• jj4211@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    2 days ago

    I would suspect never.

    Either they are obsessed with their “work” and do it far more than that, or they do nothing.

      • MojoMcJojo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        Financial advisors for the Uber rich. I remember hearing an interview of one on…radio lab or this American life or… Something…I can’t remember it was years ago, but anyway she described what it was like. They don’t use passports, they would call her to find bracelets they lost in taxis, it didn’t sound like they were working at all. I don’t remember if she went into their work schedule, but financial advisors are treated like baby sitters, or at least she was.

        I thought that might be a good place to start, I’m sure some of them have written books about it, or done more interviews.

  • StaySquared@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 days ago

    I guess that would depend in what industry they’re working or if they’re making money from financial investments exclusively.

  • DigDoug@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    Just look at the industrial amounts of bullshit spewing from Elon Musk’s Twitter feed.

    Clearly the answer is no.

  • ShittyBeatlesFCPres@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    50
    ·
    4 days ago

    Definitely not 9-5, M-F. Most billionaires inherited substantial wealth to begin with. But executives, in general, don’t have “hours” in the same way as rank and file workers. It’s more about knowledge and meetings — well, hopefully knowledge — so you might have an 11am meeting, a 2pm call, and then a 7pm dinner with a potential investor or whatever. You don’t really “work” in between those obligations unless it’s a small company (where you probably aren’t a billionaire anyway). At most, you need to make a board report or PowerPoint for a presentation or something like that.

    Billionaires who just own things and aren’t in the C-suite don’t work much at all. Even if you’re on some boards, it’s not much in terms of actual obligations. There’s definitely tasks to do but it’s also definitely not a job. So, a bit like being a landlord.

  • Nibodhika@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    4 days ago

    I feel people still don’t understand how much a billion is. One Million dollars would still be life changing for most people here, but consider that 1 million seconds ago was 11 days ago, 1 Billion seconds ago was 31 years ago.

    To put it in another perspective, a very bad investment would yield you 0.1% monthly. This means that if a billionaire was to invest money the worst way possible, he would have to spend over 1 Million dollars per month to ever decrease his fortune.

    If you had an infinite money machine, that as long as you don’t spend more than a million per month it just keeps on growing, would you ever work? Yeah, thought so, billionaires are the same, they might have hobbies, and those hobbies might be something others consider work, but they’re not working.

    I personally believe that if a person ever gets 1 Billion dollars he should receive a letter congratulating them for winning capitalism, and informing them that any cent above 1 Billion will be taxed at 99.9999% (including investments).

    • BradleyUffner@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      4 days ago

      I’ve always liked the saying “The difference between a million dollars and a billion dollars is about a billion dollars” to really drive it home.

    • Aux@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 days ago

      I don’t know about a million being life changing. Can’t even buy a house for a million over here… Especially in USD, lol.

      • AnarchoSnowPlow@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 days ago

        It’s enough to wipe out most people’s student loans, and buy a reliable vehicle, then put a down payment on a house. That’s life changing.

        • Aux@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 days ago

          Well, lucky you. But when houses cost over £2m, £1m down payment won’t make me able to afford shit.

          • Nibodhika@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 days ago

            That’s still a 50% down payment on that house, your mortgage payments will be a lot less than your rent. So you’ll have a place of your own and more money every month, plus be investing in your capital instead of pissing money away. If that’s not life changing for you then nothing is.

            • Aux@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 days ago

              There’s a 4.5x household income limit for mortgages in the UK. So if your combined income is £60k (for a family where both parties have average UK income), the most money you can borrow is £270k. And then you look at something that’s not immediately falling apart and you see this https://www.zoopla.co.uk/for-sale/details/67606066/ you instantly know that you can’t afford anything even with £1m in your pocket.

              That’s unless you want to settle for a garage transformed into a “one bed house” https://www.zoopla.co.uk/for-sale/details/66317679/

              Another option would be to move to some part of London like Barking, but I’d rather live in a shed than a drug den.

              So yeah, I’m happy for you if £1m is life changing for you.

              • Nibodhika@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                3 days ago

                But also as a general rule places don’t let you spend over 30% of your income in rent, 60K that you mentioned for a couple is £4186 per month, so the maximum rent of that hypothetical person is £1256. Which wouldn’t also allow you to rent a house like the one you showed, so it’s pointless. The house where a couple that earns 60k lives can absolutely be bought for close to 1 million (if not less). Whoever is living in a 4 bedroom house like the one you pointed out earns a lot more than 60k and so they can finance the rest.

                • Aux@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  3 days ago

                  There’s no limit on rents in the UK. You can spend all of your money on it if you wish.

  • treefrog@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    It’s not work it’s more like a hobby. Work is what people do to survive. See working class vs owner class.

    Wealth hoarders can either obsess or not obsess about hoarding more wealth, like any person with a hobby.

    So, how much time they spend on their hobby and what hours they spend on their hobby really depends on their temperament.

  • AFK BRB Chocolate@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    4 days ago

    There isn’t one type. There are the ones like Bezos and Dell, who got rich by growing one or more businesses, and are still at it. They likely don’t work normal hours, but they likely work more than 40. Some of those, like Gates, get older and move on to other things like foundation work, but not an actual job. Hard to say what kind of hours they work. Then there are the ones like Christy Walton, who inherited their wealth and don’t really ever work.

  • lennybird@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    At some point they venture off to hobbies and try to pat themselves on the back with a bit of philanthropy.