I can tell it’s your post from the titles. It appears you’ve confused shit posting with asinine posting.
Reminds me a the Facebook groups that claim to be dark humor but are really just right wing hate posts because the poorly educated don’t understand that they are incapable of recognizing the difference.
I imagine the same is at play here.
I believe you are a smart, intelligent person worthy of respect and the air you breathe.
Good. Makes no sense for all those features to be under the settings app.
Next time he falls out of the news cycle: “I really miss rape culture.”
If I end up on try that jury, not guilty.
Don’t. Terribly over rated movie.
Reactionary company creating reactionary advertisement for reactionary people in an attempt to sell reactionary devices to a reactionary user base.
Citation needed.
This is long and I got bored but skimming it, it sounds like he was being stubborn about returning the items because he felt aggrieved. I can’t really feel much sympathy for his situation.
Amazon has definitely declined but this isn’t the shinning example I was hoping it to be.
App Stores need to track the user to determine if the user has installed the website app before.
The EU demanded Apple allow third party stores and if Apple didn’t implement these with the same feature set available to Apples store, the complaints would be focused there instead.
There are people who like to pick on Apple and most of them are technologically illiterates. This was true long before Apple become insanely profitable with the iPhone. It will continue to be true for the foreseeable future.
Haters need to hate. Apple haters are a distinct fetish.
Order for pick up. They give those workers a handset that optimizing their walk through store.
The fact that they have this and don’t make it part of the customer experience is another reason these companies are fucks.
They want you to wander and spend more. Physical dark patterns. Grocery stores are full of them.
Nah, they just realized it was being given away for free. They need to restrict it so they can sell it to advertisers.
When the government says to start preserving records, you start preserving records.
There is no need to pretend this is some government posture over secure messaging. This literally about the lack of saving those messages. How they were sent is irrelevant as long as a copy can be provided.
I argue this isn’t an observation on one’s monetary wealth but rather their self worth.
The topic of the post isn’t about how to act rich but rather how the rich act in ways that differ from those without that status. Anyone can have a high self worth.
Claiming that people who are poor earn it by having lesser self worth is a way to blame the poor for being poor.
It is a dangerous line of reasoning that I felt worth pointing out.
He’s claiming to know others minds. That’s not experience.
What you’re describing has nothing to do with poor vs rich.
Your belief in social and economic mobility indicates this is your cooping mechanism.
You are finding a way to blame poor people for their inequality. That’s a much better example of the difference between poor and rich thinking.
The real trick there is how he didn’t get sued.
The SEC has held him more accountable than the share holders
You aren’t half as amusing as you think you are.
Any laughter you hear is at you, never with you.
People merely tolerate you.
You peaked at conception. I know because I was there. I’m not your daddy though, just a member of that night’s train.