I don’t mean double-wides, I mean quality modular houses.

  • reddig33@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    16 days ago

    Modular would be more popular if it didn’t cost as much as standard construction. It’s bizarre how expensive it is.

    • someguy3@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      16 days ago

      Lots of processes need to be sorted out. Need steady demand. It’s an interesting business.

  • ultranaut@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    16 days ago

    People have been trying to make modular housing work for awhile, with limited success. For various reasons, it’s a lot more challenging than it seems like it should be. One of the problems is that the US doesn’t really have a single national regulatory regime for building codes, they are mostly local and regional. You can’t really design a house that works everywhere so the economics are a lot different than selling something like a car or a washing machine.

    • someguy3@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      16 days ago

      I think a large part of it is consistent demand, and that must be regional because of the size and shipping of the final product. Hurricanes solve both to some extent.

  • ashok36@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    16 days ago

    Modular or not, when there’s 10-12’ of storm surge and/or river flooding, it doesn’t matter. Houses built today generally handle cat 3 and even cat 4 storm winds without much problem. It’s the flooding that’s the killer.

  • ProdigalFrog@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    edit-2
    16 days ago

    There really oughta be a hurricane-proof trend, like dome houses, and for the coastline, domes on stilts.

  • Blaster M@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    15 days ago

    If you can make modulars out of concrete instead of balsa wood that would be great. Otherwise, bring on the shipping container houses…

    • someguy3@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      15 days ago

      Shipping container houses are terrible ideas. You want insulation, windows, plumbing, etc. They don’t work well in those small steel containers.

      • Flocklesscrow@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        14 days ago

        "It is possible to insulate the outside of a shipping container instead of the inside.

        This method of insulation is known as “over-cladding” or “external insulation” and involves adding a layer of insulation to the outside of the container before covering it with cladding or other weather-resistant materials"

        • someguy3@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          14 days ago

          Seriously? It’s surface area to volume problem. You have this tiny box. And then you have problems with doors, Hvac, etc. Sorry but the whole idea is idiotic.

          • Flocklesscrow@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            14 days ago

            People just want affordable homes- a cornerstone feature of pretty much every modern generation before Millennials.

            Obviously there are better ways to build a home, but those avenues seem closed.

            • someguy3@lemmy.worldOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              14 days ago

              Shipping container houses are not it. I’d call it a scam, but that typically requires something actually for sale. But if it helps: it’s a scam.