• Death_Equity@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    48
    ·
    3 months ago

    Realistically Franklin: “So the women of today bathe regularly, are shaven, are disease free, and can decide to be incapable of pregnancy, and I can search for them easily in every city?!”

    Jefferson: “You centralized the banks?!”

  • neatchee@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    “What the fuck is the internet?”

    Then Ben Affleck would show them movie poop shoot dot com to demonstrate

    Bahnnngggg

  • HelixDab2@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    3 months ago

    Wait, you let the negroes vote? You let women vote? You let people that don’t own property vote?

  • d00phy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    3 months ago

    I think they would be surprised either that we still adhere to the Constitution (I.e., we haven’t replaced or rewritten it), or that there are so few amendments.

    • stoy@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 months ago

      The usual stuff, propaganda and outright lies, but the most effective way is through echo chambers…

      Just make people able to pick and choose with what communities they want to engage with and soon plenty of people will form self-radicalizing communities.

  • Ellia Plissken@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    3 months ago

    I think they would say, “what’s this I hear about women voting? and, uh, who was that in the White House from 2012-2020?? was that one of Thomas Jefferson’s grandchildren?”

  • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    3 months ago

    “What do you mean you might elect a black woman” is probably a big one they’ll be mad about. They weren’t good people

  • Passerby6497@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    Washington: “Wait, all my slaves are free?!? I can’t just keep moving them every 5 months to keep them from their freedom?”

  • NeoNachtwaechter@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    Personal power, leadership abilities, integrity and morals were much stronger with these people, and in their times in general.

    So I think they would ask:

    How do you think you can lead a country when you are such a bunch of corrupted whimps?

    • frankPodmore@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      3 months ago

      Personal power, leadership abilities, integrity and morals were much stronger with these people, and in their times in general.

      There’s just no reason at all to think this. Most obviously, people who signed their names to the idea ‘all men were created equal’ while themselves owning slaves quite obviously did not possess a high degree of moral integrity.

        • frankPodmore@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          True, but one that conveniently allowed them to do what they were already doing anyway. As I say: not titans of moral probity.

      • NeoNachtwaechter@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        while themselves owning slaves

        I did not say that it was good morals (from today’s point of view: most of what they did was actually criminal). I said strong ones.

        • frankPodmore@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 months ago

          Having strong morals is mutually exclusive with compromising your morals to enrich yourself, which we’ve established is something they did.

      • originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        There’s just no reason at all to think this. Most obviously, people who signed their names to the idea ‘all men were created equal’ while themselves owning slaves quite obviously did not possess a high degree of moral integrity.

        could this have been a tree they planted knowing they would not live to see fruit?

        • frankPodmore@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          That may explain why they didn’t abolish slavery, but does not justify the fact that they themselves owned slaves.

    • Crackhappy@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 months ago

      Interesting take. I presume you’ve never actually read any of the founding father’s treatises.

      • NeoNachtwaechter@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        No, of course not, since I do not live in their corrupted country.

        And you should not judge people only according to what they write.