Google warns users of these apps that their experience may deteriorate soon. They may “experience buffering issues” or see errors such as “the following content is not available on this app” when trying to watch videos.

Similar to Google Search, ads have become insufferable for many users of the service. There are too many of them, they may break the viewing experience, and they may show inappropriate content.

YouTube Premium is expensive. What weights more for some users is that its functionality is severely limited when compared to third-party apps.

The cat and mouse game continues.

For those looking to avoid ads or improve privacy, here are some options for free, open source, privacy-friendly frontends to YouTube without advertisements:

https://www.privacyguides.org/en/frontends/#youtube

  • TheFeatureCreature@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    50
    ·
    3 months ago

    You know, they’d probably get a tenfold increase of Premium subscribers if they just, I don’t know, dropped the prices a smidge and had better regional pricing. Not everyone can or will subscribe, but Google is only making this more difficult for themselves by making it such an expensive service.

    • Stovetop@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      3 months ago

      I was a happy subscriber when I was paying $15/mo for a family plan for 6 people. I was grandfathered into a low rate for being an early adopter of Google Play Music All Access.

      Then they decided that grandfathered plans no longer applied and wanted me to start paying $23/mo, a more than 50% increase, so I canceled. I switched to Spotify for the music, where I pay less, and just watch less YouTube since the ads are ridiculous.

      If they kept it at $15/mo, I’d still be a subscriber. If they sold just ad-free YouTube for like $3/mo, I’d consider subscribing to that and keeping my Spotify subscription.

      • Meltrax@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        23
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        It costs $23/mo for fucking YouTube? And to get the same experience you get with a free browser add-on? Fuck all of that. Absolutely not.

        • Stovetop@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          3 months ago

          Yep. Their excuse is that you also get YouTube music out of it, but there is no option to buy them separately.

          At this point I have no interest in moving away from Spotify, so Google’s gonna have to play ball if they want to get me back. It’s sad, too, when it seems like every other YouTube link I visit from my phone brings up a prompt begging me to subscribe again.

          • Frost-752@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            Right, cause YouTube/Google are really struggling so much that their only option is to increase prices while offering less value and making everyone’s experience worse. Maybe, and hear me out here, the massive billion dollar corporation could make less money.

              • Frost-752@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                edit-2
                3 months ago

                As far as I know, YouTube does not lose money(feel free to correct this with a source) and even just from a logical perspective if YouTube loses google money why keep pouring so many resources into it? The correct answer imo is YouTube doesn’t lose money theyre just greedy pigs but Alphabet(the parent company behind both google and YouTube) makes 10s of billions of dollars in profit, they are not struggling to pay the bills hell even if YouTube was losing then money fucking good they shouldn’t be allowed to hoard that much wealth anyway, but feel free to keep being a corporate bootlicker.

          • GardenVarietyAnxiety@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            3 months ago

            It reads to me like you think these companies are entitled to a user base. They aren’t. Just because it costs money to run a service, it does not mean we have to accept the price they charge or the anti consumer practices.

          • Meltrax@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            3 months ago

            The Internet is actually free. Services on it aren’t always. The issue with YouTube monetizing, for me, is 1) they are doing it retroactively and 2) they’re monetizing content made by others.

    • cybersandwich@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      3 months ago

      I was about to pay for it when they doubled the cost. No joke I told my wife I was going to start paying since we watch it all the time. The next week they doubled the cost. It irritated me. Not because I couldn’t afford it but because they added no value with the increase. Nothing changed.

    • ElmerFudd@lemmy.world
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 months ago

      I believe there’s a sort of death-loop phenom taking place here. The enshitification, you know.

  • _sideffect@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    3 months ago

    It’s ok google, we have just as many engineers across the world that hate you and your ads and want to watch videos without your predatory pricing.

    • Plopp@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 months ago

      Indeed. However, they have that web DRM thing in their back pocket. The more we resist (as we should) their efforts to shut ad circumvention down, the more they’ll look at web DRM I’m sure. And they’ll have all large media outlets with them when they load that ball into the cannon.

  • shortwavesurfer@monero.town
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    3 months ago

    Go ahead, as the only Google service I regularly interact with, I am looking for a reason to finally ditch it, so that I can say that I no longer use any Google services at all for any reason.

  • madcaesar@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    3 months ago

    Even if my client couldn’t block ads, I’d still keep it for the downvote button count and sponsor block.

    Fuck Google and their price gouging.

  • Xero@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    3 months ago

    Google lost the battle even in their own browser so now they’re trying to save face by attacking third party apps, dumbass just don’t know how to take the L.

  • Daiken@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    3 months ago

    I uninstalled the YouTube app on my phone a long time ago. I only visit the site in an ad blocking browser.

    • Hadriscus@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Had no idea you could do that. I just went and did it, thanks for the tip. I use Newpipe anyway

  • jaschen@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    3 months ago

    Does anyone know how to add my subscriptions and channels from regular YouTube to newpipe? There isn’t a login feature.

    • Nickert239@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 months ago

      You have to export your youtube data at “google takeout manager” and import it in new pipe. Also you can read about it at newpipe FAQs