• protist@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    9 days ago

    I work alongside police occasionally, and they really don’t care about enforcing weed laws at all. The ones I’ve spoken to about it say the only time they charge people for possession is as an add-on charge when they’ve been arrested for something more serious. This is going to vary widely by police department, though

      • PM_Your_Nudes_Please@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        8 days ago

        Never understood why this was so accepted.

        Two big reasons. First, maybe they want to get the person off the streets for some reason. Maybe they’re violent. But getting individual charges to stick can be difficult, so they just throw everything they can at the person to hopefully get them for something.

        Second, it’s something they can use in plea bargaining. To use the above violent offender example, maybe someone is charged with battery and weed possession. The battery charge is hard to prove, but the weed possession is ironclad. The plea deal removes the (easy to prove) weed charge, but keeps the (hard to prove) battery charge. Now they didn’t need to bother with actually proving it, because the plea has them admitting to it. Without that weed charge, their only bargaining chip would be to reduce the violent charge to something lesser.

        Whether or not it’s okay is really up to individual interpretation. But those are at least the two big arguments for why it became common.

  • YamahaRevstar@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    9 days ago

    I’m a law enforcement officer. I use marijuana to criminalize otherwise innocent and nonviolent minorities so that I can shoot them without consequences.

    Pew Pew!

    Nah JK I’m not a piggy.

  • Caboose12000@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    9 days ago

    my sister dated a cop from a cop family a couple years ago. she said even long after weed had long been legalized in our state he still had a lot of harmful assumptions he’d make about someone if they smoked weed, along the lines of them just stright up being bad and immoral people, comparing them to more serious and/or violent criminals and vaugly dehumanizing them along with everyone else he saw as a law-breaker.

    ultimately as far as I heard he didnt let these judgments significantly impact his work though, never heard a word of him doing anything more corrupt than driving a bit wrecklessly when bored on patrol. I mean I’m sure they did have an impact, but I mean to say he didnt do anything cartoonishly evil about it as long as he and my sister stayed dating.

    • PM_Your_Nudes_Please@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      9 days ago

      Alternatively, my friend (the biggest stoner I know) married a cop. Our state never officially decriminalized it. His stance has basically been “as long as I don’t see it, we have plausible deniability and I don’t need to do anything about it.”

      • Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        8 days ago

        Before it became decriminalized in MA in a lot of places the worst that would happen is what stoners would call “the bowl tax”.

        The cops would smash your glass. Basically to send a message that your being dumb smoking in an openly public space and making them waste their time on you.

  • orcrist@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    9 days ago

    My dude, cops never gave a damn about pot. It was always a pretextual reason to screw with people.

    • Rogue@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      9 days ago

      That’s basically what OP said isn’t it?

      You see a white dude smoking a joint so you wink at them and move on.

      You see a black dude in a car so you put your hand on your holster, immediately your training tells you that you should sense the smell of weed, you approach aggressively make multiple conflicting demands in rapid succession, draw your weapon etc etc.

      Later that day you see a white dude smoking a joint so you wink at them and move on.

      • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 days ago

        It’s like they’re reciting a script when they talk about “your eyes are glassy and red” during DUI stops in bodycam videos on YouTube. Because they are reciting a script.

        Kinda like the sheriff that pulled me over for unknown reasons who smelled pot in my car (literally never articulated a reason, though context clues suggest they were investigating a stolen and abandoned vehicle). I was borrowing my dad’s vehicle while mine was in the shop. No pot ever entered that car.

        But he definitely smelled it. /s

  • otto@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    9 days ago

    I’d be very surprised if there were many cops here who would out themselves just to answer your question.

    If I were to speculate, however, I imagine that they don’t really care that much. Cops have other things to worry about, too, including a wide range of other drugs they can plant on “troublesome” suspects.

  • happydoors@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    8 days ago

    Son of a cop here: I don’t think moral, normal people police officers care a ton about the small possession charges unless it involves DUI or domestic violence of some sort. Catching truckloads of the stuff driving through the small town was a big deal sometimes. I hope/think that hasn’t changed much despite laws going back and forth. Now, to dickhead power hungry hometown heroes that join the force because they got chubby and became skill-less after highschool football, they probably have never changed their stance and will still find ways to tack on charges of public impairment

      • happydoors@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        8 days ago

        Yeah, it’s awful. I love THC and criminalization is historically racist suppression. I am not in support of the bad people, just trying to help answer the question! Also important to note that police do not carry out sentences, that’s the court and judges.

      • MothmanDelorian@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        8 days ago

        I faced a year in jail over .05 grams and a one hitter back in the 1990s. Im white so I was fine but the latino kid who walked past me that day smoking a joint got time.

    • orcrist@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      9 days ago

      Cops don’t have a duty to protect you. Sorry, but you better build your own safety net, cuz the pigs will do whatever they feel like doing.