I get that until recently it was considered normal and relatively cheap, but you are literally paying someone else to make food for you.

It can’t be sustainable without exploitation of workers and/or animal welfare to have that available to the majority of people on a regular basis.

If you can only afford fast food as a luxury, to me that seems like a good thing.

  • paddirn@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    edit-2
    25 days ago

    I would agree with most of this, if that excess cost was actually going towards paying the workers better or animal welfare. However, the excess costs are there because, maybe for a brief period, the companies had to raise their prices due to legitimate issues stemming from Covid. When the supply issues cleared up and costs should’ve gone back down though, everyone just collectively decided, “Why should we make it cheaper? They’ll still pay.” So that extra money we’re paying is to give the execs and shareholders more money. It’s greedflation and the exploitation of workers continues.

    Based on that though, we should punish companies where we can and stop going to fast food anyways, though given that prices also rose in the supermarket too, it’s like a drop in the bucket.

  • huginn@feddit.it
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    25 days ago

    Define expensive?

    Because labor isn’t the main cost of fast food as far as I’m aware. Doubling the wage of laborers saw only modest price changes in places that hiked minimum wage… Despite franchise owners being able to set their own prices.

    McDonald’s near me in NYC is more expensive than Alabama, sure - but it’s not double the price. ~$20 for 2 people to have 2 large meals with drinks is eminently reasonable.

    • yggstyle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      25 days ago

      While part of this is definitely some price gouging the reality is we are seeing inflation visibly occurring. Because ‘line go up’ requires a corporation to counteract inflation this is the result… unfortunately what isn’t inflating is consumer wages. The consumer is getting pinched and over time it is starting to take a toll. Welcome to the bubble, boys.

  • Prunebutt@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    25 days ago

    It can’t be sustainable without exploitation of workers

    Boy, I have a surprise about capitalism for you.

    There are such things as food deserts where fast food is the only viable option for people to get cheap food.

  • paultimate14@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    25 days ago

    It absolutely can be sustainable without exploiting labor. All it takes is for owners to settle for less profit.

    I’ve typed up and re-written a couple of paragraphs a few times just to realize I’d be better off linking this video. Basically, there used to be more business models in the food industry that helped to feed it an laborers- people who may not have a kitchen and probably didn’t have time to go buy groceries, cook, and clean. These businesses (automats, lunch wagons, diners) took a more utilitarian approach to food to make it affordable and nutritious, rather than the luxury experience “eating out” is today.