(Disclaimer: I voted against Trump and anyone who supported him in my state.)

  • LordCrom@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    232
    ·
    23 days ago

    Before, his power was checked by legislature…but now GOP has full control over the gov, and the supreme Court has 5 members nominated by Trump, soon to be 7.

    Hand maidens tale seems possible. Destruction of the middle class through tariffs, union busting, tear down of heath coverage, teardown public schools, force colleges to abandon certain studies or no federal money…

    Add in non stop fossil fuel promotion with drill baby drill attitudes, tear down NOAA and the nhc because strong hurricane news reinforces climate change.

    I guarantee in 4 years Trump will try to name a successor instead of holding an election.

    • Asafum@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      54
      ·
      23 days ago

      tear down NOAA

      Fuuuccckkkk… Add to the list of things I forgot… The AccuWeather guy is about to become even more wealthy…

      The billionaire class are the only winners of this election, but then again when aren’t they the winner? Money is literally power.

    • AndrewZabar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      edit-2
      22 days ago

      I guarantee in 4 years Trump will try to name a successor instead of holding an election.

      No. He will not name a successor, he will remain president. Either he will eliminate elections or he will do like his idol, Putin. Arrest and murder anyone who dares oppose him.

      He is an extreme narcissist and egotist. Like extreme extreme. He cannot see a future where he’s not on the throne.

    • Kyrgizion@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      23 days ago

      Wanna bet he’ll put up one of his kids (hell perhaps even Barron?) and bend the whole sycophantic side of the GOP into endlesdly propping them up?

      In 4 years, you may simply get Trump III. I want to say this notion seems absurd, except that it absolutely isn’t.

    • Maggoty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      22 days ago

      Goddamnitalltohell. I forgot we’re going to have to subscribe to private disaster warning systems. That’s pretty much it in a nutshell. Perfectly describes everything they want to do.

    • AwkwardLookMonkeyPuppet@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      22 days ago

      Add in non stop fossil fuel promotion with drill baby drill attitudes

      Do you remember a few years ago when the orange idiot hugged a piece of coal and called it “beautiful clean coal”? Ugh, what a dip shit.

      I guarantee in 4 years Trump will try to name a successor instead of holding an election.

      And it’ll certainly be one of his moronic children.

  • Limonene@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    141
    ·
    23 days ago

    Pretty fucked, but not as fucked as Ukraine, Palestine, Lebanon, or Taiwan.

    NATO will be fucked for a while if the US withdraws, but other NATO countries may ramp up military spending over time.

    This situation is a worldwide danger. The US is/was a world power, it has/had the largest national economy in the world, it has the largest military in the world.

    Previously, we could be concerned that democratic countries (including the US) weren’t putting enough pressure on authoritarian countries (like Russia, China, and North Korea) to improve. Now we have to worry that the US will actually become a fully authoritarian country, like Russia or China.

    • halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      42
      ·
      23 days ago

      On the bright side… the rest of the world is realizing that being reliant on one country for military power and maintaining stability was a terrible idea. The UN and NATO only have power if the countries are willing to enforce those decisions, and if the US doesn’t, there isn’t really a comparable backup option. The US military was always the elephant in the room keeping things generally less extreme just by its existence and not reacting impulsively.

      • TheEighthDoctor@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        21 days ago

        Just to add, it was always the US strategy to have the western world dependent on it for defence, it gave them a lot of soft and hard power and allowed for unopposed imperialism in “less important” (with a lot of irony) parts of the world.

    • TranquilTurbulence@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      22 days ago

      If NATO fades into oblivion, that would be a great opportunity for European countries to make a news defense organization where a single country like Hungary or Turkey can’t play their political games.

      • philpo@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        22 days ago

        Technically the EU already is an defence organisation (Lisbon accords), even with a stronger mutual assistance clause than NATO. What is different is that there is no integrated command structure. But that is currently rapidly changing, Germany and the Netherlands already are fully integrated (more than NATO standards are), the Baltics are making great progress.

        There is at least a chance

  • Sanctus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    100
    ·
    23 days ago

    Extremely, tarrifs will erase the middle class. All regulations will be repealed allowing even more corporate power and influence. We’re about to experience the Gilded Age on crack mixed with the burning hells of our mother Earth scorned.

    • halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      31
      ·
      23 days ago

      Time to stock up on the automatic rifles they want us all to have so much, and learn carpentry to build some guillotines.

      Maybe the French will help us again, they’ve got some experience with this.

      • Sanctus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        23 days ago

        We dont need guillotines. We need to heal our culture and unify Americans by ending the two party system that thrives off our division. We are so big we should be lead by a coalition of factions. Not whatever the fuck this is.

        • halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          23 days ago

          Ah yes, the same rhetoric that got us into this mess. Do nothing that actually makes a difference, but try to “fix” it from within. Meanwhile everything is being stolen with intentional legal loopholes.

          How do you propose removing the two party system, which the two parties comprising the entirety of the government have every incentive to keep because it’s the only reason they have the power they do? The only way, as designed an within the existing system is to get enough representation in to force that change, which means replacing 2/3 of Congress essentially at the same time to force super majorities on both sides.

          • Sanctus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            23 days ago

            Do I need to remind everyone that the French Revolution eventually fed their own into the guillotines? No? We’re just keen on repeating every bit of history until we’re baked off this rock? Okay. Let’s do that instead of trying to ratify citizen petitions, getting collective action, and actually building a unified ideal over time. Nah, thats much too hard. Buy some wood, meet up with the three other willing people, and go stand outside some politicians house with a guillotine while he calls his donners all scared and they write up more protest laws.

            • halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              23 days ago

              Let’s do that instead of trying to ratify citizen petitions, getting collective action, and actually building a unified ideal over time.

              Those work on a local level, not federal. Citizens have no control of anything Federal. The Federal government doesn’t have to listen to the citizens at all. The only consequence for them is during re-election. There they’ll just gerrymander the districts to force a win either way overall.

              The federal government relies on each branch overseeing each other. And the Republicans have a stacked blatantly partisan Supreme Court that gave the office of the President total immunity. And a Republican majority in both sides of Congress completely willing to let Trump do what he wants as far of the plan.

              Fixing this at a federal level will require getting to the exact opposite point we’re at now since we’ve allowed it to get to this point.

      • hddsx@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        23 days ago

        Why do you need to learn carpentry? Isn’t it a slot with a big metal blade? Add a rope so you can pull it up, and let it go to make it work…

    • _bcron_@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      23 days ago

      Tariffs will not only erase the middle class but also erase our topsoil like it’s 1924 all over again if farmers aren’t subsidized and everything is left to go fallow. In terms of dollars we’re pretty even in terms of agricultural imports and exports, but in terms of acreage… We push a shitload of soy, corn, and wheat. We’re more than a little fucked in lots of ways if we’re hit with retaliatory tariffs, but the biggest one is if farmers don’t have any reason to plant crops and don’t have any money to do it, we’re doomed for dustbowl days.

      Don’t even get me started on water, fluoride is one thing but if they start removing a lot of other stuff like phosphate and permanganate the entire country’s municipal water supply will be as bad as Flint MI.

      I’m hoping Trump doesn’t pull off 95% of the stuff he talked about due to unbridled incompetence because if he still manages to pull off 80% of it we’re gonna be fucked

      • halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        23 days ago

        No they’ll keep things like the farm subsidies, may even expand them. The tariffs will leave those out. That’s the socialism their base is 100% reliant on. They won’t risk turning on the rural farmers until the end when it they’re not a threat. They’ve already shown a complete willingness to ignore absolutely everything else until this point.

        • _bcron_@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          23 days ago

          I’m hoping. Last trade war, Trump basically rolled out of bed one morning and decided to try it on China as some temporary transient thing in order to convey that the US has a lot of leverage (and it blew up in our faces), which is an entirely different beast than unilateral tariffs as part of fiscal policy. I have no clue how much it’d cost to just subsidize everything in perpetuity but I hope it isn’t some ridiculous sum.

          He’ll probably do something like allowing us to sell semiconductors to foreign nations in exchange for dropping tariffs on agricultural exports which is also really fucking boneheaded. The art of the deal, giving away the only shit that has lots of value for us. China outpacing the US in tech is something Europe wouldn’t want, but if we cut ties with Europe they’d probably warm up to China and we’d become a really big insular nation that can’t even sustain its economy as is

      • Sanctus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        22 days ago

        If he manages to pull off even 25% we will be fucked until the last soul melts on the 200 degree pavement. Its never the time for regressionism, but now is especially a bad time.

        • _bcron_@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          23 days ago

          We’re already net exporter of petroleum but they’re intending to carve up our parks and stuff, even though we won’t be able to sell it for more than the cost of producing it. Everyone will slam us with tariffs and go to other countries for their fix, and it’ll be cheaper than bottled water for us.

          The idiots who don’t understand what a pronoun is and are terrified of their kids learning about them in English class will have cheap gas, but their kids will endure a literal hell for it.

          And they’ll think Trump’s doing a good job for all of it, blame some totally unrelated shit for our interest rate being at 25%

          • Sanctus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            23 days ago

            I’m over it. Be fucking stupid. Sell shit out for cheap. Stain the future with the blood of our children. We are out of time on the climate. The Earth will swallow us as our madness consumes us. Its a triple pronged rape of humanity’s future.

      • stoly@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        23 days ago

        Ending farming and allowing nature to return would prevent a dust bowl. Allowing a field to go fallow means that a whole lot of plants start growing.

        • _bcron_@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          22 days ago

          It might do that in some fields but it’d take ages in those spots where all you see is corn as far as the eye can see. Might be switchgrass growing in a drainage ditch but it’d just creep in like capillary action on a paper towel. You’d need to have people out there casting seed at least

          • stoly@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            22 days ago

            That’s because it is soil that has been destroyed through decades of mismanagement. That is what caused the previous dust bowl.

      • Sanctus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        22 days ago

        We end up paying them. Not countries, or corporations. The cost gets passed to consumers.

        • Mango@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          22 days ago

          Okay, but why is that specific to the middle class?

          Also, wouldn’t it make sense to tarrif all the businesses who are using other countries for cheap labor?

          • Sanctus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            22 days ago

            What good do tarrifs do towards companies if they pass that on to consumers? When will that price ever touch their wallets? Its not specific to the middle class, the poor will also be eradicated. I just thought I’d mention we’re heading towards a shit ass society where you are either poor or rich. Theres no in between, theres no comfort, theres just a boot stomping on the face of humanity forever.

            • Mango@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              22 days ago

              Well it should hit them in the wallet when people choose not to buy that thing because there’s something better at the same price here.

                • Mango@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  22 days ago

                  Don’t buy the stuff. Buy the American stuff so it goes back in American wallets. That’s the idea right?

  • Kyrgizion@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    66
    ·
    23 days ago

    Let me put it this way: we will see the true beginning of WW3 in the Baltics. Trump will predictably not act upon that and the response will be 100% up to Europe itself.

    That response better be an armed one, and quick too, or we all better start practicing cyrillic here in W-europe.

    Regardless if we are lucky, “only” tens of thousands will die. More likely it will be millions.

    So yeah, Trump kinda bedazzled us there, no way around it. Won’t be until the people who voted him in will start hurting personally that they’ll finally realize they’ve been conned. But too little too late.

    • OldManBOMBIN@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      22 days ago

      Won’t be until the people who voted him in will start hurting personally that they’ll finally realize they’ve been conned. But too little too late.

      Cute that you think they won’t just blame Mexicans when they do start hurting.

      • DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        22 days ago

        Germany’s fatal mistake in WW2 was not being America instead.

        Who, exactly, is to take its place along with the British Empire and USSR in holding back fascism?

  • futatorius@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    61
    ·
    22 days ago

    Some people are going to die-- mostly women. More people are going to have their lives turned upside-down, especially immigrants and ethnic and sexual minorities. Many immigrants, even legal ones, are going to be expelled. Corporations are going to run wild as regulation is abandoned. People are going to be bankrupted by predatory healthcare firms at a much higher rate than now. Every form of corporate pollution, adulteration, cheating and chicanery will be tolerated. The judiciary will be further corrupted. The US will not only withdraw from NATO, but will try to shut it down. Ukraine will be handed to Putin on a platter. Taiwan, the Baltics, Moldova and Poland will be left to fend for themselves. The ethnic cleansing in Gaza will transition even further to a full-scale genocide. Every aspect of government will be handed to corrupt, incompetent fanatics: kakistocracy all the way down. The impartiality of the civil service will be destroyed and the 19th-century spoils system reinstated. Social Security will be privatized and gutted. Obamacare will be eliminated. Congress will hold show trials of Trump’s perceived enemies. Terrorist acts and sabotage of critical infrastructure will massively increase, and the clampdowns that follow will be used to further degrade what few rights we still have.

    But at least you won’t have Kamala’s pantsuit to complain about.

    • rwtwm@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      22 days ago

      All that, and you may have left out the most damaging of all… Trump will likely pull the US out of Copenhagen, leaving no chance of limiting temps below 2C let alone getting anywhere near 1.5C. The excess deaths from this will likely dwarf COVID.

      • 🔍🦘🛎@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        22 days ago

        Honestly, I can’t be bothered to worry about the climate 100 years from now when we’re going to be attacking (many more) Americans 100 days from now

        • Geldaran@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          22 days ago

          Don’t get me wrong, Drumph’s second term will be bad for everyone. But the climate issue is going to be truly catastrophic on a scale even he and his cronies can’t match. There should be plenty of worry to go around.

        • AWittyUsername@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          22 days ago

          Mate it’s not 100 years, more like 20. Look at all the extreme weather from this year alone. Most recently with Spain.

    • humble peat digger@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      22 days ago

      Why dont you guys start your own " stop the steal"?
      Just say that 20 million illegals voted for trump, Kamala won and all this is just big election fraud.

      Just wondering.

    • insufferableninja@lemdro.id
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      22 days ago

      bro, i know all that stuff is bad, but have you heard her laugh? we made a solid choice.

      (i hope i don’t need the /s, but Poe’s Law says i probably do)

  • Snapz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    46
    ·
    edit-2
    21 days ago

    One of the biggest things is that the “deep state”, an innocuous thing turned into a convenient boogeyman by trump, will be quietly destroyed. This is the thing that actually keep your mail arriving, your food edible and your children’s toys not coated in lead. The “deep state”, meaning actual subject matter experts doing their jobs throughout entire government for years, regardless of current administration, are all going to be replaced by kid rock and vaping young republicans fresh from dropping out of their second semester in at The University of Southern Alabama State.

    That’s who’s going to be the dude inspecting your meat for e.coli and signing off on the clinical trials for your perception meds - Gunner, Hunter and Ryder.

    Really don’t think anyone is considering the reality of how deeply fucked we’re going to be as we’re all fixed fully on the front door for obvious signs of trouble (immediate societal decay), while these broken cartoon villains fill the crawlspace with fertilizer and gasoline and kick in the backdoor with flamethrowers in hand.

    We’re fucked, and we’re going to be focused on monitoring the wrong indicators of how fucked, until it is just beyond any repair within any of our lifetimes. For example, you’re going to have FIVE fundamentally broken people on the Supreme Court for the rest of your life. It’s over.

    • DeLacue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      22 days ago

      There is alot of things the government does for you that most people likely have never thought about. Take invasive species for instance; There are huge efforts to contain and eradicate a variety of invasive species. You’ve probably never heard about these efforts. But they are needed to maintain and protect both farmland and the ecology of the United States. If those efforts are defunded and those species are allowed to run rampant it’ll be almost impossible to put that genie back in the bottle.

    • ohlaph@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      21 days ago

      Exactly. They seem to forget the regulations rhat were lifted for the railroad industry and the multiple train disasters as a result.

  • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    22 days ago

    Between 2017 and 2021, things got pretty bad. Riots, wars, a plague, economic crash, and it ended with a mob breaking into the nation’s capital and trashing the place.

    Can’t imagine a repeat will be better.

    • leftytighty@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      22 days ago

      That was with moderates and non-partisan civil servants playing interference on his worst ideas.

      You remember everything that came out about how people would ignore his orders until he forgot?

      None of those people will be there

      • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        22 days ago

        At some point he needs to be able to physically enact proposals. Like, it’s one thing to say “Build a wall” and it’s another to get the land rights, hire the contractors, do the work, maintain it on competition, etc, etc.

        You can go down to the border now and you’ll find this rink a dink bullshit that’s falling over in a light breeze. Then you’ve got spools full of razor wire tossed into the steadily shallower Rip Grande. People got paid tens of millions to put that garbage in the ground. And that was under an ostensibly competent administration.

        I agree we’re going to get a ton of shit policy. Police violence under Trump is going to skyrocket. Vigilantee violence is going to jump. Border guard violence is going through the roof. But, like, is he going to build anything that can last? Or is he going to get the Americanized version of Neom? A bunch of scammers delivering invisible clothes to prance around in.

        I guess we’ll find out.

  • ByteOnBikes@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    39
    ·
    edit-2
    20 days ago

    The US will continue ticking. Money keeps flowing, and greed will continue running rampant.

    As someone making bank and based on the projections, the Trump tax changes are going to pay well. Anyone making less than $100k, or living off of social security or retirement are going to really suffer.

    The Trump tax breaks are going to fund a future international trip. And poor folks will starve.

    Btw I voted for Kamala. And America voted for a old dude who struggles to form sentences.

  • DeLacue@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    22 days ago

    Multiple regulatory bodies are going to get disbanded. The EPA is unlikely to survive, whole departments of the FDA are about to get gutted. Anything involving industrial safety is going to get its funding cut. Unconstitutional crackdowns on free and independent media is almost certain. Large scale damage to the functions of many government institutions can be expected. Massive economic damage due to reckless deregulation ( that’s even before they start putting tariffs on everything and wind up in multiple simultaneous trade wars). Funding for education and infrastructure maintenance will be reduced to allow tax cuts for the already wealthy. Massive loss of global influence and a massive gain in influence by hostile autocratic nations is also something you can expect.

    I could go on and on but even if you were to assume they weren’t serious about project 2025 (if you haven’t read that you should) it’s real bad.

    • uxia@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      22 days ago

      call me hopelessly naiive but just… why? the why is what i can never wrap my head around? why do they want to destroy the country? do they hate it? and like… why would people want to get rid of social security? do they just want people after 65 years old to… die? why?? i’m so sad…

      • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        22 days ago

        Yes. America has always been two countries. I hate the America they love and they hate the America we love. And the problem is that these Americas have always existed together. We’re the Union to their confederacy. We’re the premature anti fascists to their silver shirts.

      • BlueMacaw@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        22 days ago

        Many believe they are saving the country by voting for Trump. Everyone sees that America is going downhill. Everything is more expensive, more uncertain, more precarious. Leftists blame corporations and corporate capture of government agencies. Right wingers think that more corporate power is good and if left unchecked, the “free market” (aka government rules that favor unchecked corporate malfeasance) will be better for America.

        People vote for their economic interests, as best as they can understand them. Most on the right think that their economic interests are served by corporate deregulation and scapegoating of immigrants. However, within that context, this is also why removing social security is not realistic. That’s a direct attack on people’s benefits, which they are not in favor of. Right wing corporate types want to cut social security so they don’t have to pay taxes, or there will be more money in the government coffers to give back to the corporations. But the majority of right wing people that the corporate types rely on for votes will never vote to repeal social security.

  • marcos@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    22 days ago

    Weirdly, it depends on how honest Trump is.

    If he forgets about everything he talked at any part of the campaign, and just decide to maximize his tranquility during his term, not as bad as if he decides to keep his promises.

  • rsuri@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    22 days ago

    We should remember that most Americans still live in blue states with sane governments. The federal government can’t just barge in and do whatever it wants, and if tries to do so, the social contract that binds the nation together is broken and secession becomes a real possibility. But that’s unlikely because Trump is far too clueless to know about any of the problems he’ll run into if he tries to implement any of his plans.

    Which is fine for him because it was always a con anyway. He talks and acts out of his ass. What he will do is anyone’s guess, but it’ll at least be restrained by what’s realistically possible.

    • Lenny@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      22 days ago

      And what about the ones, like me, in red states? How fucked are we? (I know the answer and hence drunk and high rn)

      • yrmp@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        22 days ago

        Realistically people should start to self sort and leftists should start to purchase and train with guns if they don’t have them for their family’s protection.

    • DeLacue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      22 days ago

      I’d love be as optimistic as you but unless Trump changes his mind the US will get a brainwormed fanatical anti-vaccier in charge of deciding which vaccines are safe to use. Even if the states don’t cooperate with trump’s agenda there are so many long standing federal institutions which till now you’ve never needed to think about that are about to get wrecked.

    • stalfoss@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      22 days ago

      My so called blue state of California just voted against minimum wage increase, against rent control, against banning slavery, and for increasing the war on drugs. At least this time we narrowly voted to approve gay marriage (unlike last time where we banned it)

    • Flocklesscrow@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      22 days ago

      The Federal government CAN just barge in. We specifically designed the structure that way. Federal supercedes state.

    • Dkarma@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      22 days ago

      He will absolutely move the military into a blue state to force compliance. This is how the next civil war will start. Red Force and blue resistance.

    • AwkwardLookMonkeyPuppet@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      22 days ago

      We must come to the realization that America is deeply racist and sexist, incapable of electing a Black, Asian woman to its highest office because of our culture’s innate, widespread, and unreconciled bias and hatred.

      If that’s true, then why on earth would the DNC do everything in their power to ensure that was the only “choice” available to voters? Do they like losing?

      • scemmy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        22 days ago

        Objectively, the standards applied to the two candidates is wildly different, I’m not sure why we blame anyone other than voters, at this point.

  • SharkEatingBreakfast@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    edit-2
    23 days ago

    I can’t leave.

    I have a child with an abusive, vindictive ex-spouse. Regardless of me having sole custody, I would still need to get both the court’s permission and his permission just to move out of state, so god knows I will not be able to get out of the country.

    I’m at a loss. I will not leave without my kid.

    • Nollij@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      23 days ago

      It’s little solace, but not all destination countries will care about that. It might force you to stay away, which creates its own issues.

  • prime_number_314159@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    22 days ago

    Trump was pretty ineffective in his first term, largely because he did a terrible job of supporting people who really agreed with his agenda, and an even worse job of removing people from influential positions who didn’t.

    He said during his campaign that he knew much better who to trust, but now he’s got Elon Musk and RFK Jr. prominently featured. I don’t think he has learned anything, and I think he will be just as ineffective this time.

    It’s possible that some of the Republicans in Congress will support more of his agenda, but even there if they have to overcome the filibuster, I don’t think mass deportation, a federal abortion ban, or most of the rest of the potential worst of it is in the cards.

    • boonhet@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      22 days ago

      I reckon that in all likelihood the Project 2025 folks will piss him off at some point and he’ll just throw a tantrum and refuse to work with them. Doesn’t mean he’ll suddenly turn into a leftist, but if he doesn’t play ball, they’ll have trouble getting anything passed.

    • futatorius@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      22 days ago

      They’ll kill off the filibuster as soon as it gets in their way. They don’t care about tradition or institutional continuity. And anyway, the Democrats seldom resort to the filibuster, they just bend over.

      Trump and Musk will have a power struggle within a few months. Trump hates the idea that someone’s richer than him, and will want to humiliate him. Trump will dump RFK Jr too, as soon as Jr gets more publicity than Trump. What will be semi-permanent are the careerist shitstains like the Speaker, the God-botherers with their crusade against women, and the anti-immigrant scum.

  • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    edit-2
    22 days ago

    Luckily the House of representatives have set up the rules such that they can call to change their majority leader whenever they disagree with each other, so very few actual policies will change. They might even fail to pass their own tax plan again, that would be nice.

    What is fucked is USA’s allies depending on support from NATO, USA’s economy as Tariff season is here now, USA immigrants, and of course the Environment. Last time Trump was in he removed protections for forests and streams, and put a Coal Lobbyist in charge of the EPA.

    • ByteOnBikes@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      21 days ago

      Luckily the House of representatives have set up the rules such that they can call to change their majority leader whenever they disagree with each other, so very few actual policies will change.

      A bunch of things did get changed during the last presidency because of the Republican majority.

      Healthcare, internet privacy, hell even how mail got delivered.

      If it’s not from policy changes, it’s from gutting the department and putting in cronies willing to sabotage the industry. You brought up environment policies, yeah those are gonna die.

    • mctoasterson@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      21 days ago

      The House isn’t stuck with that though. They can amend the rules for the next session, and I’d imagine any speaker worth his salt would demand that rule be stricken because it is unworkable.

      • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        21 days ago

        But in order to ammend the rules they first have to agree on it. Any speaker who opposes it can just be deposed because of the rule.

        I know I’m being overoptimistic but I have high hopes for it.

        • NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          21 days ago

          In a new session isn’t there no speaker until one is elected with any rules?

          Just don’t accept the rules and go into another cycle of endless votes for speaker.