I think he will, but there might be a real primary challenge.

  • neidu2@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    101
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    I’m leaning towards “no”. His fragile ego will have taken two nasty blows in a row. Plus in four years he’ll be even older and more fragile, and it’s already pretty bad.

    If I’m right, I’m sure he’ll endorse some other maga-clown instead.

    • BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 months ago

      I think he’s really good at compartmentalization and it wouldn’t surprise me if deep down he does think the election was stolen from him. I also don’t think he’ll be satisfied being on the political sidelines so he’ll run as long as he’s able.

  • Don_Dickle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    2 months ago

    No because in a video I just saw when he was speaking to a group of christians he said this is the election you need to vote in because when he is president there will be no more voting. He said this three times just to reinforce it.

    • paddirn@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      35
      ·
      2 months ago

      Obviously just locker room talk. People are just taking his comments about ending democracy and becoming a dictator on day one out of context. He’s speaking metaphorically.

      –“Centrists” still voting for Trump, probably

    • Sean@lemmy.worldM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 months ago

      I’d like to believe that congress would never allow him to change the constitution and subvert due process, but you just never know what might happen with this guy.

  • circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    2 months ago

    Tbh, I hope so. I think the chances of his winning decline with every cycle that is a loss. But, his ability to split a vote is retained to some extent. So:

    • if he runs as the GOP candidate again, he’s more likely to lose. If the GOP is split about it, he’s more likely to have a split vote due to another conservative candidate opting into the race on a third ticket (this may not happen, in which case, he’s just less likely to win anyway due to previous losses, increased age, etc).

    • if he isn’t the GOP candidate but still runs, he’s extremely unlikely to win but could be a crazy vote split.

    I think any sane person would not run again. Trump might, though.

    • desentizised@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      2 months ago

      Thing is, the RNC is cleptocratically his now and will be for a while. Other than that I’d hope for similar things as most people are commenting here. It will be bonkers either way until he stops breathing and then some.

    • ArtVandelay@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 months ago

      His views on exercise are indeed bizarre. Apparently the moron thinks all humans have a finite amount of energy like a battery, which is why he never exercises.

  • exanime@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Doubt it, his decline in the last 8 years have been incredible. If he were a family member we would have been looking for professional help a long time ago.

    Can’t imagine he’d be able to remain aware of his surroundings in 2 more years

  • hperrin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    2 months ago

    I think if he loses in 24 and the republicans don’t learn their lesson, then they deserve to have him run again in 28.

    Also, he’s very old. He would be 82 in 2028.

  • Sensitivezombie@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    2 months ago

    Whether he runs again is not the right question. The council for national policy, an extreme right organization, is behind trumpism, supreme court justices trump nominated, and project 2025 which has been around since Reagan era but with different names. They will choose a different candidate as their wrecking ball who is younger and as fiery, unethical, without principles and an “outsider” as trump represent. Whether it’s JD Vance or someone else.

    • Riccosuave@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 months ago

      I don’t think that will work. I’ve had this same thought, but there just isn’t anybody in the public lexicon who fits the bill.

    • banshee@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      Agreed. A lot of money has been spent on crafting agenda and shaping public and party opinions. Although malicious, Project 2025 seems carefully considered. I assume the wealthy investors bankrolling the project have considered Trump’s mortality as well.

      • cosmicrookie@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        No. They are susceptible to be influenced and manipulated by populist ideas. If it isn’t Trump someone else will do the same with them.

          • ben_dover@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            2 months ago

            true, but i think the comment aims more at “it doesn’t have to be this specific con man, they’d fall for other con men too just the same way”

            • Rivalarrival@lemmy.today
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              My point is that anyone can be conned by the right con man. Our status as Trump opposers does not render us immune to malicious deceit.

              I don’t mean to excuse the trumpists entirely. I’m just pointing out that without Trump to focus them, they don’t become radicalized, and never become a problem.

              • aberrate_junior_beatnik@midwest.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                2 months ago

                Trump voters are the victim of a con, but the con is bigger than Trump. Conservatism in general is a con that needs misinformation networks like talk radio, fox news, facebook groups, etc. Without having been steeped in that bullshit for 40+ years, Trump would never have succeeded. It’s the whole ecosystem that’s doing the radicalization, not just Trump.

            • jj4211@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              I think the counterpoint is that it seems not that common for one and only one con man to milk this voting base. Trump seems to be special in that he has nearly a monopoly, where as others would probably be in stronger competition and stuck splitting the populace.

    • njm1314@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      64
      ·
      2 months ago

      Man I understand sensitivity, but getting preemptively mad that someone might mention that in 4 years a really old guy could die of old age seems weird to me.

      • Riccosuave@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        2 months ago

        How would that even be against the rules? Pointing out an old guy might die is the epitome of “no shit Sherlock” posting.

      • Sean@lemmy.worldM
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        Just a preemptive warning. I’ve seen political threads get pretty heated. ;)