I have friends who are Afghan who have had arranged marriages so this led me to be curious to ask, why does this practice still persist into the 21st century?

  • aleph@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    53
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    It’s probably worth mentioning that an “arranged marriage” can mean anything from when two families agree to marry off their children without their children’s consent, to when families play match-maker and set their children up on dates but their children get the final say.

    In India, for example, you get both, with the former being more common in conservative, rural areas and the latter more common in urban and middle-class areas. So it’s not a one-size-fits-all situation.

    As to why it persists? Practicality, I suppose. If you want to get married, it helps if you filter out all the people who aren’t serious about settling down. Plus it’s not like love marriages have a superb success rate, given how common divorce is nowadays.

    • PhlubbaDubba@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      32
      ·
      2 months ago

      In fairness divorce rates are high because of young people getting divorced because they realized they shouldn’t have gotten married while they were still growing out of their early adulthood.

      The only reason arranged marriage societies seem to have a higher success rate is because divorce is rare since who someone gets married to is often determined by family standing and the party who wants a divorce is often browbeaten into compliance to not jeopardize the benefit of that marriage tie.

      Were divorce not so stigmatized that you yourself literally cited it as a failure metric of love marriages, arranged marriage societies would likely see even higher divorce rates than love match societies, as love match societies will exhibit low to moderate social pressure to seek marriage, while arranged match societies can feature families shopping suitors as soon as the kid hits legal age of consent, and maybe even before then if they’re especially sprung on controlling their kids’ life.

      US divorce rates would be cut down by requiring a prenup to get a marriage license. Arranged marriage societies would see marriages and families implode across the land if abused spouses ever felt reasonably safe that they could divorce without being ruined for it either by their family, the courts, or the vigilante lynch mob their STBX calls up in retaliation for them trying to escape.

      • eskimofry@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 months ago

        I feel like your view of arranged marriage is limited to the US and hence poisoned by Shitty US Laws.

        • Tyfud@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          2 months ago

          Ah, ok, so it’s a lot better in India and Pakistan then?

          Please explain how. I’m serious. And curious.

  • answersplease77@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    2 months ago

    in many cultures it’s tradition like India, while in others it’s a nessicity because it’s illegal to look at, befriend or chat with any female

      • ribhu@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        What they mean is that there is a deep rooted segregation of men and women. Especially in rural parts of India, where you can get to your mid-20s without interacting with a person from the opposite sex (not from your family i.e.). There are no social settings where you can “meet people” and hence for marriage, arranged is the only way.

      • Hucklebee@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        2 months ago

        Not if your culture doesn’t value tradition. Yet there are cultures where tradition is ingrained in it’s value systems.

  • MrsDoyle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    2 months ago

    I know a young man who headed back to India for an arranged marriage. I expressed my extreme surprise that he would agree to marry someone he’d never met, and he said he trusted his parents to choose someone compatible. “After all, they know me better than anyone else.” I remain baffled, honestly. He seems an otherwise savvy, modern person. But there you go, happy to commit to a stranger.

    I dread to think what kind of bloke my parents would have picked for me…

  • gedaliyah@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    2 months ago

    Others have already talked about the potential benefits of matchmaking, but not a lot of people have talked about marriage as a joining of families. There are lots of cultures where it’s normative to live together with parents and grandparents (which if you think about it also means aunts and uncles, cousins, etc.). There are lots of benefits to people who live this way - greater financial stability, access to childcare, healthcare, increased lifespan, lower depression - and so it makes sense. If you are bringing someone new into the household, it may be important for the heads of the household to weigh on or even choose the person or the family.

  • iceonfire1@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    2 months ago

    For some of my friends in the US, finding a nice person to date is difficult. An arranged marriage means 1.) they are recommended to a suitor and more likely to be taken seriously, 2) the suitor is recommended to them, so they are less likely to be a waste of time, and 3) someone else is also at least a little invested in the relationship. Given the above, and that the actual people involved still have to consent for the relationship to progress, an arranged marriage actually makes a lot of sense.

    It’s kind of like a dating app (which also recommends a match), but if the algorithm was human and actually worked to your benefit instead of to make money.

  • fine_sandy_bottom@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    2 months ago

    Sheesh. There’s a lot of weird ideas in this thread.

    I made a lot of mistakes in my teens and 20s, including but not limited to my poor choices in romantic partners.

    If it was culturally appropriate, it would’ve been great to have some help.

  • NeptuneOrbit@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    2 months ago

    I can think of a lot of reasons. In a rural area, finding a suitable partner is tough. Why not let a web of adults help out.

  • MrJameGumb@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    2 months ago

    Because there are still places in the world where men think they’re entitled to basically own another human being simply by virtue of having been born with a penis?

    • eskimofry@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 months ago

      You’re deliberately saying that’s the only reason and blaming that “men” only want a sex slave. Hence the downvotes.

      You should get your head out of the gutter.

    • MrJameGumb@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 months ago

      Wow, look at those downvotes! I guess a lot of you guys think you’re entitled to a wife wether she wants it or not lol

      You guys do realize that an “arranged marriage” is not a matchmaking service, you just get stuck with someone you may possibly literally hate for the rest of your life lol

      • eskimofry@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        2 months ago

        You’re simply wrong. Arranged marriage is not a strict definition of no consent. In fact, a lot of the time the girl has the final say in going ahead after an initial exchange of photos and talking face to face, at least that’s how it works in cities and urbanized areas.

        The reason you have this myopic view is that you’re misled into believing that arranged marriage is forced marriage by watching horror stories on the news. We all know the News cherrypicks for shock factor.

        • MrJameGumb@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          2 months ago

          I have this view because the state I live in is still backwards enough that arranged marriages still happen here. I’ve known several people who ended up getting married this way and not a single one of them was happy about it.

      • trxxruraxvr@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        Arranged marriage is not the same as forced marriage, even though the latter is often framed as the former.

  • PhlubbaDubba@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 months ago

    In a less individualistic society the benefit a family gains by curating who an individual member can wed is seen as well worth it to occasionally have to emotionally and sometimes even physically beat them into submission because they genuinely hate their partner.

  • j4k3@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 months ago

    I don’t understand why marriage is a thing at all any more. I view it like a form of slavery, as unpopular as that may seem to some. Like the whole spend a ton on a special day bullshit is a nonsense way for most people to start their lives in any part of the world. A dowry is a slave payment. Any disproportionate mismatch of income or roles should just be a reason to part ways, or come to some kind of agreement between those two individuals only. If two people are incompatible, or unable to compel one another to stay, they shouldn’t.

    I look at it as various stages of human social evolution where some areas are closer to outright partnership slavery and some are slightly less. Very few people live with true equality and expectations in partnerships.

    • fine_sandy_bottom@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      This is really narrow minded.

      The term “arranged marriage” does not imply that the participants are not willing and eager. It’s not a disney story.

  • aoidenpa@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    I think throughout the history the amount of men that can’t marry because they lack social dominance was too much and societies developed strategies to overcome this issue.

    • AA5B@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      Personally, I believe it’s a strategy to improve social stability and wealth, after too many failed marriages based only on initial physical attraction.