• JaggedRobotPubes@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    48
    ·
    3 days ago

    That’s what enshittification is. Make something good, draw people in, they make your service a part of their lives, and then you fuck them in the ass.

    The best situation is giving money to a company that’s not shitty. The second best situation is piracy. The third best situation is letting yourself get fucked over. It’s really up to the companies whether or not we have the best situation. It’s up to all of us to have the basic dignity to not get screwed over by the worst option, and to choose the second one when they try.

  • Sundial@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    54
    ·
    3 days ago

    Because they can. The objective of any company is to squeeze as much profit as they can. It’s more lucrative to offer tiered services where you have to pay extra for no advertisements so they do it. If they realize enough people are leaving because of it they will reverse it.

  • jafffacakelemmy@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    3 days ago

    if you are paying for any streaming service that has advert breaks, you are the reason there are commercials. imagine if subscribers walked away when they were introduced!

  • clickyello@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    look up a guide on how to set up stremio with torrentio and realdebrid. takes all of 15-30 minutes to set up and $15 for 6 months of being able to stream practically anything all in one place. ad free

    (I know not an answer but I figured an actual solution to the problem was preferable to a 20th person explaining enshittification lol)

    eta the important part

    • Don_Dickle@lemmy.worldOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 days ago

      Thats nice sweetie but probably been pirating before you were born…no offense. My only sub is Netflix. I just thought maybe like a 15 second commercial or something like youtube videos. But was watching KAOS and it was a freaking ads that lasted over 3 minutes.

      • clickyello@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        3 days ago

        this is a fully integrated frontend that looks like a proper streaming app using a debrid service to provide the content, it’s a wooooorld of difference.

        much much much more convenient and less AP than traditional pirating.

        • fishpen0@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          3 days ago

          I dunno. I got a plex lifetime pass 13 years ago in college and setup Usenet with sab, sickbeard and couch potato. Aside from moving to sonarr, radarr 8 or so years ago I’ve never needed to think about it. Currently sitting at 36TB of content. Maybe I’ll move to jellyfin but ¯\(ツ)

          Before that I was on DC++ and IRC and honestly haven’t needed torrents in my stack since I was in middle school back in the early aughts

          • clickyello@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            I mean yeah if you enjoy the homelab project aspect of it that’s great, personally I was looking into setting up a similar stack when I stumbled across a reddit post of someone who had a similarly huge library that was collecting dust because they just used stremio all the time instead.

            that post is actually how I first heard about stremio lol

  • _bcron_@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    3 days ago

    If the loss in revenue from turned-off consumers unsubscribing is less than the revenue gain from ads from people who just live with it, then it’s good for the business. That’s the world we live in now

  • BaldManGoomba@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    3 days ago

    Most people don’t get streaming content because commercials most people got it because that is where they content is and you can choose. When you want it.

    Streaming services didn’t make money when money was cheap to loan. Now money is expensive to get. Company needs to make profit rather than constantly taking in funding . Commercials make money. It kept tv and radio afloat. Streaming is still better than tv

  • forrgott@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    You actually have the answer in front of you.

    Yes, people signed up for stabbing(streaming) services, with their monthly fees, to get away from ads. So, the corporations start putting ads in the low tier, meaning you have to pay even more every month to start free from ads.

    Didn’t forget: “good” for the business is “bad” for you. That’s pretty much baked into the very foundations of capitalism.

    • iii@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      I go to bakery and buy bread. They have more money, i have more bread.

      Good for bakery, good for me. I don’t understand what’s “bad” for me?

      • XTL@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        When they make the bread worse and raise prices to increase their profit margin. And show some ads to make extra profit. And start to pester you with more service tiers and subscriptions before they give you the bread because they’ll be able to scam some people into giving them another revenue stream…

        • iii@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 days ago

          So I have to imagine the bad part? Those things haven’t happened.

  • Pirky@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    3 days ago

    The line always has to go up. If the company stops picking up new subscribers, then their profits stagnate. And that makes investors unhappy. So to avoid that, they start to jack up the price to keep the line going up. And if that isn’t enough, they then start throwing ads into the services.
    The line must always go up.

  • snooggums@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    3 days ago

    The people that moved to streaming to get away from commercials switched a long time ago. Others watched the streaming sotes that had commercials because it was free or aignificsntly cheaper than cable.

    Of course being greedy companies means they want both the subscriptions and the ad revenue.

  • gaiussabinus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    3 days ago

    Because it worked with cable tv back in the day so it will work again if its allowed to. Stop giving companies your money as a general rule.

    • AA5B@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      Do you know what else eventually happened with cable? People cutting it by the millions when there was finally another choice.

      It’s interesting that my family went from wasting time siting in front of a big screen tv paying massively for cable channels we never used, to cutting the cable and only paying for 2-3 streaming services at a time

      But it’s even more interesting we continued down this path so our down time is dominated by small screens and somewhat interactive media instead of passively watching. If I stop paying for streaming media, my teens wouldn’t notice. It would just be the people here who would notice, as I complain more about doom scrolling and reaching the end

  • BearOfaTime@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    3 days ago

    Like pretty much anything, it’s because most people continue to pay for it despite the shittiness.

    Same reason concert tickets cost so much.