’s four — but when it was three and even now, I would have said it’s all in the messenger; fellas, and it is fellas because, you know, they don’t, they haven’t figured that the women are smarter right now than the men, so, you know, it’s gonna take them about another 150 years — but the Persians are great negotiators, the Iranians are great negotiators, so, and they, they just killed, they just killed us, this is horrible.”

    • Asafum@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      2 days ago

      which truly blows my mind - assholes are going to actively vote to sabotage their own country

      The problem is they don’t see it at all. Anyone who is truly in favor of Trump is watching propaganda that will always frame him as a poor victim of evil Democrat smear campaigns. Anyone else who is voting for him because they’re a Republican and they just always vote R is just not paying attention and also fall under the category of “not seeing it.” :(

    • Tinidril@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 days ago

      I’m not so sure he’s much of a security risk, unless he is still in possession of sensitive documents. I sincerely doubt he is capable of remembering anything in the way of valuable secrets. Anyways, even if he did, any adversary would be daft to trust he remembered correctly.

  • radix@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    86
    ·
    3 days ago

    Security is a privilege, not a mandate. Nixon dropped his in 1985.

    Becoming a fugitive from justice would count as voluntarily giving up lots of privileges, the very least of which would be a publicly funded security detail.

    • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      I imagine they would just arrest him and hand him over for protection. Any member who allowed it would be breaking their oath and supporting an enemy of the state at that point would they not?

      Edit: I meant prosecution, not protection, but apparently people understood

      • radix@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        2 days ago

        If we’re gaming the whole scenario out, I imagine it would go something like this.

        None of his current convictions are expected to come with a custodial sentence, but say he loses the election, and the more serious trials are heating up. At that point, he knows he’s toast. 2028 is too late to run a fourth time; he’s got no more hail marys, so he dismisses his detail completely, retreats to Florida, and sneaks away to Saudi Arabia in the middle of the night.

        He’s got a private jet, so getting out of the country shouldn’t be a huge problem. But I think you’re right that he has to set all this in motion before a guilty verdict is delivered. At that point, getting away from the secret service would be much more difficult.

        • Tinidril@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          2 days ago

          None of his current convictions are expected to come with a custodial sentence

          Strict adherence to sentencing guidelines actually would see him jailed on his current convictions. If he isn’t given some kind of imprisonment it will be because the judge was afraid of the aftermath.

          • Furbag@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            2 days ago

            The minimum sentence is a hefty fine, but the judge in that very trial already determined that fines do not discourage Trump’s behavior, given the contempt punishment that he ignored, so I don’t think it’s going to be a slap on the wrist for him unless the judge truly is a hypocrite or a coward.

            That being said, even if he gets prison for each of his felony counts, he can serve them all concurrently, a maximum of 3 years per count. So he could theoretically be out of prison right before the next election cycle with a year left to campaign for 2028, that is assuming he truly is sentenced immediately after the election in November and it’s not just pushed back indefinitely due to recount horseshit or Trump crazies doing another insurrection.

            But there are other trials that are far more likely to result in additional prison time, the most important two being the classified documents case and the Jan 6th case. I have faith that the justice system will eventually follow through with punishing Trump, but the system is set up to slow-walk the rich and powerful to accountability.

            • Tinidril@midwest.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 day ago

              That’s an accurate summation for my understanding as well. Things that the judge should look at when considering a minimum sentence are defendant cooperation, displays of genuine remourse, and indications that the defendant is unlikely to continue breaking the law. If the judge can find any of that, it’s beyond me how.

            • MutilationWave@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 day ago

              I don’t think he’s got four years left in him. I wouldn’t be surprised if it gets slow-walked so hard that he dies before getting sent to prison.

        • Maggoty@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          he has to set all this in motion before a guilty verdict is delivered.

          Well that ship sailed.

  • Maggoty@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    2 days ago

    Yes, but extradition back when the court issues a bench warrant would also be extremely easy. If there’s already an order keeping him from traveling they’d have to enforce it. Which is part of why that New York judge getting scared was bad, the system is poorly designed for rich defendants. Usually it handles it by getting their passport and restricting them from traveling.

  • Bytemeister@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    2 days ago

    The whole point of the USSS protecting former Presidents is to prevent this exact thing from happening. The USSS would do everything in their power to prevent him from fleeing or to get him back.

    • Maggoty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 days ago

      No. Just no. It’s to prevent someone from un-aliving them for stuff they did as President.

        • ZeffSyde@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          2 days ago

          I imagine anyone trying to extract intelligence from that weird guy would end up less informed than before.

          • Blumpkinhead@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 day ago

            “Yes comrade, that’s right. He’s telling us that the country is ovverrun with woke transexual alien criminals that are eating all of the household pets. Yes…yes I tried asking for the nuclear codes, but he just started rampbling about a radical lesbian liberal agenda and now he’s talking about China and hamberders. Comrade, he won’t stop talking about Nancy Pelosi and Obama and now I think he’s trying to sell me his ugly golden sneakers…”

  • Death_Equity@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    3 days ago

    The USSS would not have any obligation to a former president that is a fugitive from law.

    As individuals they could abandon their service, which has serious legal remifications, and follow Trump of their own choice. I doubt any would do that because why they became USSS and how badly it would ruin their lives.

    • grasshopper_mouse@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      So I looked into the USSS, and here from their FAQ: "Under Title 18, Section 3056, of the United States Code, agents and officers of the United States Secret Service can:

      Carry firearms

      Execute warrants issued under the laws of the United States

      Make arrests without warrants for any offense against the United States committed in their presence, or for any felony recognizable under the laws of the United States if they have reasonable grounds to believe that the person to be arrested has committed such felony

      Offer and pay rewards for services and information leading to the apprehension of persons involved in the violation of the law that the Secret Service is authorized to enforce

      Investigate fraud in connection with identification documents, fraudulent commerce, fictitious instruments and foreign securities and

      Perform other functions and duties authorized by law"

      This leads me to wonder just how many times a SS Agent witnessed Trump committing a felony in their presence but didn’t arrest him.

      • Death_Equity@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        2 days ago

        They have no obligation to enforce the law, just as a patrol cop does not need to pull you over for speeding. There also is having to be the guy that arrests Trump and the response that would bring you.

      • dylanmorgan@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        2 days ago

        More to the point, if there is a warrant issued for his arrest, his secret service detail would need to arrest him.

            • fodderoh@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              2 days ago

              The protection detail would not arrest him. The agency with the warrant would coordinate with the secret service to either get access to Trump or, more likely, give Trump the opportunity to surrender.

      • Maggoty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        There’s a massive difference between watching someone commit arson and watching a document get delivered that turns everything into a RICO case. You’d never know unless you knew the business details.

      • Death_Equity@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 days ago

        He is more of a fan of his wife dying and hiding things in the coffin.

        Melania falls down the stairs and he has her casket sent to her homeland of Slovenia or burial, which is quite the convenient place for him to find himself.

  • AshMan85@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    3 days ago

    Secret service takes their orders from the current president. So, if the order were given to bring him in they would have too.

  • spicylemon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 days ago

    Probably for the best. Two assassination attempts in less than four months is pathetic to say the least. Even though his actions led to this🤷‍♀️🤭

  • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 days ago

    Interesting question that hadn’t occurred to me. Great one to bring up as a thought experiment. I agree with a sibling comment that says he likely wouldn’t be covered if convicted, but this is also new (and previously unthinkable) territory.

    • Letstakealook@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 days ago

      It isn’t previously unthinkable, they just previously chose not to think about it. Reagan and Nixon are recent criminal presidents that were both spared prosecution and given full honors as former presidents.

      • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        Even those of us who wanted Bush Jr to stand trial for war crimes never thought it was possible. This is the first time it’s been a possibility for sure. That’s how far this asshole has run amuck.

        • Letstakealook@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          I was strictly speaking violations of US law, not international law. That list is much more extensive.