New research reveals serious privacy flaws in the data practices of new internet connected cars in Australia. It’s yet another reason why we need urgent reform of privacy laws.

Modern cars are increasingly equipped with internet-enabled features. Your “connected car” might automatically detect an accident and call emergency services, or send a notification if a child is left in the back seat.

But connected cars are also sophisticated surveillance devices. The data they collect can create a highly revealing picture of each driver. If this data is misused, it can result in privacy and security threats.

A report published today analysed the privacy terms from 15 of the most popular new car brands that sell connected cars in Australia.

This analysis uncovered concerning practices. There are enormous obstacles for consumers who want to find and understand the privacy terms. Some brands also make inaccurate claims that certain information is not “personal information”, implying the Privacy Act doesn’t apply to that data.

Some companies are also repurposing personal information for “marketing” or “research”, and sharing data with third parties.

    • modus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 hours ago

      In general, don’t allow it to connect to wifi. As for specific makes/models that might have their own uplink, look into disconnecting antennas.

        • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          19 hours ago

          Yup. Police do that, and I’m guessing it wouldn’t be too hard if you’re persistent (claim to be a private investigator or something).

          • unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            18 hours ago

            Found it (In german but we have translators these days…) https://netzpolitik.org/2024/databroker-files-firma-verschleudert-36-milliarden-standorte-von-menschen-in-deutschland/

            This is about phone location data, but i dont see any reason why cars would be any different, they create less privacy sensitive data than phones in a way.

            The people that wrote this article actually got a huge amount of slightly older data for free just as a sample. But this is the scale these data brokers operate at:

            The data itself comes from the US company Datastream Group. It offers such location data on a monthly subscription basis. According to the offer, it comes from up to 163 countries and is updated hourly.

            You can buy huge amounts of location data for anyone anywhere that uses a standard google or apple phone. Im not sure if you even need to have some random app, like socials or anything with ads in it, installed that leaks this data or if its just google and apple themselves that sell it. All you need is a single identifying point of confirmed time+location for your target and then you can reconstruct their entire movement from that.

            This has very obvious and less obvious horrible implications. Things like tracking victims of abuse, finding out peoples home address after meeting them once, tracking military personnel movement, tracking people going to sex related locations, prisons, abortion clinics, endless potential for abuse.

            • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              18 hours ago

              Awesome!

              The difference, though, is I can turn off my phone if I want to, but I can’t really turn off the car tracking unless I tear apart the car to remove the antenna (or at least the power). Some cars make it easy in the fuse box, but others make it a PIA.

              I’m planning to switch to a VOIP number and only use my SIM for data and SMS 2FA. Then I can turn off/remove the SIM as needed. Once I don’t need SMS anymore, I can get a data only SIM and hopefully hide among the various iPads and smart watches.

              I wish I could trust my carrier, but articles like the one you mentioned remind me that I really can’t.

  • lunarul@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    60
    ·
    2 days ago

    My cars are not modern enough for that, but I always carry a surveillance device in my pocket to make up for it.

    • sramder@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      You gotta love that there are benchmark for that… The company that can’t even get free, right.

      I really like their Amazon reviews thing that they bought… I bet the shady dude that had all the fucking people finder sites was in charge of that cause it’s got the same kind of fucking cheesy-graphic-load-screen… basically, the only functional piece of software they had at that point cause they hadn’t touched it, and then they went an AIed it up…

      Here’s a new idea, why doesn’t everybody in the fediverse post their favorite privacy enhanced Firefox rebrand:

      • QuadratureSurfer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        23
        ·
        2 days ago

        I’m really confused by your comment and it seems like you’re assuming everyone knows what you’re talking about already. Could you provide some context?

        What about “Free” are they getting wrong? (I’m assuming you’re talking about Mozilla here?).

        What Amazon reviews thing? Who was this “shady dude”, what did he do that was so “shady”, and how does that relate to Some Amazon review thing if you’re not even sure that he was behind it to begin with?

        What does “Aled it up” mean?

        • sramder@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 day ago

          Sorry… busy day and I’m going to need a real computer for this 😅

          RE Free… nothing really, just being bitter. I’m not a huge fan of a lot of the little tie-ins like Pocket, but I respect the hustle… if not the business plan.

          The Amazon review thing they bought is Fakespot™, check it out if you shop on Amazon. Here the Ai nonsense is just some summaries of the reviews it digested… not inherently bad, but the whole experience is painfully slow. Still. Well worth checking out if you haven’t.

          Shady dude gets a 📌 for now. Sorry. Time.

          If you check out Fakespot you can’t miss it. Have yet to try the browser integration, although I have enabled it for some reason…  

        • sensiblepuffin@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          2 days ago

          The Amazon reviews thing I assume is referring to Fakespot, which Mozilla bought some time ago.

          But I’m confused about their “AI’ed it up” comment because from the very beginning Fakespot was using ML to determine the tone of reviews and whether or not they were lying about the product/paid reviews by the seller.

          • sramder@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            Just griping a bit about what’s probably more of a design/branding change than anything.

            I think fakespot is promising tech that we desperately need more of.

            Can’t hurt to have it in their hands, hope to see more server resources ;-)

  • spyd3r@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    22 hours ago

    My next vehicle is going to be fully mechanical with a carburetor and no computerized bullshit.

    • PalmTreeIsBestTree@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      21 hours ago

      Just get an early OBD 2 car with no internet access and you are good or get an EFI kit for an old car as well. Carbs suck.

      • GreenKnight23@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        19 hours ago

        a well tuned carb will outperform an EFI system

        for about two hours. 🤣

        EFI is dynamic and adjusts the system as needed. However, a carb can be fixed with almost anything. I have a feeling that some of the older parts for EFI vehicles will be bought by major manufacturers and trashed/over priced to improve new vehicle sales and long term data collection goals. almost exactly how GM parts are today.

  • yeehaw@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    Modern cars have been privacy invading for a while. Goes back to the ownership torch thing again. Tesla can disable your car if they want. Why pay so much up front if you’re not in control? Old vehicles are the way to go.

    How would you even know about any of this stuff? I am not fortunate enough to afford a new vehicle but I imagine when you’re at the dealer they’re not like “so these cameras will watch you all the time… For safety and security, of course…”