• blind3rdeye@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    3 months ago

    With the stuff about ‘super computers’, this seems more like a shitpost than a science meme.

  • LNRDrone@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    3 months ago

    Somehow they also designed them so the tube goes stale roughly 2 minutes after opening it. Also the lovely texture reminiscent of sawdust. Truly a marvel of engineering.

    • M137@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      44
      ·
      3 months ago

      I don’t think you’re supposed to eat the tube, shouldn’t matter that it goes stale.

    • smeg@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 months ago

      “Once you pop you can’t stop” is actually a warning about this

  • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    3 months ago

    This meme is wrong and likely based on a Reddit post that is itself wrong.

    “TIL that in the '50s P&G used a supercomputer for designing Pringles…”

    The only source I found referencing pringles association with a supercomputer was a 2007 article with this sentence:

    Pringles potato chips are designed using [supercomputing] capabilities – to assess their aerodynamic features so that on the manufacturing line they don’t go flying off the line," said Dave Turek, vice president of deep computing at IBM.)

    Pringle’s didn’t exist until 1968. Why would they waste a decade’s worth of supercomputing time (per the Reddit post that they were designed in the “‘50s using a supercomputer”) to design a potato chip?

    It does not state that the chips were designed in ‘68 with a supercomputer. It directly states that “today’s supercomputers”…”are creating potato chips”, so their current design was done that way for the purposes of expedited manufacturing processes.

    The Reddit posts even links to the article stating that the reference for supercomputer usage in Pringle’s design is modern.

  • arin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    3 months ago

    Also abot 10-15% of thr chips crumble at the bottom to cushion the rest of the pringles

  • sundray@lemmus.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    3 months ago

    I remember reading somewhere that they also deliberately put different amounts of flavorant on each side of the chip so that you can choose to have more or less flavor intensity based on which side you place against your tongue.

    • StereoTrespasser@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      If by deliberate you mean the sprayers that spray all the artificial flavors, liquefied added nutrients, and related shit are on top of the “chip” as it moves down a conveyor, then sure I guess it’s deliberate.

      • SkyezOpen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        Which sucks because right way up it fits perfectly around your tongue so it’s very easy to eat. But if you want the flavor, you gotta flip it over and it’s harder to completely cover it with your mouth, resulting in crumbs flying everywhere.

      • sundray@lemmus.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        lol, well it was Pringles propaganda, so I’m sure they were trying to make themselves look like they spared no expense “engineering” their snack food. 😆