• Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    130
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Imo, the only solution is every device with an antenna must be legally required to put a manual off switch.

    Cell service, wifi, Bluetooth, any future service. If it broadcasts it needs a physical off switch.

    If I sold my car to a government official and they found out I had hidden a camera, microphone and GPS in the car, I’d get a visit from the FBI. Yet companies do it with impunity. Does the CEO of Subaru have recordings of Bernie Sanders driving in his car?

    • DontTakeMySky@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      38
      ·
      2 months ago

      And each type of communication needs it’s own switch. Don’t let them pull some BS trying to make you enable all the hardcore tracking via a cell network just because you want to connect to Bluetooth.

    • aliceblossom@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 months ago

      For phones, Pinephone is very nearly this. The only thing is that GPS and cell service are on the same switch (because they’re handled by the same chip on the board)

  • bleistift2@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    54
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    We cannot stop collecting data about you because collecting the datum that you want to stop having your data collected failed.

    I wonder if the situation in Europe is different, where such bullshit is illegal.

  • LordKitsuna@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    45
    ·
    2 months ago

    I feel like not buying a Honda would be a pretty good way to opt out. In fact since the majority of car manufacturers are doing this bullshit I feel like simply not purchasing a new car is a great way to opt out of this.

    Plenty of older not smart cars that are perfectly usable or fairly easily restored no reason to go dropping the money on a brand new one that’s not only a privacy disaster but a repairability disaster on top of it.

    I think my favorite is how almost all new cars now come with a sealed transmission with absolutely no way to replace the fluid in it with the claims of it being a “lifetime fluid” there is no such thing as a transmission fluid that can last and do its job forever, what they mean by LifeTime fluid is that it will last long enough to satisfy the warranty. And what they have deemed should be the usable life of the car.

    • Malfeasant@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 months ago

      Cars are just catching up to HVAC systems… In the last 3 years I’ve had to replace both inside and outside fan motors because their (maintenance free) bearings failed.

    • RaoulDook@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      Shit I hadn’t heard about that sealed transmission thing, that’s fucked up. Transmission fluid replacement seemed pretty important on the maintenance schedule of all the cars I’ve had

      • LordKitsuna@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 months ago

        It’s been happening for a long time, even some cars is far back as 2012 have a supposed lifetime fluid. Although they at least still have the drain bolt so that you can say yeah that’s cute and do it anyway. But lately the drain bolt has gone away and they are completely sealed meaning you can’t change it even if you want to

        • Railing5132@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          Just today I said goodbye to my 2012 chrysler minivan because of the “lifetime sealed transmission.” Now Chrysler minivan transaxles have always been garbage, this is known. But mine said in the owner’s manual, “lifetime, sealed transaxle” “no fluid fills or dipstick.” I worked at a Chrysler shop and asked the service manager - “nope, don’t need to do nothin’.” OK, all good.

          Yeaahhh… That’s not entirely true. 160k on the odo and it lost the desire to ‘go’ in drive (no forward progress in drive despite the little engine trying it’s best), a hell of a scream coming from the engine bay and a light show of errors on the dash. Limped it home and the code reader said that gears 1 & 3 had a “ratio mismatch” which should only happen if they lost teeth, and a couple others I don’t remember. Figured it was scrap. Had a mechanic friend look at it; he popped off a tube, fingered it a bit, sniffed it and said to try changing out the filter and as much fluid as I could. Did that, dropped about 5qt in (with no goddamned dipstick, how do you tell how much it needs?) and the thing ran great for another 3 months. Until today when it started making the whining noise again. Dropped it off and said goodbye.

          Fuck “sealed” transmissions. Sorry, I had to rant. I loved that van - no tracking, had a Sirius radio that has 50 song and 50 artist alerts and 300gb on board mp3 storage, and the 2 screen DVD system (great for parents that don’t want their kids on tablets but still want to occupy them on long trips)

      • ezmac@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        I believe Honda started this in the early 2000s because they found that transmissions were compromised at earlier mileages at a much more frequent rate from leaks, bad fluid changes, or missing the intervals, than were actually failing from use. So they designed the cars for how they were actually being used and maintained. It’s kind of a non-issue unless you’ve got 300k+ miles on your transmission, at which point you’d expect to potentially replace it anyway.

  • njm1314@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    ·
    2 months ago

    Are any of you even able to afford new cars? Who the hell’s buying this shit? I probably won’t have a new car ever.

  • andros_rex@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    2 months ago

    I’m never buying a Honda again after buying a 2018 Civic model. Less than 10k on it when I bought it and the A/C went out. There’s an issue with the condenser on the 2018/2019 Hondas. They offered to pay HALF of what it’d cost to fix - I’d still be out more than a thousand. And from research online, apparently the replacements tend to fail too.

    Pretty much every time I see the same model I ask if the owner has AC. They always have the same problem. It’s going to be real wonderful driving when it gets to the 100’s this summer…

    • Breadwurd@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 months ago

      2018 civic owner here. Had the same issue with the A/C. Has anyone else had the paint flake off on the mirrors/door handles?

    • Railing5132@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      So we were told: “it may be covered by this recall, if it’s the parts that are covered by the recall that are the cause of the loss of A/C. If those parts aren’t the reason, it won’t be covered, and the diagnostic to determine that would then be $1,000$.”

      So we have to take a $1,000 gamble to see if our 2018 car is covered under a fucking recall. Fuck Honda in the ass with a rusty anchor.

  • sin_free_for_00_days@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    2 months ago

    Remember when gov’t banned Furbies (sp?) in some places? Seems like they would make the same decision for a lot of people in important positions regarding their car purchasing.

  • Snapz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Before I click in, does anyone have any background on the source link author org/individual, haven’t seen this outlet before?

  • abhibeckert@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    The hero photo for the article shows a camera over a road that likely is likely running number plate recognition software…

    Honestly I’d be more worried about where that data is going than the tracking software in your car. They’ve got the most critical information (where did you drive and when), and they’ve got it for every car instead of just Honda drivers.

    This needs to be fixed with legislation, and it needs to be fixed actively. For example by getting rid of number plates entirely and replacing them with something like the transponders used in aircrafts and ships, but with an encrypted rolling code that only shares your data when authorised to do so (by the owner of the vehicle).

    Apple “Find My” works like that… your location is encrypted, and it’s uploaded without any identifying information. When the user brings up a map looking for their keys, that’s the only time encryption keys are handed over allowing the already stored information to be accessed. The car version of that could be police asking you at every traffic stop to hit a button on your dashboard that unlocks your registration/insurance details so they can run a quick check against their outstanding warrant/etc database.

  • heartsofwar@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    2 months ago

    I think there needs to be more government involvement and protection in how data is collected, shared, and consumed; however, I also think people don’t realize that their perception of ‘privacy’ has always had the major benefit of being from the perspective of an individual that largely is unprofitable.

    Many celebrities would very likely tell the public that ‘privacy’ is largely a myth and the reason their perspective is that way is because their lives, activities, and actions are viewed as profitable to someone. A lucrative paycheck from acquiring that salacious photo in a vulnerable position, etc is a big motivator, and if the celebrity gets mad at the paparazzi, there’s even more news about how the celebrity lost their shit for all the world to see; however, if the celebrity embraces the media and tries to work with them to conserve what little ‘privacy’ they have, there is negative news about how the celebrity is fake or too controlling about their image. At the end of the day, these celebrities simply want to have dinner out with family or friends and they can’t.

    The general public isn’t used to the idea that someone cares enough about every nuanced detail of their decisions that it would matter… but it does. Sadly, a celebrity must spend thousands of dollars to secure their privacy, and even then it isn’t a guarantee… what hope do we have? In today’s society we use debit or credit cards, but all of the transactions are data mined by the banks and privacy is non-existent; however, with cash you have some built-in ‘privacy’ because at its core it is not easily profitable to track.

    And that is the point; Data collection is slowly bridging the gap between a celebrity’s reality and normal everyday human perception of ‘privacy’.

  • Thorny_Insight@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    2 months ago

    I was just thinking yesterday what car I would get if I had infinite money and while I’m sure such one probably exists I couldn’t came up with one that I’d like better than my -07 Nissan Navara. I mean yeah I would ofcourse do a total overhaul on it and add a bunch of offroad accessories and such but the truck itself basically has everything I need and switching to a newer one would just add stuff I dont want.

    I like cars and trucks but I’m extremely uninterested in most of the new ones. Something similar happened with them as with smartphones when they turned from tools into fashion accessories you use to show off to your friends. Can’t we just have ones that are decent looking and come with the basic necesary features and nothing more? I want it simple, reliable and easy to fix. I don’t want a computer on wheels.

  • dual_sport_dork@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    2 months ago

    Crap like this is why I ride a motorcycle.

    Only one of my bikes even manages to have enough electronics in it to have a clock.

    • BearOfaTime@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 months ago

      Not always.

      Sometimes it’s so integrated into the other systems there’s no separate component to “rip out”.

      You may be able to pull the antenna cable and put a dummy on it (like used for testing radios). It’ll absorb all the RF from the transmitter.

      • TherouxSonfeir@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        I’m sure it only has one. And I’m not sure you know how ownership works. It’s privacy I’m more concerned about.

        • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          My point is people shouldn’t need to try to outsmart the car manufacturer for basic privacy rights. If you don’t fully control something you don’t own something.

          Imagine if they remotely bricked a bunch of vehicles. (Ransomware maybe?) You would be powerless to stop them and out of luck. I’m sure there would be a lawsuit but you still would be without a car.

          Disconnecting the antenna is probably not a bad idea but the problem is cars have become black box computers so you never know where there could be a weakness. For all you know it might be possible to crash the car systems via Bluetooth.

          What I want is some user freedom laws plus some DMCA exceptions for consumers looking to escape vendor lock in. Privacy protections would also be nice but being able to change and examine software would be a step in the right direction.