I’m missing something here. Admittedly, I’m making the assumption that blowing up hospitals is a bad thing to do.

  • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    67
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    3 months ago

    There’s two answers that are both legitimate.

    The first is that we don’t have any sort of defensive weapons between Israel and Gaza. To intercept missiles/bombs/whatever

    Stuff like the Phalanx and RIM-116 at sea; or C-RAM (technically it’s the “land based phalanx system”…. But there are some critical difference in radar and the munitions it uses.

    The second answer is that the US navy hasn’t been ordered to. They haven’t been ordered to because their civilian leadership is 100% okay with Israel bombing the fuck out of Gaza. Yes, that includes Biden.

  • OutsizedWalrus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    48
    ·
    3 months ago

    Well, for one, the Iranian attack was a missile attack that could be taken down by anti air missile.

    Two, USA isn’t exactly irans ally

    • MyPornViewingAccount@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      34
      ·
      3 months ago

      You get hours to plot trajectories and line up a shot on an incoming missile or drone from those rsnges.

      For a bomb dropped from an aircraft theres 15 - 30 seconds from release to impact.

  • morphballganon@lemmy.world
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    3 months ago

    Alliances like NATO or the EU come with non-aggression stipulations. You can’t engage in warfare with an ally. If that ally happens to be bombing their own people, that would only allow for intervention if it was written into the accords signed by the nations in the alliance (hint: it’s not).

    Now, if Israel started bombing Italy, for example, that would not only allow for an intervention; it would require one.

    • vind@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      3 months ago

      There are no more hospitals in Gaza (because Israel destroyed every single one). And they have yet to show any evidence of Hamas using the hospitals as military bases.

      • PhlubbaDubba@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        It might have actually encouraged the use of hospital resources for millitary aims, because now that the hospitals can’t use them, it’s come out that Hamas is moving the hostages in commandeered ambulances.

        Israel literally incentivized and made more possible the war crime they claimed they were trying to punish Hamas for committing in the first place.

  • mannycalavera@feddit.uk
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    3 months ago

    Oh ho ho, you innocent child you. Sit down and allow me to tell you a story. It starts many decades ago and involves a Prince, some angry free thinkers, JFK, Anna Nicole Smith, and a smaaaaall aubergine 🍆.

  • CerealKiller01@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    17
    ·
    3 months ago

    The wrong assumption you’re making is that Israel is blowing up hospitals.

    You’re probably thinking about the blast in Al-Ahli Hospital in October, that was ruled by both the US and most news agencies as a failed Islamic Jihad launch.