I know it’s been getting worse over time, but I could still find what I needed after some digging.

Recently it’s been like 10 minutes of adjusting search terms, still getting completely useless or irrelevant results, and me just giving up afterwards. Other search engines seem just as bad.

  • TerkErJerbs@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    108
    ·
    6 months ago

    *years? Yes. It used to be the bleeding edge of search and now it’s just profit driven enshittification like the rest of ai-ridden garbage tech wallstreet bullshit.

    • Linnce@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      6 months ago

      The other day I asked google what season we were in. The AI got it wrong, and that’s like the simplest question ever.

    • TheBeesKnees@lemmy.sdf.orgOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 months ago

      It has definitely been getting worse over years, but I specifically meant the last couple of weeks. I could still find what I needed between all the garbage… now I can’t even find it after adjusting the search multiple times.

  • TommySoda@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    6 months ago

    I was honestly getting so frustrated the other day at work when searching for something very specific and coming up empty handed. Tried DuckDuckGo and even fucking Bing and found what I needed in a matter of seconds. Google search is trash now. I have to go to the second page or further just to find something that isn’t an ad, AI response, or reddit. None of which are helpful.

  • Zerlyna@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    The results are usually the most clicked, not necessarily the factual links. Others have recommended kagi. I haven’t tried it yet. I remember when the internet started and you had to use them all!

        • bobs_monkey@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          Incognito is on your client side browser in that the browser doesn’t retain any trace of the current session once you close the tab. The search engine still knows what you whacked off to.

        • inb4_FoundTheVegan@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          True Incognito mode is a myth, it only stops keeping a history in the tab of that browser. Everytime you use a browser to go to any site ever, the browser logs you went there. So does your ISP and the site your connecting to. No matter which mode or browser you use, if you go to Google, then Google knows you went there and logs your searches.

          The closest you can come to browsing the web anonymously would be with a mix of dedicated privacy OS like Tails and either a VPN or Tor as a middile man, but that assumes those proxys are not corrupted. Free VPNs make money by selling your “secret browsing” habits.

          The internet is nothing more than wires, if you connect your wire to someone elses, every intermediatary knows.

          • Blizzard@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 months ago

            You can use uBlock Origin and other privacy add-ons to block tracking and a VPN to hide your IP address but if you’re logged in to a search engine’s account then everything you search is tied to you no matter what you do.

    • TheBeesKnees@lemmy.sdf.orgOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 months ago

      I’ve used Kagi’s free trial. I’d turn to it when nothing else was helping and it did really well, but recently it hasn’t been helping either. It’s probably still fine for most things, but I’m often searching niche developer/programming things that are too burried under SEO/AI spam to find anymore.

      • sudneo@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 months ago

        FWIW, the default “programming” lens works quite well in Kagi, you can also create your own lens if you have a set of websites from which you routinely search info, and there are tons of bangs already (which can also be mapped to lenses BTW). In addition, you can downrank AI/SEO stuff when you find it (it is downranked by default in kagi), so that over time your results are quite clean.

      • Jeffool @lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        A string is just a collection of characters, in programmer speak. When you use quotation marks in your search to find exactly what you want. If your search was:

        dog “fast drive”

        Google used to show results that only had both the word “dog” and the joined phrase “fast drive” in the same result. Or tell you there were no results.

        Now it feels like Google uses that as a suggestion, giving you “dog” and any combination of “fast drive”, “fast driver”, “fast driving”, or whatever else Google thinks you want, instead of what you asked for. Or if they don’t find it, they serve you up whatever they want, with a small message about there being no matching results.

  • gusgalarnyk@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    6 months ago

    I recommend Kagi, I’ve been using it for about six months now and results - especially small web results like blogs - are so much better. I also have a pretty good time image searching compared to when I was on Google.

    Yes it’s paid, but that to me is the price of resisting enshittification. Find a company that isn’t a publicly traded for-profit world-burner and pay them for their service. Is the idea of paying for email and search an alien concept to me? Yes. But I’m either paying Google whatever €120 a year in eyeballs on ads and an increasingly worse experience, or I’m paying €80 a year and getting a markedly better experience.

    Now it’s up to Kagi and Proton to not turn into shitty companies while other competitors catch up and we have a thriving ecosystem again.

    • Pringles@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      6 months ago

      I second kagi. Have been using it for almost a year now and I will stick with it. I switched from google to ddg some years ago to ddg before, but kagi is simply better.

      A colleague also uses it and is also very satisfied with it.

      • gusgalarnyk@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        6 months ago

        I’ve read it, I read the discussion around it, idk man. One guy’s thoughts on a company and it’s founder isn’t enough to move me off of something without better proof, better alternatives, and worse crimes than maybe having a bad long term vision.

        Hopefully every company outgrows it’s founder and becomes a system. We’ll have to see, right now I’m satisfied and that gets me off Google and signals to others I’m willing to pay.

  • Subverb@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    6 months ago

    Google makes money on ads. They make $300-$400 annually per user by displaying ads.

    They are motivated to tarpit you in order to show you more ads.

    Giving you your results quickly and efficiently costs them revenue.

    Use kagi, or another search engine.

    • Cock_Inspecting_Asexual@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      Is it sorta built similar to google? I keep switching search engines but Im SOOOOO used to google that its hard for me to adjust. I need something that kinda looks like google, but I can both Customize it more and just isnt google.

      • Cock_Inspecting_Asexual@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        aHHH NAHHH i just tried it. It’s everything I want BUT THEY MAKE ME PAY TO SEARCH??! fuck no- I’m not about to fork over cash for a Subscriptions to USE THE INTERNET. Sounds really really nice but I’d much rather not. They aught to have it so you can pay for extra perks but paying JUST to search??? I’m good-

    • smackjack@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      I remember Google saying like 2 decades ago that it was actually their goal to get you off of their website as quickly as possible. If you clicked on a link, and then clicked back in less than 30 seconds, then Google would consider that search result to be not what you were looking for.

  • tobyond@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    6 months ago

    Google Maps is utter crap lately too. It seems to be making up locations, and several times in the past month, it’s taken me to the wrong place. It’s getting almost as bad as Apple Maps

    • TommySoda@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      6 months ago

      My favorite one recently is constantly telling me to keep straight to remain on a highway like 7 times before I need to actually get off the highway. Glad I turned off the sound a long time ago otherwise I would have lost my fucking mind.

      • shyguyblue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 months ago

        We have express (toll) lanes on some highways around me, and the navigation system loses its damn mind every time. “Keep going straight”, “continue going straight”, “proceed in a trajectory perpendicular to your current trajectory”; I fucking get it!

    • trainsaresexy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 months ago

      I went to a low data plan and learned that Google Maps consumes a vast amount of data (relative to my plan limit), and I download all my maps and had location off. 1 single bus route between two pinned locations was 30Mb. Maps and search could be so simple but they are insanely bloated.

    • TheBeesKnees@lemmy.sdf.orgOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      Oh god, yes this too. All the sponsored location spam drives me crazy. I love when I zoom in to a location and it doesn’t mark ANY of the shops besides STARBUCKStm

    • QuarterSwede@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      Hey now, Apple Maps is more accurate, provides better directions where I am, has more up to date satellites imagery, and has been this way for years. I only use Google Maps to search because Yelp is god awful. I live in a rapidly expanding area and all of that matters.

  • SmokeyDope@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    I used to a hater of Kagi but honestly its a damn good alternative search engine. They are doing some actual innovation and are very transparent. I still prefer a good searXNG instance but searxng is more for technical people who understand decentralized meta search instances. Here’s my simple guide on search engine alternatives to help you get away from google best you can.

    Google is finally collapsing under the weight of its own greed and lack of innovation. Now other companies are showing up to steal their lunch especial with the big monopoly case going on right now.

      • angrystego@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        6 months ago

        Thank you both, Smokeydope and LucidNightmare. That was an interesting read! I gave SearXNG (paulgo.io) a try and it was a refreshing experience, I’m going to start using it regularly to see how well it does.

        • LucidNightmare@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          Thank you for actually reading what was provided! SearXNG is pretty good, and I kinda want to give self hosting it a try! Good luck on the hunt!

        • SmokeyDope@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          I am glad to have helped you out! @angrystego I hope you enjoy searxng and it bcomes a useful tool in your life. Paulgo is an excellent first instance choice. It was my daily driver when I wrote up that guide and seems to still hold up well today.

          Now I use search.inetol.net and can recommend that as a good alternative in case paulgo isnt quite what you’re looking for or has too many timeout api errors. As always its a good idea to visit searx.space and try out some of the top instances with highest response time.

      • sudneo@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 months ago

        An article full of inaccuracies, but the most interesting bit is, all these conversations are possible because they clearly explain their views, which are publicly available on their website (for example, the philosophy behind the use of AI - which BTW is opt-in).

        How is that an example of being opaque is beyond me.

        • LucidNightmare@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          Might want to go through and click the hyperlinks. Otherwise, I got nothing else to tell ya homie. It’s all right there.

  • souperk@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    6 months ago

    I have fully switched to kagi, it’s not perfect but for the average case it’s better than google.

  • superkret@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    6 months ago

    The internet has gotten worse in general, and it’s accelerating.
    The vast majority of online content is now AI-generated.

  • Fades@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    6 months ago

    HAHAHAHAHAH no. Google Search has gotten so much worse in the last couple of YEARS more like.

    The reason behind this is not a bug but a feature. Google wants the trip from search to result to take longer as they can show you more ads that way.

  • j4k3@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    6 months ago

    It is half okay, but only if they are not getting paid to screw up your results. It is a coup against democracy where freedom of information is freedom of the press and is an entire fundamental pillar of democracy. Google’s entire business model has always been neo feudalism. A web crawler and search engine is like a library, it must be neutral, objective, and publicly funded as a non profit. Much the same with YT, it is our digital public commons and the most efficient form for information sharing in the primary form of human communication.

  • sin_free_for_00_days@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    I read on here (I think) a couple months ago that adding “before:2023” to your search terms improves results a lot. I’ve found it to be true. Unless I’m looking for something specifically from the last couple years.

    • TheBeesKnees@lemmy.sdf.orgOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 months ago

      Unfortunately, I’m usually searching software development issues and half the results are a decade old (and are no longer relevant for the language anymore). Assuming “after:xx” works too this night help, thank you!

    • TheBeesKnees@lemmy.sdf.orgOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      You honestly though the most used search engine has been abandoned by everyone? Maybe share what you’re using instead of just being pretentious?

      • NegativeLookBehind@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        I totally honestly believed that. I’m just so naive, how do I get by in life? Thank goodness you’re here to set me straight. What would I do without you? How did you get so good at computers? You must be some kind of wizard.