If 23 and Me goes bankrupt, they will sell all of the biometric data they’ve collected over decades to the highest bidder. Why can’t the US government step in to purchase the company and establish a public trust?

  • 11111one11111@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    54
    ·
    22 days ago

    Why would the government care? Lol they don’t care about a genocide or crippling medical care costs why would they decide to have a moral compass now?

    • HessiaNerd@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      21 days ago

      Honestly, the law enforcement implications of the government buying the database is just as scary as a 3rd party. Hell I bet a company buys the data and sells access to the FBI, and local law enforcement for a subscription fee.

        • HessiaNerd@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          21 days ago

          You answered your own question. So they don’t need a warrant. For a fee, they can run ALL DNA collected against just about everyone, no probable cause required.

          • Excrubulent@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            21 days ago

            I don’t even know if that would be legal, but that doesn’t matter. The fee creates a little bit of disconnection so both parties can assume that questions of legality are the others’ responsibility.

            This doesn’t make it legal either, it just makes it more likely to happen, and slightly harder to prosecute.

        • Milk_Sheikh@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          21 days ago

          Cuz they print the money and set policing budgets astronomically high. A warrant requires paperwork and a judge (though FISA made that a joke), just buying it outright is far easier.

  • zephorah@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    22 days ago

    How accurate is that data? I have a relative who received different results from their family tree than expected. So they sent it in again. Different results. Annoyed, they sent on yet another test. Again, different results. Not slight either, entire additions and subtractions.

    • SkaveRat@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      22 days ago

      very accurate in my case.

      You really need to be careful when taking the samples. No eating, drinking and especially no kissing etc for a couple hours (at least 1h iirc)

    • gedaliyah@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      21 days ago

      They are rife with differences. They have improved over time, but they generally don’t really identify specific ancestry. Rather, they use statistical patterns to correlate self-reported ancestry.

  • HessiaNerd@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    22 days ago

    Why should they?

    Anyone who used 23 and Me agreed that their genetic code was able to be used my 23 and Me for whatever they want. Why is it now the job of the government to jump in and give those people retroactive protection.

    • EleventhHour@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      22 days ago

      Because those people never agreed to it being used by anyone else. And it’s in the public interest to protect everyone from their highly-sensitive biometric data being misused.

  • 667@lemmy.radio
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    21 days ago

    I’m surprised nobody mentioned the film Gattaca, which is centered around genetic identity.

  • nimpnin@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    22 days ago

    Wouldn’t it be just a lot easier to prevent them from selling it in the first place

  • ShittyBeatlesFCPres@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    21 days ago

    As a practical matter, this is less concerning to me than data breaches like the Equifax one where my social security number and everything else were compromised. I can think of ways 23 And Me data can be misused but, aside from police (who could get the data anyway), most of them are kind of theoretical or contingent on technological developments.

    Like, 23 And Me data going to the highest bidder is obviously disturbing but I’m not sure it’s an immediate danger in the same way as all our SSN’s being sold on the dark web. I’d rather nationalize credit reporting agencies than the unprofitable ancestry report company.

  • leaky_shower_thought@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    22 days ago

    I couldn’t think of any public trust that’s going to benefit to a buy out like this.

    To me, it totally makes sense for a private entity/ corpo to handle private data [with consent] from its clients.

    I see this as more like the old 23andMe had a private service going on that can’t the public sector doesn’t. It doesn’t make sense for the government the size of USA to prioritize/suddenly adjust policies and provide the same service.

    What could be possible is for local governments to step up via public petitions – but even that could be a stretch in terms of cash-in-hand.

    • minorkeys@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      21 days ago

      Yet Millions of the same public gave 23nme their genetic data for basically nothing. So maybe trust isn’t the angle.