minus-squareairrowOPlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·3 months ago half of my party voted against aiding Ukraine Yes, that is our half, the conservatives you want to suddenly espouse this? We have been espousing this consistently since (and against) Iraq, it is the policy of non-interventionism. The neo-“conservatives” are the ones who want the aggressive wars and to be “world police”
minus-squaremojofrododojo@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·3 months agoAh like the isolationists in 1940, yeah, that’s a great look. yeah, somehow you’re even worse.
minus-squareairrowOPlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·3 months agoI don’t think warmongering is a better look, or that WW2 couldn’t have been resolved contrary to non-interventionist policy, as it was the dominant U.S. policy up until that time: https://infogalactic.com/info/United_States_non-interventionism
minus-squareawwwyissss@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·3 months agoSupporting Ukrainian freedom to prevent Europe spiraling into WW3 isn’t war mongering.
minus-squareairrowOPlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·3 months agoDo you think possibly waging war by the U.S. being involved with Ukraine would make WW3 more likely? That’s what a lot of people think contrarily
minus-squareawwwyissss@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·3 months agoI think it makes it less likely. If the Kremlin is stopped in Ukraine it makes it unlikely they’ll continue their aggression. The comparison many people make to Czechoslovakia in 1939 is appropriate.
minus-squaremojofrododojo@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·3 months agoI think you are a pogue who’s willing to sell women and children to Putin if it makes your life a tiny bit simpler. Despicable.
Yes, that is our half, the conservatives
We have been espousing this consistently since (and against) Iraq, it is the policy of non-interventionism. The neo-“conservatives” are the ones who want the aggressive wars and to be “world police”
Ah like the isolationists in 1940, yeah, that’s a great look.
yeah, somehow you’re even worse.
I don’t think warmongering is a better look, or that WW2 couldn’t have been resolved contrary to non-interventionist policy, as it was the dominant U.S. policy up until that time: https://infogalactic.com/info/United_States_non-interventionism
Supporting Ukrainian freedom to prevent Europe spiraling into WW3 isn’t war mongering.
Do you think possibly waging war by the U.S. being involved with Ukraine would make WW3 more likely? That’s what a lot of people think contrarily
I think it makes it less likely. If the Kremlin is stopped in Ukraine it makes it unlikely they’ll continue their aggression.
The comparison many people make to Czechoslovakia in 1939 is appropriate.
I think you are a pogue who’s willing to sell women and children to Putin if it makes your life a tiny bit simpler.
Despicable.